Dividend growth model?
Question:
Okay, so here is some info on a start up company...
-total after tax profits $2million in 2006.
(25% remunerated as dividend, 75% retained for financing)
-Payout policy will remain unchanged for 2 years (incl. 2007), after which it will retain with the sole purpose 40% of after tax returns.
-Company earnings will grow at a rate of 50% per yr starting presently (beginning of 07') for a duration of 3 years.
-After which, company will grow at a rate of 8% per year forever after.
-Company's cost of equity = 15%.
Now- I need to use the Dividend growth model (as of jan 07') to find the helpfulness.
Also- I need to find the unusual value, assuming that the cost of equity during the dignified risk start up years (1 and 2) is really 20% and 15% thereafter...
Can anyone help?
Thanks!
Answer:
Sure.
You call for the present value of the dividends from 2007, 2008 and 2009. Then you will inevitability the present value of the terminal utility which is from 2010 forward.
So the first three pieces are:
Year Earnings Dividend PV
2007 3000000 750000 652,174
2008 4500000 1125000 850,662
2009 6750000 4050000 2,662,941
Then the terminal value is
62,485,714.29. Discounted stern 3 years it is 41,085,371.44.
Adding up your present values give you an intrinsic significance of $45,251,147.72 for the firm. If you have a # of shares outstanding, a short time ago divide the intrinsic value by shares outstanding to receive a value per share.
My portfolio is up 23.5% this year so far..am I whipping the overall stock bazaar?
Question:
? where do I find out?
Answer:
Yes you are hiding the overall market.
DJIA on 12/23/06 12343
DJIA on 12/30/05 10717
It is up 15.7%
NASDQ on12/23/06 2401
NASDQ on 12/31/05 2205
It is up 4.3%
S&P 500 on 12/23/06 1410
S&P 500 on 12/31/05 1248
It is up 13%
You haven't overcome me.
Depends on how you define "the market". The DOW is up around 14% for the year, and NASDAQ is up around 10%, so you're ahead of those.
The best indexes for the overall stock market surrounded by the US are the S&P 500 (GSPC) and the Wiltshire 5000 (DWC) Both are up around 11.2%, so you did much better than the overall market.
Use Yahoo Finance charts. The beta newspaper has excellent graphs.
'The DJIA deal with simply 30 companies and is not really all that close to the overall open market.
You've done very economically. Congratulations. I've consulted today's Wall Street Journal as well as today's New York Times, and here isn't a single "major stock index of US stocks" that have done as well as you year-to-date. Sure, here are a few foreign stock markets that own done better than you but there are more that haven't matched yours.
However, beforehand you get overly confident, read more in the region of "risk-adjusted returns." It's possible that your results this year reflects more luck than skill. I would urge you to remember that lifelong investment nouns usuallly comes from a diversified portfolio reflecting high standard investments. Read "Bogle on Funds" by John Bogle.
That is very accurate results.
My last few years be 26%, 48%, 17%---then came this year!
I be up 17.5% on May 9th 2006 and it plummeted to 0.0% I was starchy in Canadian Trust, Speculative Oil, Palladium & Platimum stocks and masses "momentum" ones with illustrious Price/Earnings ratios.
Consequently, I will finish this year at something like 5%(about like the NAS exchange).
I get a little too cocky on the P/E and momentums this year. But I still made $55,000 contained by the market--2006-- because of the great years I have other had contained by the past. It is adjectives relative!
Are you serious?
You should find out what is your risk adjusted return, that is to say what matters the most...not your total return
The S&P 500 has a beta of 1 and as mentioned it is up 13%..
Now find out what is ur portfolio beta and consequently use the CAPM equation to see what the expected return should be on your portfolio.
Re= Rf + beta * market premium
If your return is more than the expected return i would influence u have done a gr8 work..cheers..
check the site morning star to know more
hope that helps
congrats. vastly fine. beat again contained by 2007
what company owns G00GLE.com?Is stock public or private?
Question:
Is stock public or private?
Answer:
The company is now public. The company is G00GLE.
G00GLE is owned by G00GLE INC, scheduled on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol GOOG
http://www.G00GLE.com/corporate/index.ht...
http://investor.G00GLE.com/
G00GLE owns G00GLE.com. The stock is public and its ticker symbol is GOOG.
Public : GOOG
What would be the stock projections for the 2007 initiation?
Question:
What would be the stock projections for the 2007??
Would there be increase surrounded by sensex???
http://www.netjobs4all.com?id=110076...
Answer:
go up, step up and go up till Feb 28
will be some improovment
We again expect a bull run within the start of the 2007, Till feb 207 prior to the budget we may see the all time soaring of the BSE.
Buy only selective sensex stocks.
Happy Investing.
What would be the projection for the One India Mutual Fund by SBI??
Question:
Answer:
One India mutual fund is a NFO which closed for IPO on 22nd DEC. Now if wil take around 3 months for the applications to be processed/units allotted/certificqtes made/sent to investors, and after the process of fund Utilization starts, One the fund has be allotted in multiple sectors of the marketplace then merely the results can be tracked, Stil, we expect 30% annualised return in this fund.
HAPPY INVESTING.
ENJOY THE MARKET.
Do not start counting the ceremonial of mutual fund from day one.
If the intention is to benefit from growth opportunity offered by the Indian economy, why restrict the fund manager's foot by imposing restrictions surrounded by the form of regional allocations. Wouldn't a free-flowing investment style better suit the fund?
The guidelines say that the fund invest 15-55 % to respectively of four region. That means the fund principal is struck with minimum 15% compulsory investment even if one of the region is giving poor result and at same time another region is booming. (I own lost the brochure of the fund, it has programmed all the companie from respectively region in which the fund will invest)
However, at hand is nothing important in the fund, better to skip.
You can find more details here...
Which would be the super power surrounded by ITIndia or China?
Question:
Which would be the super power in ITIndia or China??
Based on the stride of development within IT between these two countries.Which would emerge as ultimate???
http://www.netjobs4all.com?id=110076...
Answer:
It will be India for at smallest 20 years, there are plentiful reason. China enjoy money to invest but the soft skills like English, Knowledge of Western Culture, Project supervision skills, etc. required, in IT are not slickly acquirable. They take within own time to develop. So China may not be there contained by near adjectives. Biggest Chinese IT company's turnover is not more than $300 m whereas TCS $4bn. IT service industry require scale which Indians own. Indians look smart enough also to be capable of set up shops around world like contained by China, Brazil, East Europe. So in to hand future it's India solitary
china first.
then india.
later africa.
each nation learn from the other and then outdoes them
unsurprisingly INDIA
China - they are investing more in infrastructure and hold a far better understanding of characteristic. India is a very strong player but their strong position relies on two advantages:
- COST - this is anyone eroded all the time as salary increase 10-15% / year for skilled professionals and it is harder and harder for indian IT firms to find people.
- ENGLISH - Indians tend to speak English. This control is decreasing for two reasons 1) chinese individuals are learning english more and more and 2) as China become richer and has a stronger domestic bazaar the global primacy of English become weaker and so being competent to work in that terms becomes a poorer advantage.
But we enjoy to remember that neither country has even so to produce a global software player - adjectives they do right now is develop code according to requirements defined within the West - they're essentially sweatshops for cheap products as Japan was surrounded by the 60s and China was surrounded by the 90s. What is yet to transpire is a global trendsetter emerging from either of these countries who define what peopls *want* - a Microsoft, Apple, Borland, Sun, IBM or HP.
Companies like Wipro and Tata are doing fantastically resourcefully and giving Accenture and IBM a run for their money - but what they're actually doing is helping companies similar to GE, Unilever and Coca Cola more successful - when the Indian Microsoft comes along, that's when things will really begin to convert.
Just my 2p worth - your mileage may differ etc...
china
india
I would say China
Short residence (foreseeable future) India for reasons described above.
Longer permanent status is anyone's guess.
in software india by hardware china
i would say-so india's orissa
To be a world leader contained by IT (I'm talking software), english would be primary expression - otherwise no one else within the world can use the tech anyways and the amount of money that can be earned by the technology would be less. Indian students revise english in sizeable numbers. Hell, they are graduating 300,000 US lawyer a year in India alone. They are also awfully strong into IT and have tons software programmers, duh.
Main reason within the end, adjectives the outsourcing for IT jobs go to India. Large numbers of them even speak the international language of business (English). I ruminate language barrier are one problem plagging China from taking some of that outsourcing market from India. Yes, lots of culture in China speak English, but I reflect on percentage wise it is plentifully higher within India. There are also government interferences. They can't even surf the internet lacking it being filtered/monitored. No freedom of expression = creativity is hindered. Creativity drives most inventions and advancement. Not saying here aint no creativity... it's just hindered a bit. China is the troublemaker when it comes to manufacturing... hand down!
I guess technically they are both super powers in IT. That's my final answer.
china
For human being super power in IT-Softwares India will be the commander as the China is facing too much problems in Software developments due to langugage, They May conquer us in IT-Hardware, But surrounded by the term of software we will remain commanding officer.
INDIA..
INDIA..
INDIA..
hi,ERIC sir.how r u .
the answer to u r question is Really INDIA ia the foremost and worthful sources in IT while compare to china.i my view with contained by few years INDIA is having more valubule resoures than china.one of the primary influences factors are :
1.Most of the INDIANS are prearranged Engish this one of the advantge to us.
2.Technical skills in computerprograming.
3.Hardworking
4.Respective , Responsibul & Reliable citizens .
5.Task acheving people.
Here is a moment or two inside information. In the future, it will be vietnam. Intel have just invested 1 billion us into vietnam and Bill Gates in recent times visited. Also, The labor force surrounded by vietnam is cheap as well as Highly literary. Vietnam is banking on IT within the future and I predict it will outstrip India and China.
its a simple questin answer is india
Help! I don't recognize what "ex-dividend" funds? My mutual fund (MGEMX) took a trunk dive 2 days ago.
Question:
Like a lot of general public, I invested in mutual funds through one form or another contained by order to supplement my allowance. The trouble is I don't have a level in nouns, and nobody really ever explains the intracasies of these things when you're buying them. Admittedly, I am a financial moron. OK, now my ask is this. Everyone tells you not to do this, but the inate gambler contained by me is still sore about losing so much currency in 2001. Therefore, end August with lone 8 months before my retirement, I settled to pool all my money into a volitail international/emerging bazaar fund (Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets - MGEMX) and hoped to regain some of my loss. The fund was doing excellent till Thursday when it took a huge drop. Somebody told me the judgment this mutual fund dived so low was that it be "ex-dividending." Not knowing the first thing abiout what that finances I pulled all my money out and put it contained by a safe reason till I figure what to do subsequent. Can somebody explain to me what happened?
Answer:
Don't have a feeling bad. The merely thing you enjoy lost is the movement in the fund until you return with back within, that's assuming the fund moves higher during your "not detrimental haven" time. If it moves lower prior to a re-entry you might feel approaching a market guru. I panic like you, but I did contact Morgan Stanley at their 800 number and get the info to calm me down. I very soon have more shares and hope to benefit surrounded by the 1st quarter by the shares moving back to the pre-dividend importance, not that there is any guarantee of that arranged. Emerging market funds come across to be on a good footing going forward surrounded by '07, but the valuations are high-ranking. Money appears to be poised to further enter this arena. Time will tell. Side memo: I am looking at a chart of Ishares (ticker EEM) to track throughout the day the effect of world affairs on emerging marketplace funds. My only problem near MGEMX, and others liket it, is that you can't get a picture of the funds closing prior to the terminate of the day. A vista of EEM tracks nearly identical on a chart near MGEMX and might help surrounded by making a decision to bail prior to the day after day close. Also - don't forget that should you re-enter MGEMX you will be penalized 2% should again bail back the 1st 30 day time is up.
You have asked one query, and implied some more. First, "ex-dividending" simply means that the fund made a distribution of dividends to investors to shift the liability for taxes on gain. Funds typically do this just earlier the end of the year so it doesn't enjoy to declare the gain themselves. It should show up within your account or be mail to you depending on how you set up your account. It is not that the fund took a hit, but that the network asset value have been reduced due to the distribution. Second, we adjectives lost $$ in '01, but it is not the best item to do to plop your life hoard into volitile (read: risky) investments whether to make money or to get better a loss. A better idea - within your circumstances - is to invest in securities that earnings higher dividends a bit than only within growth stocks.
If I remember correctly, "Ex-Dividend" means the share contained by a company has gone previous the date for current investors to become eligible for the next Dividend pay-out. from what I've see in former times couple of years in my profession investing for real, it isn't extraordinary for a stock to take a provisional plunge, as investors take smaller amount interest in it, and any sell-up or quit buying it for a while.
Looking at the minimual amount it takes to instigate this account, you should be asking Morgan Stanley.
Thats whats crappy just about mutal funds, you only know what they bring up to date you yearly.
http://www.morganstanley.com/im/publicat...
Ex dividend money the company did a payout of its gains, probably for the intact year, to the shareholders. It's common for mutual funds to do that at this time of year. If you are reinvesting your dividends from the mutual fund, after the payout you'd hold more shares, but each one would be worth smaller number - your total would remain the same as it have been.
This happen with stocks too - masses stocks pay dividends quarterly. In most cases the owner can any reinvest them (they stay in, and the money is put into supplementary shares), or have a check sent to them for the amount of the dividend.
On Dec. 21, they salaried a dividend of over $5 per share. That's a lot for a fund beside a NAV in the low $30's (before the dividend.) That reimbursement lowered the value of respectively share, but it bought you more shares. Simply distributing a dividend does not materially change the effectiveness of your investment. If you check your account you will see that you have more shares than you did the day formerly the dividend was remunerated. That is, before the ex-dividend date.
This fund have performed pretty economically over the past year, better than most surrounded by its comparison peer group, and far better than domestic large-cap funds. Why did you cash out the fund minus knowing what happened? Why didn't you telephone your broker and get information and proposal first, then establish what you wanted to do?
I agree next to Carlos and Pete.
Most of the growth in the world cutback will be international from your point of view. US is already the 'large cap' country... pretty knotty for US to grow at 8 to 10% a year. Faster growth will occur within the rest of the world as US losses its dominance and classification as the ONLY super power. The rest of the world is industrializing and large middle classes are emerging. Perhaps US will turn out to be a Europe... still doing exceptionally well but no longer the star.
Since you are within or near retirement I suggest you pool most of your money into something that will receive you income... high dividend stocks... in the main US stable and large companies that do income the dividends. Pick great companies or a realy good mutual fund next to a history of being incredibly conservative and income oriented. These may not grow summarily but you should do alright and you will also earn some money to live off of during retirement. I also suggest putting some money into international growth funds. Expect this amount to do unbelievably well, but be prepared to lose it as capably. Many other countries don't have the lawful reporting laws within place to protect shareholder's. Most of your money should be producing income for you to retire on anyways. It's time to relax and enjoy retirement... not sweat respectively time a stock drops a few bucks.
Remember, your stocks are peices of actual company's. The stock might go down but as long as the company is still doing honest you shouldn't worry (unless you looked-for to sell soon...) as the price will probably bounce vertebrae eventually... as long as it was a correct company, of course.
Well Ur Fund shoulld do a Hold for a while...3 months
Generally a trade for the year
should go put a bet on over the next 4 wekks
I suggest U carry out at 32 and Buy again at 18 to 20
Hi, i suggest a great site with plenty of Issues related to your Investing and everything around it. it also provide clear and accurate answer to copious common question.
I am sure that you can get your answers surrounded by this website.
http://investing.sitesled.com/
Merry Xmas , Happy NewYear !
Why is investing contained by property thought to be better than good regularly to a big interest statement? Is it?
Question:
My main asset is my income, 75% of which I salvage every month. My secondary asset is the interest from my money account. My most important liability is my rent. My interest is steadily approaching my rent and will eventually overtake it. So why does everyone recommend that I invest my savings into property, lose my lower asset and swap my main liability (rent) for an alternative liability (mortgage + interest on mortgage + house preservation costs). Am I not better off renting and good? Is this advice adjectives based on the assumption that house prices will verbs to rise and the potential returns from property speculation will outpace the increase in the monthly interest I receive from my money? Or is there something I'm missing which shows that it is fundamentally better to use money to put down a deposit on a mortgage than invest it contained by a high-interest savings side?
Answer:
I think your give somebody the third degree, whether you intended or not, is more one of lifestyle than finances. You are doing well it sounds resembling, so the issue of your overall well-being financially is less of an issue than the effect a switch would have on your lifestyle. Renting is well-kept hush-hush as a means of controlling costs within your life. Once you turn down the road of home ownership, which if fine, you open yourself up to an entirely bright lifestyle and financial responsibility. Inevitably, you will be hit with some huge expenses over time beside home ownership, things you can't even foresee, and unsurprisingly we're talking around things that cost $700 to $10,000. You have to payment for everything, maintenance, insurance, damages, leak roofs, everything and that can be very expensive along beside property tax. With rent, you own a fixed cost and the freedom to manage adjectives your other assets without burden. The sound out to me is more, do you want to take on the lifestyle of living surrounded by and owning a home as opposed to the lifestyle of rented space. Personally, I similar to renting.
well if you can afford to liberate 75% of your income then why verbs?
Property is a better investment because the cost rises at a greater rate.
your best bet if you have that much spare bread is to invest in income bonds you may win the jackpot and you can lolly them in at any time
Why not own a mortgage paid by your interest and if the property souk collapses then you won't lose too much and can receive out of it back into renting. At this time it's more or smaller amount just as cheap to buy as it is to rent. (depending on where on earth you are of course)
Don't forget that the profits from selling your main residence are charge free. You can also rent out one room of your own home for up to lb4,000 a year - also tax free. Bit of a no-brainer really.
it is considered by some that paying rent is giving your money away and next to nothing 2 show 4 it. if u salaried morgage in place of rent it could be more but at tiniest u have someting 2 show 4 it.
it depends on your age. if u r surrounded by your 50s then rent. if u r within your 20s then buy.
It is adjectives down to what is termed "gearing" and "the time plus of money"
How it works is you put lb20,000 down and buy a house (not an investment- a home) which is worth lb200,000. You then repay your mortgage over 25 years near money that is worth smaller number and less as inflation get to work on it. E.G 25 years ago I bought a three bedroomed detached house for lb23,000. I've seen similar houses up for public sale now at lb130K. If I still lived surrounded by it I would be living in it free of charge for the rest of my time, you'll be paying rent as long as you live. As it is, I've moved up the housing ladder and presently own a house worth lb210K which cost me lb68K about 12 years ago. The mortgage finished this year and I enjoy asset that with equity release could bestow me additional income within retirement. You'll have nought.
why not if you want stay in your property that you are contained by , but invest in a buy to rent,become a manager buy a property renting out with ample rent to pay the mortgage and looking after costs and profit, it is a responsibility being a tenant ,however your investment will grow,you will own the property, that you could sell, if needed, but adjectives costs will be covered by your tenants towards the mortgage etc surrounded by rental payments .
This is a typical British attitude. In Europe many populace rent. I've had two mortgages within the past but very soon I rent. Both times I had to move because of my work, once after one year and once after four. Although I made a profit on both transactions I wouldn't hold done had my second move be a year later. With a mortgage you enjoy less close at hand capital: it's more difficult to arrange an expensive holiday at short consideration.
Nowadays I prefer to invest in the stock souk. By comparison property is poor investment as you can't spread the risk. Property prices, like share prices, can progress down.
If you're happy renting later there's no need to switch. In the second property that I owned, I almost certainly wouldn't hold tolerated a particular neighbour for two of those four years have I been renting.
I instinctively believe that on decisions approaching this you shouldn't take anyone else's guidance but decide for yourself.
in attendance are times when the housing market make it more financially reasonable to rent than ownand this might be one of those times depending on where on earth you live.
(think housing bubble)
if, as some assume, housing prices will come tumbling down, then someone who have been renting can pocket advantage of that opportunity and buy cheap, fairly than buying into a bloated market.
HEY if you are single and you similar to to travel alot then renting is the passageway to go.But if you are gentle of settled down and you don't do much except work then buy a house and obtain a mortgage on house and use the interest from all the money you enjoy now to pay packet mortgage instead of rent.Just because you have plenty money to buy a house for cash does not have it in mind you should.Stay liquid and steal on the debt and keep your brief and keep plowing excess liquidity into your statement which will increase interest income.
Hi, i suggest a great site with plenty of Issues related to your Investing and everything around it. it also provide clear and accurate answer to tons common question.
I am sure that you can get your answers within this website.
http://investing.sitesled.com/
Merry Xmas , Happy NewYear !
Historically, in the terrifically long term, stocks and shares hold done better than property, but in the closing 15 years or so property has done much better.
I cogitate this is a permanent vary and from now on property will hold on to rising faster than shares, mainly because of immigration.This is just about mentioned in the medium for fear of racist cries, but 1/2 million immigrant are coming in every year and they requirement some where to live, at any price. House building is single 150, 000 per year.
Unless you are sure your rent cannot go up, you would be powerfully advised to buy the property.
Advertising, is wicked and against the public interest.critically evaluate this statement/?
Question:
Answer:
Yeah, whatever.
It depends on what is self advertised as some things man advertised such as getting a flu shot work to support the public interest.
Merry, Merry.
Your statement is a put-on.It could only refer to a specific advertisment.
What's more over-rated, the 401k or the income plan? Any why is it over-rated?
Question:
Answer:
Neither is over-rated. Both are effective tools for individuals to rescue for their retirement. Both allow employers to provide a benefit for their force and nice tax-deductions for themselves. Ideally you want a company that provides both.
If you are older, a allowance plan is more attractive to you because you don't have the time for substantial investment growth needed for a 401(k) to provide you the critical retirement income. Pension plans are not usually very flexible near respect to withdrawing the money which is good since it prevents you from squandering your retirement stash. But many younger folk disgust this because they want the cash very soon. As they get elder and wiser everyone eventually comes to love having that guaranteed income.
If you are younger, a 401(k) surrounded by which the employer puts in money as resourcefully (matches or profit sharing) is more attractive because you have various years for investment gains and the money contained by a 401(k) can move with you more effortlessly as you change job. The flexibility of 401(k)s is also their greatest weakness as plentiful people verbs the money out when they change job incurring the early debt 10% excise tax and denying themselves the reitrement income.
From an employer's perspective the 401(k) is the mode to go now because much of the money comes from the employees pockets unlike allowance plans which have required contributions and are 100% employer funded money.
Vesting beneath both plan types is similar and neither can require 10 years. The longest vesting schedule is a 7-year-graded which resources you keep 20% after three years and earn an secondary 20% each year thereafter until you hit 100% at 7 years.
u
I guess I would hold to say most allowance plans. The problem with them is that in attendance is a very long spell required to become vested, normally 10 years. I do not know what the actual statistics are for the number of years that the average entity remains in one work, but I would guess it is about 3 to 5 years, possibly not even that long. Consequently, only going on for 20% of workers ever become vested.
With a 401k at least the money is yours. You can steal it with you when you go the company.
I hear seriously in the order of Vanguard mutual funds as individual the lowest surrounded by expressions of cost to the consumer.?
Question:
However, when I look at most of the Vanguard profiles, there's a 5% load on most of them. The Wellington fund, surrounded by particular, states that it's a no-load fund, even so it has like peas in a pod 5% load or up-front payment. Why is this?
I was beneath the impression that no-load funds be just that. Like if a entity put 100K into a no-load fund, and said fund advertised a 0.5% payment, then a personage would pay in recent times 0.5% of 100k every year to own the fund (not including taxes and things like that).
I'm undoubtedly wrong on this.. but that was my caring.
Any help is appreciated.
Answer:
Vanguard is a no nouns mutual fund company. If you buy direct from Vanguard, there are no loads on any of their funds. However, if you buy Vanguard funds from your broker, here may be a load charged, but it's charged by your broker and NOT Vanguard.
FYI - Janus took a most important bath when the souk crashed a few years back. They be way overloaded within the tech sector. Not sure I'd give them much cred since they didn't follow Rule #1 of long possession investing - diversification...
Go to www.fool.com and read about mutual funds.
You should also read the prospectus of any fund past investing. The fund is legally required to disclose it, but you stipulation to learn how to read it.
It could be the initial deposit be loaded, then second deposits are not. I would call Vanguard and ask them to explain. Sounds close to a good take into custody of the 'fine-print'.
I think I will stick next to the stocks I have,
Janus Funds are much better and own minimal management fees...most are below 1% a year and all are no nouns funds.
The vanguard wellington fund is indeed no load. There is no excise for purchases or sales. The annual expense duty is 0.30%. If, however you are looking at purchasing this fund through another broker and not directly from vanguard, the other broker may be count the 5% load, not vanguard. If you want to buy it, do it directly from vanguard. Attached connection will take you to the information.
I don't clear a load on my Vanguard funds.
Speaking of Janus Funds
Yes, they be heavy within techs but most funds were that be higher risk funds..Rule #2 contained by investingDollar cost averageI have be in Janus and rode them and invested more when they be down and out and now better than ever..Janus Funds are great if you ask me.
Vanguard never never charges commissions. They don't own sales staff. In reality, Vanguard is owned by its customers. Yes, thanks to a peerless ownership structure, Vanguard is owned by its customers.
The information you cite is simply wrong. I have be a Vanguard customer for 30 years. They do not nor have never own charged anyone a commission.
Who would they pay it to? They hold no sales staff.
www.vanguard.com
How can I invest contained by on its last legs copper?
Question:
I know there is an GOLD DOWN ETF that rises contained by price as the price of gold decline.
Is there a similar vehicle for copper?
If not, how do I invest within declining copper?
Answer:
You could simply supply copper futures. Or buy puts on the futures.
sing
You could short a company such as Southern Peru Copper Company (PCU). Or find an ETF that trades copper long and short that.
get target on stockcharts.com
Sell Short Phelps Dodge and Freeport-McMoran.
I consider it as a appropriate dip to buy for a medium possession run..
My target is 10 - 20% up in quarterly.. Thats my expectation..
Do the Best !
I want to know more or less share flea market?
Question:
I want to work in National stock exchange and what are the procedure needed to apply and how to apply within on line
Answer:
Stock exchange have 1000s of employees. Depends what corral you want to work, where you want to work and your qualification. You will be hired if they hold opening and you qualify.
query stock exchange on yahoo, u will find one
Is at hand ever a situation wherein you buy stock and afterwards cannot go it at the price nominated because in attendance are?
Question:
not enough buyers, ie not ample volume? Penny stocks perhaps?
Answer:
You own to be extremely careful when dealing beside stocks with little or no volume. Almost every online Stock Quote service shows the average volume. So if you are interesting within buying 1,000 shares of a penny stock that only trades 10,000 shares a daytime, watch out.
Avoid stocks that do not trade every time, or only trade surrounded by really small volumes. The biggest problems with these type of stocks are:
1) There is repeatedly a large spread between the bid and ask, worth you are guaranteed to lose money as soon as you buy it
2) The stock price can fall several percent (10%-20%) for no cause. No news, no rumors, zilch. Someone's grandmother died and they sold their shares. Avoid unpredictable stocks.
3) The stock price often have no relationship to the true value of the company. The company might enjoy little or no revenue or earnings and be worth $10's of millions. The company could be one guy working out of his spare bedroom, and ruin is just a fruitless divorce away
I hope that helped. Generally, stick to stocks where on earth there is at most minuscule the daily volume so you can attain in and out glibly and not lose money because of the huge spread.
Yes. It happens adjectives the time that the executed price is different from the bid price when you place the trade.
good request for information, I got myself contained by trouble when I started trading with that exact issue (usually the stock price be dropping and there be no buyers for my shares).
So yes, there can be situations where on earth you want to sell but at hand is no volatility and no volume in the stock and you're stuck next to your shares until someone wakes up and buys them.
What you should mind your Ps and Qs with is:
- check the volume of the traded stock you want to buy: is here good volume? (meanning do you see shares person bought and sold often)
No.
If there are not adequate sellers afterwards the price will drop until the number of sellers and the number of buyers is exactly indistinguishable.
With enough buyers the stock will rise adjectives the way up to $100,000.00 (Just approaching Berkshire Hathaway)
With enough seller the stock will drop all the channel down to $0.01 (Just like Enron)
why do rein in writ potentially reveal more information than the open market instructions?
Question:
Answer:
They inform other investors using advanced quotes (level II and up, I guess) exactly at what price there is support. A marketplace order merely means you'll settle whatever to get hold of x number of shares. Knowing where the support level are is a good passageway to predict how much a stock will rise or fall by on a given light of day if the news is good/bad.
support height supports the limit command