Does anyone else find it odd that the insurance industry hasn't lobbied Congress for mandatory DRLs.
DRLs own been proven to exhaust accidents, thus lowering insurance payouts. DRLs would be contained by the best interest of the Insurance Companie's bottom line and Americans surrounded by general.
Many strange cars have the DRLs enabled by evasion because so many countries already build them mandatory. Why is the USA stuck in the foggy ages on this issue?
Answers: Yes I agree, circle gets the square.
The US auto industry have limited DRL's on vehicle. Reason: Additional cost to the industry.
In the early 1970's GM certainly lobbied against having form belts in cars.
In the mid 80's the auto manufacturer lobbied to not have the 3rd backside tail light on cars.
The (mostly USA) auto manufacture resisted placing airbags in cars. All of this increases their costs, and reduce profit on their cars.
They are profit motive not safety motive.
It doesn't cut back payouts much, and most insurance companies allow a discount for cars that have the DRLs.
In the USA, most peope prefer that the governing body NOT micromanage everything. It's called, letting the PEOPLE settle on. If you want a car near DRL, buy one. If not, let it walk.
You don't have to legislate EVERYTHING. If you want everything legislated, move to Cuba.
DRLs own been proven to exhaust accidents, thus lowering insurance payouts. DRLs would be contained by the best interest of the Insurance Companie's bottom line and Americans surrounded by general.
Many strange cars have the DRLs enabled by evasion because so many countries already build them mandatory. Why is the USA stuck in the foggy ages on this issue?
Answers: Yes I agree, circle gets the square.
The US auto industry have limited DRL's on vehicle. Reason: Additional cost to the industry.
In the early 1970's GM certainly lobbied against having form belts in cars.
In the mid 80's the auto manufacturer lobbied to not have the 3rd backside tail light on cars.
The (mostly USA) auto manufacture resisted placing airbags in cars. All of this increases their costs, and reduce profit on their cars.
They are profit motive not safety motive.
It doesn't cut back payouts much, and most insurance companies allow a discount for cars that have the DRLs.
In the USA, most peope prefer that the governing body NOT micromanage everything. It's called, letting the PEOPLE settle on. If you want a car near DRL, buy one. If not, let it walk.
You don't have to legislate EVERYTHING. If you want everything legislated, move to Cuba.