my point is suppose a trader imports grease & then get rid of it on high marine sale font. On receipt of grease it is found that there is shortage of grease. In this case whether the loss due shortage is to be beared by the buyer(high the deep sale basis) or the purveyor
Answers: This question is posted surrounded by the section for INSURANCE.
My guess is that the general public who would know about the possession "high ocean sale" are found in the subsection for LAW & ETHICS.
That is only my guess, but you probably will not find individuals here in this cubicle who can help you.
My on the spot guess is that if a person buys something, that human being should get what he salaried for. Also, the person who shipped it should be competent protect it with insurance. If you did not bring what you paid for, my hope is that the party who put up the consignment is responsible for making good on what he represented it to be.
My guess.
The lawyer in the LAW & ETHICS article may provide an answer that is much better than my simplistic guess.
Hope you chew over it is a worthwhile suggestion.
Answers: This question is posted surrounded by the section for INSURANCE.
My guess is that the general public who would know about the possession "high ocean sale" are found in the subsection for LAW & ETHICS.
That is only my guess, but you probably will not find individuals here in this cubicle who can help you.
My on the spot guess is that if a person buys something, that human being should get what he salaried for. Also, the person who shipped it should be competent protect it with insurance. If you did not bring what you paid for, my hope is that the party who put up the consignment is responsible for making good on what he represented it to be.
My guess.
The lawyer in the LAW & ETHICS article may provide an answer that is much better than my simplistic guess.
Hope you chew over it is a worthwhile suggestion.