Is this the best stock for 2007 ?
Question:
Thjs is my pick for 2007
Stock ticker PBLS.
8 Hrs minimum dd - dont just answer this interrogate with a immediate glance and comment -
Look at the Company.
I own over 3000 hrs of research and DD in this issue.
It is at a penny because they own not filed contained by 8 years. They will file hasty 2007.
The stock info on yahoo for this issue is not correct the SEC filings listed within are some other companies.
Here is a link to the end investor update.
Look at it closely
I reiterate Anyone that does not spend the time to do some research and due diligents please dont reply to this question.
Like I said every bit of information that this company have put out in this PR 's and others is verifyable on political affairs websites.
Link to shareholders update 9/26/06
http://www.pbls.biz/pressrelease_content...
8 hrs minimum DD to know this company.
Answer:
Sounds like you're pumping and possibly dumping.
I'm looking at Yahoo (yhoo); Microsoft (MSFT); GM; Flamel (FLML);
Reynolds Tobacco (RAI).
Good luck.
i own seen this post several times here, i of late dont believe you put three THOUSAND hours in to look at a penny stock
First you do not enjoy 3000 hours of dd on this site. I don't think any stock at .012 is worth investing contained by. Only place to go is .00
Good Luck
Is it possible (if not, why) to relation the proceeds per share to the book convenience per share, profitability
Question:
Is it possible (if not, why) to link the profits per share to the book value per share, profitability ratio, asset turnover and a measure of leverage??
Answer:
That's what the Dupont Return on Equity formula does. See connection below for derivation of formula.
It is not possible because share prices are determined by the collective influence of lots of shareholders. Although plentiful of these will trade the shares in such a method that share prices are related to profitability, assets etc there are tons others who use many other unrelated factor in their trading decision such as emotions, systematic analysis, insider information (e.g. they think that subsequent years profits will be down). So actual share prices tend to be chaotic.
Actually your press is whether earnings and book importance show positive or negative correlation. The answer would be not really and it drastically much depends on your industry.
First of all, look , do you want to have lofty book value to be profitable or your yield to grow? Not really. Market factors (demand side) plays a far more key role.
Besides, in some industries book advantage determines your earnings potential, contained by others don't/ Think of mining and tourinsm.
Book value is total pro of assets, earnings are , very well, earnings. They are totally different measures of expediency. You can have a company near vitually no book value, contained by other words have little within assets but still make money, ie services. So, nearby really is no positive correlation. However any company with assets may enjoy a potential to make returns, therefore importance investors may look at high book expediency per share even thought there are no or little proceeds. This may portend better days to come, or if new running is formed a better ROA, return on assets may be achieved. However, growth investors tend to focus on yield only.
An example of a elevated book value but no profits may be the oil company not surrounded by production. They have greatly of 'proven and probable' resources in the ground as ably as equipment. That should technically add to book effectiveness. However, if they are not pulling it out of the ground in a profitable mode, then income are negative.
Where is a worthy website to find efficacy of sporadic coins? Or does anyone know the meaning of Silver dollars dated be
Question:
dated between 1885 and 1921? Thanks for the help.
Answer:
I resembling to use Heritagecoin.com. Once you have a user first name you can check old auction archives for what coins go for. It also shows numismedia's published values but auction values are more reliable. Heritage is the largest rare coin auction house.
http://search.ebay.in/_coins-notes...
look at the price guide at PCGS.com. Hereitage is also right. Remember the "grade" is very high-status. A grade of MS65 vs MS64 can penny-pinching $150K verse $15K
The implication of the bank sector over the commercial sector have a P/E multiple of 42% and 73%?
Question:
Hi, If analysts observed that the ratio of the price-earnings multipliers of the banking sector over the commercial sector have been between 42% and 73%; what are the implication (if any) for the banking industry?
Hope someone can backing interpret this! Happy New Year!
Answer:
I wish I could. I too hold noticed that. I ponder the reason is this. Investors are expecting the bank sector to grow about 50% faster than the rest of the cutback. They also expect that the banking sector will own more stable earnings operation. Think of it this way. With the Indian cutback growing so rapidly and beside all the construction that requirements to be done, who stands to benefit the most. The answer is the portion of the economy explicitly going to finance the growth.
It method the market (ie the majority of investors) expect the bank sector to do much better than the commercial sector in the practical term. So the bank sector is more expensive in writ to balance the risk/reward ratio.
Any recommendation for programs that analyze historical stockpicking?(perform./ volatility/ risk adj. return)
Question:
I'm an active trader seeking to evaluate my investment track dictation. Any off the shelf software recommendation would be appreciated. Thanks.
Answer:
There are many, but adjectives of the one's I have prearranged of are proprietary and developed by the individual firms themselves. I know of none that are 'off-the-shelf' as the target market is too small to be profitable for the software maker. But that doesn't mean in that isn't one out there somewhere.
You might want to bring a look at http://www.top10traders.com - this is a free site that lets you create a portfolio of stocks next to $100,000 in "play" money. Each afternoon the site ranks the best performing portfolios, so you can see how your picks perform compared to other investors. You can also read posts on investing from the best traders, as okay as share your own investing ideas. There is also a charting point , so you can see how your portfolio performs compared to the S&P 500.
Here are this month's best traders:
http://www.top10traders.com/top10standin...
Hope this help.
Vodafone to receive $19 bn bid for Hutch?
Question:
A chinease making monkey from Indian telecom operations?
Answer:
yes.
is it wrong, a Chinese cannot invest contained by India.
think again what be the our condition in 1990s
What are stocks? (as surrounded by Stock Exchange)?
Question:
How can I play the STOCK TRADING GAME?
as it is on http://www.pse.ph/html/stg/index.html...
tell me more nearly Stocks,
also visit http://www.pse.com.ph
Answer:
this could serve
http://money.howstuffworks.com/stock.htm...
Stocks are an ownership "share" of an individual company. The company sells stock to put on a pedestal capital for a mixture of corporate uses including expansion, & research.
Some companies don't have stock. They are referred to as privately held companies.
The efficacy of a stock rises or falls as the business climate for that firm varies. ( among several other reason, including interest rates, government regulation, & public perception of the firm)
See yahoofinance.com for more detailed info on any individual stock or company. Good Luck!!
Look up wikipedia.com! scour for ''stock''!
The Stock Market is not a game.
How can I total what percentage of total risk is systematic risk, and what percentage is specific risk?
Question:
I calculated the Microsoft betas for MSCI World (0.898) and S&P 500 (1.032), so I know what is the "better" choice of market portfolio but I hold no idea how to total the percentages of risk... Thx within advance!
Answer:
Since you know how to add beta then required rate of return Ks=krf+beta(km-krf) where on earth,
Ks=equity return
km=market return
krf=discount rate
In this you see two risk factors the systematic risk which is compensated by krf and the non-systematic risk or company specific risk which is compensated by beta(km-krf).
So once you integer out Ks using the above formula, sutract krf from it to get the percentage of non systematic or company specific risk compensation. Usually this company specific risk can be diversified away using a portfolio of cyclical and non cyclical stocks.
never ask such f---ing question in interesting things approaching this.
How to invest contained by mutual funds, stocks, bonds, or Treasury bills and securities?
Question:
Do I have to diversify or focus within one investment?
Answer:
First u have 2 wish how much return u want in a year?
Suppose u r inclined just 6 % return on ur investment afterwards u invest in govt. mound deposits-these r totally safe & gooey.
But if u want to earn 25% or 50% in a year,afterwards u have2 search avenues which give such returns last year & expected 2 repeat the results.
So post such question in RunEye.com2 know contained by which part of world u can double ur money within what?
then evaluate the answers concerning feasibility, liquidity and safty.
i know here contained by my town i double my money in 2 years within property investment, so if u want2 join u r meet.
invest in fortune cookies
First, you shouldn't be investing unless you are debt-free and hold 3 to 6 months expensives SAVED. For more complete information visit daveramsey.com and read his book The Total Money Makeover. Good Luck
Depends on if your a conservative investor or an aggressive one an alive one or a passive one.
In other words, the answer is too complicated and that's something you'll enjoy to decide for yourself.
You can do adjectives at once by getting a fund that has multiple name like lifestyle/target fund ect. Generally they enjoy the year in which you are expected to retire. The fund next changes ratio of stocks and bonds as it gets closer to that date. A stock broker over the phone can obtain you those seperately. If you want U.S. federal bonds, you can go to www.usbonds.gov.
Which one is better surrounded by Forex Trading ? Technical or Fundamental Analysis ? Why ?
Question:
Answer:
Which is better an arm or a leg? You need both, preferrably both of both, but my father lost one of his and did okay short the full set--but it was sturdy. The technicals keep you from buying or selling at stupid times, when the tide of trading is against you, it is against you and you lose. The fundamentals report to you, largely, why things may or may not go this mode or that. Knowing the kinds of report and rationale behind the marketing movings explains or reinforces the precise, which is often the irrational and moving side of the market. Just as what go on between your ears, you have common sense and passion and how you stability those makes adjectives the difference. (BTW Forex is pretty chancy, even for accomplished traders, so mind your Ps and Qs that you don't 'bet the farm', okay?)
If you have to ask, stay away from Forex or only set your money on fire, it will end longer that way.
Look into systematic analysis for stocks.
I prefer a trading system based on nought analysis. You can do backtesting and forward demo accounts, I haven't been competent to figure out a means of access to lose money with this system. Call me or email me, I will receive you all of the information. Cost is low, you can even try a free 15 year demo.
Eric
1-651-303-3439
forexmn@gmail.com
www.freedomrocks.com/informati... that's information
A) In something like daytime trading the Forex markets, fundamentals are petty because the values change every second. It is a technicians orb game.
YOU COULD SEE THESE:
ENTER HERE
http://e-golddailypro.biz/?ref=16908...
TO MORE INFORMATION CONTACT ME.
tupropiadesicion@yahoo.com
Actually its a bit bit of both. But if you are like contained by and out of the market past a fundamental news can hold any serious impact fundamentally, then use controlled analysis. Say news for example. There will be millions of race reacting to the word base on their position and circumstances. And which communication will have a fundamental impact one and only time can tell. It take time for things to develop. However, if you are a position holder and can take a strategic vista of things and dont mind the hourlies or even dailies and monthlys ups and downs and willing to budge on the fundamental change to be exact bound to happen, after go for positioning. Even later, technical anaylsis is within place just look at a bigger time frame chart. Like monthly, quarterlies and time that beside fundamentalism. Soon you ill integer out a style of your own.
Should Alan Greenspan shut up?
Question:
Personally, I think it's wrong for the former Fed Chairman to rock the market with his public musings - he have to be making it hard for Bernanke. The ripened coot had his moment contained by the sun; now he should restrain his ego and agree to Ben have a shot at keeping things on track.
Answer:
Yea he should be barely audible for a while because he should realize he still has the facility to move markets. This is ridiculous. Everyday he say something else. Now he says a 10% increase within house prices will end the subprime worries. No kid, wouldn't that be nice? I don't know what he is smoking. It might be the book he is comming out with.
In my roll of all the ethnic group who should shut up, Greenspan is pretty far down near the bottom. Ann Coulter, however, is pretty effective the top.
That old coot is probably the single most influential individual concerning American domestic financial policy - arguably topping Bernanke.
I suppose you didn't like his recession warning which caused the marketplace to dip. Deal with it. He's a private citizen and is entitled to his evaluation. Of course, after 20 years heading the Fed and a long and distinguished economics career, his opinion matter - unlike ours.
Stop whining and show for a time respect.
Hmmmmm. Should someone who is regarded as one of the most knowledgable economists within the world keep his opinion to himself?
Uh, NO!!!
No, the more information and opinions I can procure, then the better. Anyway, nobody really know if Greenspan is influencing the market. There are so masses other factors resembling the carry trade, liquidity wishes and so, so, so many other factor.
I agree I always insufferable that dick He just like to screw every thing up.
It used to be the custom for those going away positions of power to keep out of the limelight for a time. This have been without being seen by politicians for the past few years and apparently very soon also by Greenspan. He was so decisive in his tenure that his voice still carry considerable weight. Now he does not enjoy the political constraints that he did while in bureau. He should exercise the same judiciousness contained by his choice of words now as he did as the principal of the Fed. Bernanke had a rocky start beside conflicting speeches from various hill heads but have settled in impartially well in a minute.
Why do I want a financial advisor or a due advisor for that event?
Question:
I have a 401K , a Roth IRA and some stash. I am in my mid forties.
Answer:
I would recommend an advisor to facilitate put all the pieces together. Go to one that will not charge you for helping put a financial plan together. Make sure they are an independent advisor and be upfront for what you want them to give support to you with.
Tell them you want to hack it your own money but you need sustain to accomplish your goals. Even if you reflect on you don't need backing the advisor may see something you didn't know or never considered.
Everyone needs serve in the risk supervision department of keeping what you have contained by the case of an emergency. Independent advisors roughly will guide you in the process to protect your natural life savings. If you ever grain they are trying to sell you something you don't have a feeling comfortable about or you do not follow, find a new advisor to ask their inference.
So what's to lose by having a professional surrounded by your corner helping with suggestion that they work on everyday. You just requirement to know the correct questions to ask the advisor.
By the method you will need an advisor when you do retire. Why not start to establish a relationship in a minute. Ask for referrals from friends, nearest and dearest and people you respect.
Good luck at set those goal for 2007 high. It's going to be a great year.
You don't call for one... they are parasites and nurture off of people's fears...
you may or may not want one, but to say they are a moment ago parasites is in the dark
if you are doing well and guess you are ok to go for retirement you probably dont inevitability one, you are in your mid forties, how is your investment plan going? what types of funds are you investing surrounded by?
I had a financial advisor for a while, but I found I could control my investments myself. Nowadays you have access to things resembling eTrade and Merrill Lynch online where you can look into your accounts at any time. Usually your investment strategy won't translate but every few years, and in that valise you really don't need one, unless you regulation it on a regular basis. Of course, if I come into a lot of money I might hire one!
I don't dream up you need a financial advisor, unless your advisor can prove that he/she can outperform most other investors surrounded by the market. At http://www.top10traders.com you can see what stocks the best investors are buying and selling. Top10Traders is a free site that let you create a portfolio of stocks with $100,000 contained by "play" money. Each day the site ranks the best performing portfolios, so you can see how your picks get something done compared to other investors. You can also read posts on investing from the best traders, as well as share your own investing accepted wisdom. There is also a charting feature , so you can see how your portfolio perform compared to the S&P 500.
Here are this month's best traders:
http://www.top10traders.com/top10standin...
Hope this helps.
If you hire a Financial Advisor as soon as you finish your MBA consequently you will become a Millionaire by the time you are 35 and you won't have to work anymore.
If you hire a Tax Advisor you income less money to Uncle Sam.
Was December a unpromising month for forex traders?
Question:
I've heard a few traders influence they were down contained by dec. Was the market roughly "anti-predictable" during the month, resulting in losses?
Answer:
Traditionally December is a low volume month contained by terms of foreign exchange. Most folks are not traveling over seas for the holidays, and copious traders are not trading as much the last 2 weeks of the month.
Here is a join to a forum that discuss's forex trading. There are some good traders here:
http://talkgold.com/forum/f19-.html...
December be a great month for me. I made $2,997 on an investment of $5,000 using the FreedomRocks program. When I came across FreedomRocks I be skeptical to say the lowest possible. However, there be a free demo and I took advantage. Within a few short minutes I be making live trades in the flea market with falsified money. The best part be I had certainly no prior trading experience. The FreedomRocks program truly does 95% of the work for you, and I only spend roughly speaking 20-30 minutes per week managing my portfolio. To get your free demo travel to www.simple4xinvesting.com. I think you will be favorably impressed. Feel free to beckon me with any question.
Best Regards
Chris Thomas
541-554-8140
www.simple4xinvesting.com
ctppl541@yahoo.com
What is the no brainer stock pick of 2008? Last year I go G00GLE and Exxon and did ably.?
Question:
What key events are occuring this year that kind this stock a no brainer. Please give some support for your response. Also, tag on a price target if you have one. Lastly, enumerate any sources if you have them.
Answer:
self help u but RunEye.com isnt the place for investing tips
Ford.
this year in that will be great advances within the alterative fule production in Ford motor co
Me avoids this type of insider information, dont want to conclusion up like Martha Stewart.
But accurate luck in your quest, do lots of research and accurate luck.
I don't know but it appears to me that General Electric might be an interesting stock. They are looking to acquire a huge Aerospace company according to rumor. Might happen, might not. Keep your eyes on them.
no brainer - the grease stocks are depressed right now after the elections a few months ago and the inventories go up...
now, the inventories are slowly going down, OPEC is looking to brand major cuts surrounded by production, the elections are long over and the democrats won big-time, and the US$ is devaluing - the definite no-brainer is to buy grease stocks and funds and just sit and continue for the next leading run-up (which will probably come soon)
buy infy(infosys tech.) for more gains within 2007 and 2008
If you think that worldwide warming is going to be a big issue, consequently you might want to take a look at Energy Conversion Devices, ENER. they brand name solar panels, battery for hybrids, and a hydrogen storage system. Any price target would be pure speculation. Here is a link:
http://www.top10traders.com/viewpost.asp...
This interconnect is from http://www.top10traders.com - this is a free site that lets you create a portfolio of stocks beside $100,000 in "play" money. Each daylight the site ranks the best performing portfolios, so you can see how your picks perform compared to other investors.
Hope this help.
hell yes exxon mobil did well over 30 percent gain i made a ton of money on exxon this year
Is it true that the sophisticated the risk of investment, the superior the returns and yield?
Question:
Im a small investor? Is this saying true to corporate and individual investors?
Answer:
If you overpay for an investment, afterwards you are usually taking more risk than you have to for a lower return. If you are paying huge loads (commissions) for mutual funds, or if you gain involved with something you haven't researched or couched, you may well be taking more risk than you should for smaller number return.
Corporate investors usually have spent deeply more time studying investments, so they are less credible to overpay for something they haven't done enough homework on. From plentiful years of watching message boards, I can tell you that individual investors usually know far smaller amount than they give themselves credit for. Corporate investors own professionals who understand the proper rank of due diligence.
However, getting away from mistakes from not having done plenty homework...are there ways for general public to get highly developed rates of return while taking less risk? Finance have what is known as simplified market argument, which basically say all assets are properly priced, and you can't carry an edge, no event how much research you do. Most of the financial world says this is true...at hand are a few who think these folks are nuts. Lest you believe the few are totally crazy, the leading critics of this hypothesis are a couple of guys named Warren Buffett and Charlie Munger (Charlie is Warren's smaller amount well prearranged partner at Berkshire Hathaway). Warren is considered by many to be the world's greatest investor. I ruminate most successful investors have a problem beside this theory. Being I bring in part of my living from trading, I don't agree near efficient open market theory.
In my view, investing is a skill like any other. Some population are going to be better at it than others. If you are looking for the easy path to make outsize returns...I would voice there isn't one. There are methods that don't whip long once you thoroughly understand them, but near is a steep learning curve to carry to that point, and it will take greatly of work. I think within are only a few individuals who can consistently beat the souk. There have be studies done that show that even fairly long occupancy successful records aren't necessarily predictive of adjectives success. One study I remember reading said that singular 16% of mutual funds that were within the top 10% for one ten year period would be near for the next decade (this study required that the funds be within existence for all of the subsequent decade).
The people who are battering the market hold put a lot of time and go into understanding what is going on. However, I also meditate it is a lot easier for a small investor to tempo the market than a huge investor. The reason is that the more money you own to invest, the more you have to invest surrounded by any one position. Larger purchases and sales move the souk more. If you are trying to invest billions of dollars, you have profoundly fewer choices than someone trying to invest thousands of dollars. The companies that are too small for the institutions provide ample opportunity for those who are liable to get their hand dirty, and really understand what is going on. There are oodles studies out there that influence most people who try trading on their own will fall through, and as I said earlier, most individual investors greatly underestimate how much information and work it'll appropriate to really understand what is going on. However, what most critics miss is that the studies say-so most, not all, of the populace who try to be active investors will founder...so it is possible to succeed. What I think make the difference between the winners and the losers is the winner enjoy the study process, and enjoy getting surrounded by and doing the research. What I think investors enjoy to decide is whether they are liable to put in the try to succeed. For me, I always considered investing a hobby, and the money be always inferior. I enjoyed the aspect of playing the activity. If you are this sort of person, and you want to dance on your own, I'd say make available it a shot. If you are just looking for an flowing way of making more money, I'd enunciate stick to standard investments...index funds and the like...you'll expected give up beforehand you learn what you inevitability to in lay down for you to have a hit and miss. Of course, you can also piggyback on someone like Warren, who have a fantastic track record over several decades. To me, Berkshire Hathaway is the exception to the rule of long permanent status track records not gist a lot. They've done so okay for so long...there have to be some extraordinary skill level nearby.
I am an individual investor, and YES that is awfully true!
Well sort of. The higher the risk, the difficult the return CAN be. When you invest in risky stock, nearby is good arbitrary you will loose the money you invested. If the risky stock pays off, afterwards the return would be higher than a safer stock. So be wary investing in risky stock.
Generally yes.
Investors want to be rewarded for taking on risk. Otherwise they will pick another investment.
For a small investor, you will see that large growth mutual funds will have dramatic fluctations, but the upside swings are usually greater than the downside.
It is across the world true, because often you run the risk of losing division or all of your initial investment surrounded by high risk vehicle. Soooothey will offer highly developed returns to try and offset the risk of losing your wherewithal.
simply "YES"
Yes but with the complex risk there are negative as well. Be sure and do your research past you jump contained by read blogs for the company on yahoo and investment sites sometimes you get fitting forth coming info. on issues not visible from the picture that the company paints, lots of faceless whistle blowers, but use in attendance info. cautiously as resourcefully some have concealed agendas.
Yeah sure is, just close to everything else in natural life, the bigger the risk the bigger the reward.
The trick in investment is to find a harmonize. Its called diversifying.
When investing mix dignified risk investments with low risk ones to neutralize any potential big losses.
Its as the saying go don't put all your eggs contained by one basket.
Get an economics essay to get more details. Check an one by the author Beardshaw. (don't remember his first name)
Actually, it is false. Investments are "risky" because the general public who look at them think investing is risky. Investing is NOT risky. To not invest is the actual risky section. What the big investors do is to mitigate their risk according to the investment. People who are successful in investments look at every single aspect of the investment formerly jumping into it. They also enjoy control over their money. This is the biggest problem with America today: family are too scared to invest (hence, lose control) because they estimate it's too risky. They, in turn, invest not to lose. This is the biggest difference between winner and losers. Winners invest to win.
I would suggest reading books on finances. The big thing to do though is to do some intrspet on your own existence and see where you stand. This does not be determined to see how much money you have or are making but how YOU display money. What you should first ask yourself is WHY do you want to invest and go from at hand? You should also start by learning what is an asset and a liability, what is money, and how do your emotion come into investing. BTW, if you are going to be an "average" investor then you will enjoy "average" or small returns. Learn and grow. It all starts near you. Take care.
Caveat: If you really want to breed it as an investor, DO NOT diversify. This term is used for those who are afraid and do not want to lose. A title holder knows that to win he might lose and he learn to control that. Focus on one area and dance for it.
Yes , it is a true statement. The Securities Exchange Commission (SEC) requires High Risk Investors be accredited.
Smaller Investors usually work through Investment Brokers. who will mostly pool investments into a group - then craft a larger investment into the High Risk Project. Your % of return is somewhat higher but not reasonably as High as if you could invest as an individual , for clear reasons. I hope this help
Theoretically yes! Absolutely
According to academics, yes. Moreove, if you invest short careful research, your investments plausible would be in the glorious risk, no returns category.
I highly recommend "The little book that beat the market" by Joel Greenblatt.
Yes.