Discuss how Leadership styles effect Employee motivation in an organization?
Answers: Why is leadership style important? Because it directly impacts the organizational climate which in turn accounts for nearly a third of financial performance. Here are some styles and how they impact:
The Coercive Style
From my experience in the corporate world, this is the most common style. It is the "do what I tell you to do" technique that many people rely on because it seems easy. It's also the style that junior managers or those that are frustrated will fall back on. The unfortunate result is that in most situations, coercive leadership inhibits the organization's flexibility and dampens employees' motivation. I would argue that this is a good technique for leaders and managers to use with junior personnel who simply don't have the knowledge to make informed decisions.
The Authoritative Style
I don't like the name of this style. The term has negative connotations for me and yet it is a style that is effective in many situations. An authoritative leader uses the "come with me" approach by stating the overall goal, but giving people the freedom to choose their own means of achieving it. This style works especially well when a business is adrift. It is less effective when the leader is working with a team of experts who are more experienced than he is. As my familiarity in a particular area or with a particular business unit increases, I believe I respond well to this form of management.
The Affiliative Style
I'm not too familiar with the pure affiliative style of leading and managing, but I have seen the negatives that such a technique can have. This style believes that "people come first" and is particularly useful for building team harmony or increasing morale. The negative? Its exclusive focus on praise can allow poor performance to go uncorrected. I don't know about you, but having a happy-go-lucky manager who doesn't cut people that aren't pulling their weight doesn't make want to work particularly hard.
The Democratic Style
According to the research, this style's impact on organizational climate is not as high as most people might imagine. There's no question that by giving workers a voice in decisions, democratic leaders build organizational flexibility and responsibility and help generate fresh ideas. The downside is that such a style can lead to endless meetings and confused employees who feel leaderless. I think a lot of managers use this style exclusively when they first start out as they fail to realize that they're not employed to be everyone's friend, but rather to move the business forward.
The Pacesetting Style
On paper the pacesetting style sounds quite exhilarating (to me anyway) since the leader who sets high performance standards and exemplifies them himself has a very positive impact on employees who are self-motivated and highly competent. The problem is that many employees who are just at work because they need to pay their rent tend to feel overwhelmed by such a leader's demands for excellence–and to resent his tendency to take over a situation. I think this style shouldn't be confused with the "just do it" attitude that some managers exhibit without providing any direction, resources, or time.
The Coaching Style
This last style focuses more on personal development than on immediate work-related tasks. It works well when employees are already aware of their weaknesses and want to improve, but not when they are resistant to changing their ways. I'd hazard a guess and say that this style will only be effective with a small percentage of people on any given team.
When near is a recession..does that mingy prices walk up or down?
Do you think that the United States are facing a recession?Answers: It's patent that we are sitting on the edge of a resession. The cutback is slowing a great deal due to the horrible house marketplace and the fact that Americans are spending most of their money on gas and food and not exit their wallets for anything else. Employment opportunity will slow causing smaller number and less spending. Prices budge up. Prices have to drop within order to avoid or verbs ourselves out of a recession. Even if that means companies stop making HUGE profits.
In a recession, consumers are fear the threat that there would not be satisfactory jobs around or they will loose their job soon.
The natural instinct is to close up their pockets and release as much money as possible.
Whey they are unwilling to spend, businesses will have a firm time selling.
To coax consumers to spend again, businesses will have to lower thier price by freshly a bit.
I live in MI and we enjoy been contained by a recession for 2 years
Florida and CA are also in recession
Prices stay almost the same. nearby is just smaller quantity $ in the reduction. people stop spending, the U.S. stops growing and when things stop growing later they must be shrinking and there is your recession.
Yes the US is WAY overdue for a correction/recession.
The money contained by your pocket goes down...
Were in fact in a recession on the brink of a depression...
They are not related!
We own a rescession when we are not making as much money as we were. Inflation/deflation is what cause prices to go up/down - specifically when our money starts to become worth more or less than it used to be...
Where can I generate a catalogue of competitors to a company?
I am trying to find a list of adjectives companies that make a definite product. I have one and would close to to know what their competition is. Is there a website that can generate a enumerate like this for me?Answers: There are different companies that will compile the information you seek...
here's one I found...
http://www.tlclists.com/