What are some other question I should ask my financial advisor back I relay him he's fired?
Besides the followingUnder performance of souk benchmarks over the last 10 years.
High fees not compensated by over running of market
Fees / selling nightmarish when trying to integer out gains / losses for charge purposes
Lack of ability to manage a human after 5 p.m.
A voicemail system that has just one response in the bring to a close - dumping the call.
Unwillingness to acknowledge the problems.
Answers: Just move your justification and chalk up the experience as a good eduction surrounded by why you should manage your own finances. Then you own only yourself to blame, not a soul else.
Establish own financial advicing agency and make him an contribute!
;)
You should be your own financial advisor.
Can i hold a put and phone selection at same time...?
Hi i'm a newbee to options.can i hold a put buy and call buy on same stock simulaneously.
Let the stock is at 61$.
I buy a 60$ strike telephone option at 5$ and one 60$ put at 2$ premium.Is this possible ?.
What my investment will do after 1 week . if stock is at
1) 70 $
2) 50$
Answers: <<<can i own a put buy and call buy on same stock simulaneously.>>>
Yes.
If like strike price is used for both the call and the put it is call a "straddle".
If different strike prices are used for the call and the put it is call a "strangle".
If the strike price of the call is smaller amount than the strike price of the put it is sometimes called a "guts".
I'll repeat a quote I own given before from Natenberg's book "Option Volatility & Pricing" (page 187).
"While near is no substitute for experience, most traders quickly swot an important rule: straddles and strangles are the riskiest of adjectives spreads. This is true whether one buys or sells these strategies. New traders sometimes assume the purchase of straddles and strangles is not especially risky because such strategies enjoy limited risk. But it can be newly as painful to lose money afternoon after day when one buys a straddle or strangle and the open market fails to move, as it is to lose one and the same amount of money all at once when one sell a straddle and the market make a violent move. Of course, a trader who is right just about volatility can reap large rewards from straddles and strangles. But an experienced trader know that such strategies grant the least edge for error, and he will usually prefer other strategies with more desirable risk characteristics."
In that quote the phrase "straddles and strangles are the riskiest of adjectives spreads" is emphasized.
<<<Let the stock is at 61$.
I buy a 60$ strike phone option at 5$ and one 60$ put at 2$ premium.Is this possible ?.
What my investment will do after 1 week . if stock is at
1) 70 $
2) 50$>>>
The individual thing that can be said beside certainty is that the spread will be worth at lowest $10.00 in any case since it cannot be worth smaller amount than its intrinsic value. The exact helpfulness of the spread cannot be determined without knowing some other factor, such as the amount of time until expiration and the implied volatility of the options.
If you want to see what the convenience would be under different circumstances you can, at no cost, download the "option toolbox" software from the CBOE page
http://www.cboe.com/LearnCenter/Software...
That is called a straddle I believe. You are buying a send for at $60 and a put at $60. If the stock goes up you profit. If the stock go down you profit. Yes you can do that. If the stock does nothing, you loose.
If it go to 70, your 60 call is worth at tiniest 10. your put is worth nearly nothing so you enjoy made 3 10 - 7.
If it goes to 50, your call upon is worth almost nothing your put is worth 10. You own made 3 again 10-7. Perhaps a little more.
If the stock stays inwardly a range of 56 to 63 you loose.
WACC and Cost of Equity?
If a company has a WACC of 10.29% and a cost of equity of 12.25% what does this report to us of the companies financial strategy including the level of risk involved surrounded by the company? I am not sure I understand this but I thought the WACC should be difficult than the cost of equity for it to be a good risk...Answers: It money they have better financial leverage, becaues of high debt, a greater beta, and higher risk to proceeds. Using debt usually brings down the WACC but it adds financial leverage, difficult beta, and risk.