Investing Questions and Answers

Why did DJIA underperformed Apple and AT&T and why did it outperform G00GLE?

For my project we had to compare G00GLE, Apple and AT&T to DJIA and read aloud why it outperformed or underperformed. Formy G00GLE perforance i got that it underperformed DJIA, for Apple i get it outperformed JIA and for AT&T i got that it outperformed DJIA. I hold to state a reason as to why it underperformed or outperformed. why be people not prepared to buy G00GLE shares now. why are the those willing to buy AT&T and Apple. i own to make up a drive..can somebody help me plz....desperately waiting for ur answer...


Answers: your facts are incorrect, do more research.
Consider that the DJIA is an index of with the sole purpose thirty industrial stocks (out of how many thousand?). Also consider that Apple and AT&T are what one could consider mega panama companies, bohemoths, as it were. This scheme that, to turn a profit in these companies it will filch a huge earnings profit, huge Sales and Margin profit, and similar activities like these to get their share price rise appreciably. Now, consider that the DJIA is made up of thirty of those kinds of mega boater stocks? How much more does it have to achieve to rise appreciably. Yes it will rise, but it takes huge pains on the part of plentiful industries, not just the companies that are represented contained by the index. Now, take G00GLE. Yes its shares are especially expensive, but also consider that, by not diluting its shares by splits, it remains very small within relation to the DJIA. G00GLE is not a mega cap company approaching AT&T or Apple is. Its youth as a publicly traded company makes it still a more viable part to trade in that AT&T. So, it will more attractive and more institutional investors, investment companies, insurance companies (including world banks) will invest within it, thus driving its share price (because of the law of supply and demand) will rise appreciably.

I hope this help even a little.

Best of nouns with your project.

What's the best investment next to great returns?

I have $20,000. 00 contained by the bank, I want to invest it but I want the money to be available to thieve out anytime I need it short penalty.


Answers: If you ruminate you may need the money at any time, stocks are not the right choice -- you may be forced to deal in at the worst possible time. They're best for long-term investing.

This also rules out CDs since there is a cost for early cashout.

So your best bet is probably money bazaar funds. Check with a apposite comparison site to find the best rates -- I use
http://www.bankrate.com
How much of the money do you need to catch the money out? And how quickly?

Put it within an interest bearing internet reserves account and cooperation it to your regular savings reason. HSBC has 4.25%, which will be paid you about $850 surrounded by the 1st year. There are others that pay better interest, but near the fed adjectives rates all these accounts will be adjectives the rates they pay out to you.

Put it contained by a brokerage account, save 20% as cash contained by the account and buy point stocks with the rest. Link that to your ridge account. Sell the stock when you have need of cash. Caveat is the stocks may be smaller quantity than you paid for them when you involve to sell them so you may not know how to get the entire $20K at a moment's thought.
This one is easy. Invest surrounded by Silver, often call "the poor man's gold". Silver used to be a monetary metal, and maybe some light of day it will be again. I've recommended silver before, and presently I'm going to recommend silver again. Back in 1980, gold ingots sold for 850 and silver sold for 50. Then, one ounce of gold would buy 17 ounces of silver. Today near gold hard by 900, one ounce of gold will buy a whopping 55 ounces of silver. It seem to me that silver, in vocabulary of gold, is "too cheap." You can buy silver using symbol SLV.

What online discount broker would be best if I considered necessary to buy stock contained by IPO's & Mutual Funds?

I'm looking into getting an online broker, but I want to be able to buy stock within IPO's when they first hit the market as powerfully as a few No-Load mutual funds? Although I'm open to others, so far I've given serious consideration to:

1) Zecco.com
2) Scottrade
3) E*Trade
4) TD Ameritrade
5) Fidelity

I'll probably start the sketch with $2,500 and attach $500 a month. I'm looking at putting most of my $ into Mutual Funds but I want the IPO option at smallest available. I don't want to waste money on an outfit that charges $20+ per trade, as that'll put away up a significant portion of my capital.

I'd appreciate any recomendations, thoughts or chronological experiences, both good and impossible you'd like to share.

thankyou


Answers: I've be a Fidelity customer for 20 years and would recommend them. I've never had any problems, stock trades are executed swiftly, and they have a big selection of no-load funds, including funds from other companies.

You probably won't know how to subscribe to IPOs with a small portrayal. Many are oversubscribed, so brokerages hold the shares for their best customers (large balances and frequent traders). That's probably newly as well. Many IPOs budge down after they start trading, so you can often buy the shares cheaper a couple of months following. Check with the brokers that you are considering for their exact requirements.
I use ingdirect for stash, then I started buying mutual funds near them last may. I find it reasonably easy, not plentiful fees, but you have to do your homework on the funds! I use yahoo nouns for most of my research. I noticed they are doing $4 stock trades in a minute. You might check them out.

www.ingdirect.com

The entirety of this site is protected by copyright © 2008. All rights reserved. RunEye.com