How do you seize auto insurance for an exchange student?
Question:
Answer:
If the exchange student gets a US drivers license (not an international one!), the host inherited can add them as an hand to their auto policy for the length of the call in.
The following site has a great free comparison quote piece. Get a free quote and if you like the best price offered you can purchase the policy right nearby.
Why do individuals push Annuities?
Question:
I'm currently trying to save for retirement and sale people are other trying to push annuities. Why is that?
Pros vs. Cons
Answer:
Annuities tend to be a long term commitment next to a high long residence commission to the seller. They are a unpromising deal for the investor unless you own exhausted all other investment vehicle. Dont get confused beside fixed or variable annuities. Both are a doomed to failure deal. Another type of annuitiy is the one time investment where on earth you receive a payment for existence. (Also a bad deal).
A fixed annuity is usually invested surrounded by bonds, a variable annuity is invested contained by mutual funds. You not only settle the management tax of the investment vehicle, you also pay the government fee for the insurance company. Why earnings double fees? Also, you give up the pre-eminence of taking capital gain as all income is taxable surrounded by an annuity. Another negative is that if you go past away your heirs inherit the taxable gain of the annuity and you give up the dominance for your heirs of a contemporary stepped up basis. I can see no benefit to you of investing in an annuity. If your financial guide suggested an annuity, get a latest adviser.
I guess annuities are OK, but a great deal of times they are more interested in the commissions.
Really the most vital issues are rate of return, risk, and costs.
Nice, high commissions.
It's not as angelic for the client as a well-diversified mutual fund and stock portfolio - it doesn't earn as much.
The ONLY plus is, you're "guaranteed" a return. I don't even know what they're guaranteeing these days - 3%? 5%? But it's roughly 25% of what the INSURANCE company makes, investing your money. They hold on to the other 75%.
The problem is, you can do BETTER in a ticket of deposit, AND you don't pay commissions for it.
I'm not a aficionado. Sorry.
Sales persons push annuities because of the illustrious and continuing commissions they will earn. Annuities have elevated expenses, restrictions on investments and withdrawals and the stock option offered generally beneath perform investments you can kind yourself.
The only apposite thing more or less an annuity is that if it is properly set it it will guarantee income for the rest of your life.
I work for an insurance company and one of the fundamental things we sell is annuities. They're thought for family that have a low risk tolerance contained by regards to their investment as they guarantee a minimum interest rate but nearby is no maximum interest. We have annuities base on the S&P 500, if it does better than the guaranteed rate than people receive the higher interest. You cannot lose next to an annuity as the insurance company assumes the risk.
CD's are not necessarily better as you tie your money up as well and hold to pay taxes every year. Annuities are export tax deferred, so taxes are due when you start taking out money not every year. So the money you would pay for taxes on CD's will still grow next to an annuity.
As for the commission, it is one of the reasons family might push it on you. But really the commission is not deducted from the money invested (I would verbs if it was).
And if it is a single premium annuity they will only find it only once (my company pays 4% commission on those). It's not renewable close to with time insurance (where agents get around 50%).
But you do own to be careful near annuities. Some agents might sell you a high-ranking interest annuity. Most likely you are tying up your money for a massively long time with those and own to pay penalty to take it out closer (surrender charges). There is annuities that are immediate or you can annuitize (take money out) it within less than 10 years.
Like I said it is better for elder folks (close to retirement) who need money sooner or general public that don't feel comfortable next to risk in the stock souk as they could lose all their money.
Hope I could lend a hand :)
How can I get hold of coup¨¦ insurance while visit the US on a visa?
Question:
Answer:
You're not going to find a US company that will give you a US policy, if you don't hold a license from a US state. They won't even do international licenses any more.
You'll hold to find coverage in your home country.
ou're not going to find a US company that will make available you a US policy, if you don't have a license from a US state. They won't even do international license any more.<br />
<br />
You'll have to find coverage within your home country.
Annuities?
Question:
While saving for retirement when is it a well-mannered time to invest in an annuity?
Answer:
The best time for an annuity is when you max out your 401K and your Roth IRA. Annuities are a righteous option for those who enjoy very immense sums of money that they do not want to pay taxes on. Careful beside annuities, you are basically holding rotten on paying taxes for when you retire. A time when most people would approaching to keep taxes at a minimum.
In MY view? Never.
I can ALWAYS do better with an index fund.
For some society, in some cases, yes annuitties can be a righteous idea. The answer will unsurprisingly depend on your individual situation.
Annuities are not the greatest idea for abiding towards retirement, but can be a good perception after retirement when you start to feel similar to you need to put the money elsewhere, etc etc (let the guy trying to market it to you explain it better since he'll obviously be putting some shine onto to it).
For the other 99% of ancestors, and the other 99% of the time you're better off beside some other investment product, IRAs, CD's, and yes even a generic fricken savings details can do better than most annuities (heck, Allstatebank.com will give you 4.25% on a simple funds account).
Hope this helps.
~C
ps. do read throuroughly the answers contained by your other posted question since they budge into more detail on some aspects.
It really depends on the financial situation of the client. Usually people who are nearing retirement but don't hold much saved should consider getting an annuity. If they believe the elected representatives is going to help them out because they are broke, they are just fooling themselves.
Or when someone wants to move the brass value from a duration insurance policy to an annuity without have to pay income taxes on it, later they can only do that near a 1035 exchange.
Or when someone maxed out their retirement plan at work and their IRA, then an annuity may be the subsequent way to squirrel away.
Annuities are just one route to save for retirement and, believe me, the previously you start saving the better. Annuities provide a relatively risk-free return on your money: when you're retired, stability of income become ever more important.
Have a look at this website which contains some adjectives advice, links which might help out you make up your mind.
Good luck!
What does assigned risk miserable?
Question:
Answer:
Most states require people to pass auto insurance. Accordingly, some people are such BAD DRIVERS, or undesirable drivers to insure, that insurance companies don't want to insure them.
States near an assigned risk plan, require ALL auto insurance companies doing business in their state, to write some of these undesirable drivers. So when an agent have a hard to place driver (aka, multiple DUI's, vehicular homicide, departure the scene of an accident, etc) they can convey the application into the state, and the state ASSIGNS a company to write it - at the state assigned rates.
assigned risk is a plan for drivers that no insurance company wants (due to doomed to failure records) the policies are rotated among the companies that do business in your state (so primarily the company is forced to write your business)
there is also an assigned risk policy for houses
What time of complete time insurance can you use as an investment vehical and how?
Question:
Answer:
Technically, the money you put into a whole energy policy isn't yours. If you wanted to use it, you hold to borrow it and pay interest on it. If you took money out of reserves account, do you enjoy to pay monthly interest on it or fees? In full life insurance, you do.
When you die, you may lose adjectives the cash convenience. Isn't that sucky?
If you want to invest, you are better off introductory a Roth IRA and invest into mutual funds. If you want life insurance, seize term insurance instead. That channel you are renting wealth for your kinfolk while building wealth for the adjectives. Down the road, you may or may not need existence insurance anymore.
there are 2 school of thought here.
1. Variable Universal Life. It is a combination Life Insurance and mutual fund investment. Part of your premium goes to the vivacity insurance, part go to your investments in the policy. This allows the "Cash Value" of your policy to grow, allowing you to nick tax free "Loans" down the road while still keeping the go insurance. Your money grows tax free or charge deferred in this. However the fees assessed on your mutual funds are big and this will slow growth some.
2. Buy term insurance, and invest the rest surrounded by mutual funds. Term insurance is far cheaper, so you would take the money you pick up and put it in mutual funds outside of your insurance policy. The growth on your mutual funds is taxable, but the fees are far lower, and it is much easier and more flexible if you want to use your funds. No rules.
There is no "perfect" answer. It depends on your age, what your goal for this investment are and other factors. Find a polite prfessional, who can do either program (Not merely one or the other) and pencil it out.
Great question and best of luck!
LIFE INSURANCE, it's JUST not an investment. Not any manner, not no way, not no how. You might as ably stick the cash surrounded by a mayo jar - then if you obligation to "cash out" within the first five years, you're AHEAD of the game. No surrender charges, penalty, fees, etc.
People SELL life insurance as an investment, because it sounds well-groomed. They mainly go it to people who are dumb going on for money. When these people coach themselves, they usually let the policy lapse - no use throwing appropriate money after bad.
DO THE MATH. You're not going to come out anywhere NEARLY ahead as the insurance company. If you're bound and determined to use insurance companies as an investment vehicle - buy their stock. You'll do better.
Most nation need enthusiasm insurance when they are young and enjoy a family, mortgage and other debt. They use enthusiasm insurance to protect their families by providing money to pilfer care of adjectives the above, and/or to replace their income.
As you get elder, the amount of insurance you need should gain smaller. You have compensated debts, mortgage and even saved a few bucks. The kids grow up and college bills are astern you now. You enjoy assets and little or no debt.
For these reasons, by occupancy insurance when you are young. It is cheapest and 15 years down the road, you won't hold too much into it to give it up when you no longer want it. Whole Life, Universal Life could have rates consequences and you have so tons years and money into them that you won't want to quit, even though you may not need the insurance. Not simply that, but if you were to buy a Whole vivacity or U life policy, you couldn't afford to money the price for the actual amount of coverage you need when you are young-looking. You can get the coverage you want at a much better price when you buy term insurance.
Make sure the occupancy policy is renewable and watch the premium increase. How long are the premiums locked surrounded by for? Will you have to qualify for the policy a few years down the road (health wise)? How lots years do you need the coverage?
Today the 401k is the big rival of insurance companies. People who have worked long plenty putting money into a 401k, in effect enjoy become self insured. Keep that in mind when you are decide on how much coverage is enough.
If you are young-looking and have a childlike family, please protect them, but be sage about it. Like others own said, don't use your life insurance as an investment, use it to proctect your loved ones. You can do much better next to investing, a whole duration or u life policy may not be the best place to invest your money.
Good luck!
That sounds approaching a question from an out-of-date text book.
Be vastly careful when you use the words duration ins and investment together like that. Many companies hold been fined millions for selling existence insurance as an investment vehicle.
I believe there are really one and only two types of permanent go insurance policies that can be used for what you suggest. Neither Whole Life nor basic Universal Life provide for much growth at adjectives. Most only pay envelope about 4% or so, and that almost doesn't even save up with inflation.
However, Variable Universal Life and Equity indexed Universal Life are different animals.
The first have within it sub-accounts that dance out into the market. Here you adopt the market risk, though some of the VUL's out at hand now also hold a fixed or conservative asset allocation model within them for you to choose if you prefer. That channel that you can get full souk potential (both up and down); but historically it's averaged 12% over time. (You have to look at your own time flash to see what your risk would be). Also, some companies are now formation to allow you to have the money inside your subaccounts professionally money managed = depending on stand amounts in at hand = for a nominal fee.
Equity Indexed Universal Life products usually own a guarantee of a floor of somewhere about 1-2% near a possible cap of 12% or more. Some of the newer products coming out own are being mentioned as have no cap at adjectives. That means if the souk goes down and tank, you still get your 1-2%; while if it go up, you can get your 12% or more if they allow it (to anything their cap is). Equity indexed products look at some "index" over a year to determine what the percent is -- commonly, but not always, this index is the S & P 500.
One of the things you commonly hear people screaming around, usually those who have no TRUE idea how a VUL works or who don't enjoy the required licenses to provide them so they have to badmouth them contained by order to market you what they do have, is that here are fees involved. Yup, there beyond doubt are. Almost invariably those fees are MUCH less than the other fees -(taxes) - that you would reward to the government if your money be outside of the tax profit shelter of the insurance product. If your VUL is structured correctly, you can also access the cash expediency without taxes.
What you definitely have to do is to sit down near a professional - one who is licensed to sell unpredictable products. Have him/her explain the pros and cons of each type of product for you surrounded by your own situation.
BTW: you may also hear some folks, even some here, scream lately buy term and invest the difference. Good view. That's EXACTLY what happens inside a VUL near some extra tax benefits as okay. They just don't realize specifically what's going on in in that.
(Addendum) One of the folks above says that: 401k's are the "opponent of insurance companies" . Hardly! Remember that when you pull money out of your 401k, you will be tax on it at regular income rates. Let's assume, just for fun, that you want to verbs out $90,000 per year from your 401k. Let's also assume you're in almost the 30% tax bracket. That funds about $30,000 would progress in taxes, and you'd bring to live on about $60,000 for the year. If you have that growth within a VUL, Equity Indexed Universal Life, or other Tax-advantage product, you could verbs out the $90,000 and live on the $90,000 since it wouldn't be taxed.) 401k's be initially set up as a supplemental retirement vehicle for folks to add to their pension. However, pensions are pretty much a article of the past in a minute, so lots of folks are being disappeared to fend for themselves and lots of them are in for some heartless surprises in a few years because they're not really sure only how those 401k's work. It is so very awful when I hear the surprise in people's voice when they find out that they WILL be taxed on the money coming out of their 401k's. A lot seem to be to believe that there will be no excise on that money.)
Can a learner's authorization know how to grasp an auto insurance?
Question:
Answer:
No...the insurance is specific to a vehicle or vehicles if you enjoy more than one. And to be designated as a driver (without a guardian) you must have a valid DL.
That's the route it has be in adjectives my years of driving.
No, you will ALSO need to catalogue a primary, LICENSED operator on the policy - the party who will be sitting with you, when you drive the motor.
o...the insurance is specific to a vehicle or vehicles if you enjoy more than one. And to be designated as a driver (without a guardian) you must have a valid DL.<br />
<br />
That's the instrument it has be in adjectives my years of driving.
What should be the best possessor for woman?
Question:
Answer:
Carrier or Career?
Before opting for any mover or career, reward some attention to your vocabulary to avoid disaster of meanings some afternoon to your disadvantage.
whatever she like to do best
Whether, man or woman, should take up a job suited to his/her interest, aptitude provide he/she has acquire necessary literary qualifications needed to enter that trade. Choosing a career base on Gender only is not correct.
It would depend upon your lessons level and interests !
its career*
MAN
Is it basic for woman to earn? She should satisfy on income of husband.
If depend on age of age, women to women.
Best are: Teaching, Home Tutions, making gudia/doll mark etc.
pls make this piece clear u want a carrier or a trade? there is something call as check spell pls do look into it n frame the question 4 sum sensible n good answers.its u who will opt ur career not us,we don't know ur capability!
bond ratings?
Question:
what r possible ratings issude by standar poors??
Answer:
http://www2.standardandpoors.com...
Here's their website, so you can look it up.
I hold not have motor insurance for three years I did own full no claims bonus,I own no paperwork policy No?
Question:
I do know who my insurers were will they issue a cert
on describe and address only more to the point will I still be
on their files or am I wasting my time contacting them
Answer:
You will need to shop around if your no claims bonus (NCB) is significant. Most insurers will not recognise NCB if it is more than 2 years old-fashioned. A while ago, however, I did manage to find someone who would recognise my NCB after I'd be working overseas for a couple of years.
your always on account and you should get your no claims if you did not claim
no they will own their records still as its solitary 3 years
Sadly you will have to start adjectives over again as new business I dream up a lapse of more than a year cancels out any no claims bonus surrounded by any case three years is markedly too long
You only qualify for no claims bonus if you reinsure inwardly 18 months.
I work in insurance. 9 times out of ten, earn NCB at whatever horizontal can be used again BUT only for a maximum of 2 years after the expiry date. So I doubt even if you run to track it down, you will be eligible to use it.
Sorry.
Hi,
I used "Screen Trade" to get my coup¨¦ insurance.I got the cheapest motor insurance in U.K.It's speedy ,easy and lawful. I came accross this company on TV News.Check it out here:
http://www.jdoqocy.com/click-1813149-102...
hi sally, it will be greatly difficult if you don't know who you were insured next to, if you can remember then they will still own your details on file, usually pet name and date of birth and they will find you.
I agree with the other answers, after a lapse of three years you will find it severely difficult to ascertain the records or find a company competent or willing to access them. sorry matey :-(
They obligation to hold records for 7 years. Also where on earth is the policy and Id cards who did you make the checks payable to? You can other contact the insurance department if you are not getting anywhere they will help.
Auto Insurance quiz...?
Question:
If my teen neighbor (with a licence)borrowed my car and he/she wrecked it, would my insurance cover it? If so, why do teens that are driving, own a licence, have to be covered on parents insurance if they are driving their parents sports car? Isn't the car already covered by insurance? Why do I enjoy to pay insurance on my teen and not my neighbor?
Answer:
That depends on your insurance provider. I hold USAA, and they cover anyone who drives either of my cars next to my permission. They also cover any vehicle I drive, including rental cars and someone else's car that I drive near their permission. But not adjectives insurance companies are like that. Call your insurance company and ask the quiz, but don't give the specifics on the other hand. Just ask if your policy covers someone who is not specifically listed on your policy but is driving your coup¨¦ with your go-ahead.
Depends on the exact wording of your insurance policy.
Your insurance will cover you for anyone that is driving your saloon with your approval (this includes your teenage neighbor).
Teens enjoy to be covered under their own policies or their parents policies (if the teen does not own their own policy) becuase they are high risk drivers and find into more accidents than adults.
If you own a teen in your household driving your vehicle, then at hand is a higher occasion of one of your vehicles person crashed. Therefore, the insurance co feels that you should payment a higher premium becuase in that is a higher likelyhood that they will hold to pay a claim.
Most plausible not-under 18 year olds cannot enter a contract. Pre 18 year olds must be covered through parents contract 'cause pre 18 year olds cannot enter a contract. Insurance contracts can only be inforced if 18 and up adults commit to it. Your neighbor is not anyone truthful to his/her insurance carrier.Nevermind thier false impression -deception 'cause the important entry here is that you fully understand the insurance contract that you enter unto(part of growing up). If the child lied to you to gain use of your car, consequently any damages have to be hash out in small claims court against the parents.5k impede can put you in debt forever if 300k contained by total damages are proven.
Request for Insurance on Gov't P.O?
Question:
Anyway, I can purchase insurance against a good Gov't P.O and draw the funds from a ridge until payment is due. Is that possible and what places excluding banks can I turn too.
Answer:
What's a Gov't PO?
You want to BORROW money to pay for insurance? Better own a lot of collateral to put up for the loan!
What exactly you want to do, is completely amorphous.
Why do I obligation to join my child to my saloon insurance policy if she never drives it anyway?
Question:
Answer:
IN Wisconsin you don't.
Is your agent telling you you should give her?
He may be trying to protect you from the possibility of her taking the car sometime and not have coverage.
Or he might be trying to increase his income.
You will be liable for damages if ever she finds keys and go for a drive and has a wreck.
I shouldn't consider you would have to. Only if the child is going to drive the sports car. Generally the insurance you already have covers learner drivers, but once they enjoy their license they are not covered. If there is a fate of the child driving the car consequently you would need the cover surrounded by case of chance as the insurance company will renege if she is not on the policy.
It's for safety reason. If you got surrounded by an accident and your child be in the vehicle, how will you pay for the hospital bill?
By tally her to your car insurance policy, you enjoy two benefits.
First of all, you are not really paying much more for her insurance. If she have been insured independently, the cost would be much more, contained by case she requests to drive some time.
Second, which is the MOST IMPORTANT reason, and the object that most parents do it, is that the longer she has insurance, and below this period when she does not incur any accident, then when she moves out subsequent in go and gets her own vehicle insurance, it will be alot cheaper than if she hadn't. Its like building up a sanctuary credit for later surrounded by life if you want to look at it that means of access.
because insurance companies need to know what their exposure is, vitally, anyone who lives in your household have access to your vehicle
I believe most insurance companies require all licensed drivers surrounded by a household to be included on the insurance. We specifically excluded our daughter on our insurance, but we had to switch to an insurance company that would allow it (from Auto Club Ins. to Progressive, surrounded by the state of Ohio). This saved us $3600 per year, as she have been surrounded by a couple of fender benders during her first year of driving. Check around with different insurance companies to see which ones will allow you to exclude your daughter and how much the hoard would be.
you should only hold to add her as a driver if she have a valid license. if she is on a permit, she wishes to be listed, but most companies won't rate her until she have a license. adding her to your policy will assist her get better rates then in duration. most states charge an inexperineced operator surcharge for anyone licensed smaller number than 3 years. the companies want her added because she has exposure to your coup¨¦ and if she does ever drive it she needs to be covered, and they integer if she lives in your home at some point she will drive your auto.
Because if she lives within your house and is a household member, you are responsible for any smash up she does while driving - even if it's on a secondary justification (which means, the policy of the vehicle she's driving pays first, then YOUR policy pays). So as long as the company have the possibility of paying out on a claim for her, they are allowed to charge for her.
The option is, specifically EXCLUDING her from coverage on your policy. That money, no matter what, no style, no how, will your policy pay for ANY LOSS of ANY KIND, where on earth she is involved driving. Even if she backs out of the driveway for you, and cracks up your sports car - they don't pay. She kill someone - they don't pay. YOU will terminate up writing the check.
If she REALLY doesn't drive . . . have her turn surrounded by her license, and then it's not a problem.
The idea the insurance company needs to know around every family contributor in your household who drives is because the insurance policy define every family beneficiary in your household who drives as an insured. This may be worded somewhat differently depending on your state but your insurance policy will have a partition where jargon used in the policy are defined. "Family member" is defined as "a entity related to you by blood, marriage or adoption who is a resident of your household. This includes a ward or foster child".
The liability clause of your policy (that part of your policy which pays for damages to others which an insured may raison d`¨ºtre through their negligence) states "We [being the insurance company] will pay for bodily injury or property break for which any insured becomes properly responsible because of an auto accident". It goes on to mark out an insured as, among other things, you or any family partaker.
You may be able to specifically exclude your child from coverage below your policy if you really don't want them on it but this would have to be done by a specific consent to the policy whereby your child is named and identified as a creature who will have NO coverage WHATSOEVER underneath your policy. This has to be done by backing because this is a change contained by the definitions surrounded by the policy, which I just described.
When insureds embargo to report all drivers within their household and then an unlisted driver cause an accident, they still come to the insurance company near their hand out, asking for coverage. People are repeatedly surprised to find out how much claims from automobile accidents can cost. You don't want to shoulder that burden. In some states, unlisted drivers surrounded by the insured's household are generally added to the policy and coverage is granted. In other states, however, insurance companies may snub to grant coverage. An underwrite review of the unlisted driver is performed and if the resulting premium increase from tally that unlisted driver to the policy is greater than some set amount (meaning the unlisted driver is a greater risk than the insurance company would have considered necessary to insure), the company may refuse coverage. They may also rescind the policy, objective the policy is made null and void entirely and at hand is no coverage whatsoever.
Quite often an unlisted driver surrounded by a household is unlisted precisely because the insured knows full powerfully that if the unlisted driver was added to the policy, it would increase the premium charge significantly. 16 year olds, drivers next to a DUI in their history, etc. are commonly the people who are unlisted. These types of drivers are the topmost risk to the insurance company to insure and that is why tally them to the policy costs more.
If your child has gotten her license, afterwards you need to join her to your insurance. This is due to the liability aspect of your policy, since your auto insurance covers each licensed driver for liability issues irrespective of the saloon being driven (i.e. when a sports car is rented or if you 'borrow' a friends car). If you have more licensed drivers than cars, spawn sure that she is not the 'primary driver' on any of them.
You have to attach her if she has a drivers' license, even though she's never going to drive your sports car, because the insurance company wants to cover the "what ifs" - what if there's an emergency and that's the solely car available? See what I plan?
shouldn't think you would hold to. Only if the child is going to drive the car. Generally the insurance you already enjoy covers learner drivers, but once they have their license they are not covered. If at hand is a chance of the child driving the vehicle then you would involve the cover in grip of accident as the insurance company will renege if she is not on the policy.
Why the small companies walk below as soon as their mound withdraw the credit string?
Question:
I am working on a case where on earth a lot of compnaies have gone under internationaly as soon as their financer/bank have withdrwan the financing. Pl. guide me with the reason ?
Answer:
Most small business are under capitalized to start beside. Many small business owners have no experience within cash flow regulation, budgeting or the proper use of credit.
As soon as the credit dries up, there is nought left within the bank so they fold.
Their operation were relying to heavily on the vein of credit for operating capital instead of downsizing their operation to man self-sufficient. Another reason is that the small business owner didn't take to mean that you need to reinvest surrounded by your company in proclaim to keep it going until it does show a surplus and is fit of paying dividends to it stakeholders, very commonly they believe that the company is doing well and can afford the owner to live more affluently than is really possible. I've see many businesses dance under because the owner is driving a BMW X5 and living contained by a $500K house, but they won't deprive themselves in decree to pay the company's cellular phone bill.
What state have the peak homeowners insurance premiums?
Question:
Answer:
I'm guessing either Florida or Texas - as contained by, highest premium per dollar of coverage.
California and Hawaii hold the highest priced homes, so those policies might enjoy a higher dollar amount of coverage, overriding to a higher premium.
Most places I enjoy checked states that Texas has the untouchable premiums.
probably Florida and the hurricane areas right now