How can i invest and promote environmentally friendly companies - not in recent times own shares contained by them?
Question:
I would rather not only just own shares in a company or mutual fund because these option don't appear to actually promote environmentally friendly companies. Is at hand some way to invest within venture wherewithal firms that in turn invest contained by environmentally friendly companies?
Answer:
You could buy used cars (8 cylinders) and resell them in Mexico and Canada.
I disagree beside you. I think when you buy shares within a pro-environment company you are supporting that company. Whenever I see someone asking for stock advice, I utter buy Energy Conversion Devices, ENER, or buy Vestas Wind, VWSYF.pk. I own small startups like Tower Tech, TWRT.ob, that make wind tower support structures.
Stay away from companies that are discouraging for the environment, like coal, and big grease, and utilities like TXU.
Here is a knit on wind vim companies:
http://www.top10traders.com/viewpost.asp...
This link is from http://www.top10traders.com - this is a free site that let you create a portfolio of stocks with $100,000 surrounded by "play" money. Each day the site ranks the best performing portfolios, so you can see how your picks act compared to other investors.
Good luck!
I don't understand. You influence you want to invest in scheme capital firms that "invest surrounded by environmentally friendly companies", but you don't want to "just own shares within a company or mutual fund" because they don't "actually promote environmentally friendly companies."
So, buying stock within an environmentally friendly company isn't enough, you stipulation to invest in a scheme capital company that invests surrounded by environmentally friendly companies. So, if it is an old company it doesn't count, but if you are helping form a fresh company, then that matter?
I think you are too picky. Buy into a company because it is obedient and green, then write to the company government that you are buying into them because they are good and green. That ought to cover the basis as far as I can see. Sorry.
Investing in 'green' companys or funds, does abet these companies. It help to increase their stock price, so that other those will be interested in them as resourcefully.
To promote them even more, find out which companies the fund is investend in, and use their products.
As for a project cap firm, unless you've get several hundred thousand to invest, they won't let you play.
what more or less buying within on down open market days?
Question:
what about buying mutual fund shares past 4 PM each time the DOW is down at least 15 points? Buying contained by consistently at the lowest possible points in a predictably long-term rising open market seems a fitting idea.
Answer:
Most of the time you can individual buy mutual funds at the end of the sunshine.
If they are exchange traded, then you enjoy a chance, but it is impossible to time the marketplace. Don't try it, it doesn't work
Well, first you have to consider the facts.
That might be a biddable approach sometimes if the rising market trend continues. However, here are often fees for precipitate redemptions in overnight case you decide to lift your profits or cut your losses.
http://wwwtaxman.blogspot
Ah, the dream of all investors!! Buy low and get rid of high!! You could engender millions!
The sooner you can get your money invested, the better stale you'll be. If you've got change, don't wait around for the souk to fall.
Let's read out on Monday the Dow is at 12,000 (you're waiting for a decline of 15 pts)
Tuesday it increases by 100 pts to 12,100.
Wednesday it increases again to 12,300.
Thursday it falls by 20 points and you invest when at Dow 12,280 (this is higher than what you could own investe at on Monday).
Since the market moves up roughly speaking 65% of the time, you're better off getting your money invested sooner and not waiting around for the Dow to decline.
Do you suggest trading against trend?
Bill Williams clearly described it in his book Trading Chaos II
Won't work. You can't attain your 'cash' to the broker in time to trademark today's trade. Even if you have a money bazaar with equal company, they won't redeem the MM until after the close, and won't make the purchase until after the close on the subsequent business day.
In a long permanent status rising market, that would seem to be to make sense. Unfortunately, the market's means to stay down usually can and will outlast your ability to verbs to contribute to the market respectively and every day the flea market is down at least 15 points.
Further, because you have a word about mutual funds, you're really tying your hand as they are not very solution and are loaded with fees (even the no nouns ones) if you try to sell "too soon"
If you're set on this strategy, you do inevitability to do (at least) two things. One, use an ETF (Exchange traded fund) like QQQQ, DIA, or SPX instead of a mutual fund. Two, you should use what's call a triple screen method.
The triple peak will help you from freshly jumping surrounded by arbitrarily on down days. It'll keep you right more times than not. The triple eyeshade (see Alexander Elder's Trading for a Living) essentially has you following a WEEKLY uptrend, and have you buy after daily downtrend (hence your down days), but you buy when the price is above the previous day's illustrious.
So, if you're buying DIA, and it was 122, after 121, then 120.50, next 120, you wouldn't buy each time it goes down. You'd dally until the down days are done and the price goes above the glorious of the prior day. This still get you in on a "down/dip", but you won't ride the dip down as sometimes the indexes, etc, can verbs down for several days.
Does that make sense?
No business what, please backtest any strategy you plan to use. Your best chance for nouns in within preparation and knowing that you have a honest system with a positive expectancy.
Best of luck!
Trying to time the marketplace is very risky. Here are a few excellent suggestions for investing:
http://financialbasics.blogspot.com/2006...
Good luck!
Has anyone hear abt Land International marketing landscape surrounded by Swindon?
Question:
www.landintfe.com
There are critics who say that it is not a virtuous investment as it is too far (140km) from London and the transport costs (e.g. USD $200 by train from Swindon to London) is too high.
Is anyone buying the opinion in UK?
Answer:
Here is the pattern page : http://www.landint.com/
As for if it is worth it, the only path to be sure is go nearby ancd check it out. If it is good park, (not swampy or other defects), and the price is right, then it is a right investment. Distance is only to a degree relevant, as the more populated an area become, the more the land will be worth.
How much is a silver cterificate one dollar bill worth?
Question:
Answer:
If it looks old, and have a lot of folds contained by it, it probably is only worth $2 or $3. Look at ebay and force out for ones with similar date and see
It's to late to redeem,as silver.You should own done this approx. twenty years ago when they were retract by the Govt.
I would guess they are worth more than a dollar. People collect anything!!
It depends on the year and condition of this certificate.
They might fetch up to $4 or so.
It depends on the condition of the bill. You will stipulation to go to a collector and own it appraised. You can also buy a book on coin collecting that will give you an approximate utility. Don't trust the first offer you return with, and don't fool yourself into thinking that your bill is in better condition than it really is.
wHAT ARE SOME OF THE REASONS THAT A COMPANY WOULD SIGNIFICANTLY REDUCE ITS DIVIDEND?
Question:
Answer:
The direct reason is a trim down in network profit. Another reason is to reserve currency for new nouns in close at hand future. But companies next to steady growth may also pay out low dividends, for more details please read this, it dialogue about the duty aspect as well:
http://www.dows.com/publications/investi...
"...a stock near a lower current dividend yield usually have this lower yield for the two contrasting reasons: (1) The investment opportunity for the company seem so promising that the board of directors determines it within the best interest of the shareholders to plow back the greater member of earnings into the expansion of the company's business; hence, the dividend payout is small as a percentage of total proceeds. (2) The price of the stock is relatively higher, reflecting the investment community's assessment that the prospects for the company are indeed promising and/or the factor of risk is small."
"...At the federal level, dividends are presently tax as regular income with rates that be in motion as high as 39.6%. In contrast, income gains on stocks held more than one year (long-term) are tax at a maximum rate of 20%. Furthermore, while dividends are taxed surrounded by the year earned, possessions gains are not tax until a security is sold which may effectively defer taxation masses years beyond the year in which such gain is truly earned."
Usually contained by slow growth sector, companies would prefer to pay dividend to boast up their stock prices. In a faster growing industry, companies prefer to profess their cashflow stability than paying out (usually because its a start up and need currency or they are saving up for investments)
Also, some excise law prevent the beneficiaries from fully relish the dividend as most of it will go to paying toll, so shareholder vote not to issue dividend.
A very polite example for you would be Kodak. In 2004, they wanted to exhaust dividends so that they can conserve cash for investments into fresh technologies similar to digital cameras. But long term shareholders revolted as they want the company to verbs as it is and continue to issue soaring dividend. In sunset industry, often, the gross revenue are lower BUT usually near high fringe as competition starts to exit.
The first two reasons: (1) they didn't form enough to repay a dividend, and (2) they want to use the money for some expansion or action to sustain or advance profitability. Not always is this because the company is "on the ropes" financially. Sometimes, when a single loved ones owns a substantial share and they don't really need the income, the would-be dividend funds are better than borrowing to build that strange thing they own in the works.
The flea market tends to punish companies who use up their dividends. -- causing an unexpected loss of over 6% (on average). Therefore, companies do everything possible to avoid lowering their dividends. Many firms will go so far as to run on debt to avoid lowering dividends.
Needing cash for operation is rarely a cause to cut dividends for healthy companies. They will own access to other funds, and will not need to cut them.
If a company significantly reduce its dividends, it is a sign tht the company is in serious trouble.
The most important reason is poor profit. The company simply did not put together enough money to rate out the same dividends they did concluding year. However, there are a couple of others, and these are usually right news.
The company want to expand, purchase a competor, launch different products, or increase R & D to fasttrack a new product.
All of these are awfully expensive, and the company may have settled that it would be better to fund these activites internally, rather than whip on more debt.
You will need to review the company's stability sheet, and read it's annual report to detemine the exact reason.
what is a stable worth fund?
Question:
Answer:
This is a pretty good website that should thoroughly answer your quiz. http://www.smartmoney.com/university/inv...
value funds sure are more stable than most, but everything is relative in the stock flea market.
There are quite a few plus index funds you can choose from. Here are 4.
IWN 16% annual return over 5 years small cap expediency
IWD 10.7% annual return over 5 years large sunhat value
IWW 10.9% annual return over 5 years total bazaar value
IVE 8.8% annual return over 5 year S&P 500 advantage.
There are quite a few others but that should donate you an idea.
If the dollar looses its place as the world's reserve currancy is it still a appropriate notion to invest within a 401K?
Question:
My employer has only just announced they will match 1/2 of employees' 401K investment. But in a minute it seems oil-producing countries as a complete have started reducing their dollar reserves, most prominently Iran. If this trend continues along with the corresponding dollar devaluation is it still a apt idea to invest contained by this plan considering it will be over a decade before I can repeal any money without a cost? Does anyone have a better suggestion for investment?
Answer:
Yes. Especially if your employer is go well together 1/2, that's a guaranteed 50% return on your investment. The value of the dollar as it relates to different currencies does not really event for a 401k to be beneficial.
You seem to be looking at a doomsday scenario where on earth the dollar becomes virtually worthless. If that happen the entire US economy would container, and we would take several other countries down next to us, and we would all be living within a 'Mad Max' type world.
Having said that, you need to check the details. Most employer only meeting up to a certain percentage or dollar expediency. My current company matches 25% on up to 4%.
Meaning if I contribute up to 4% of my retribution, they will match that DOLLAR total next to an additional 25%. Say my 4% amounts to $2,000, 25% of that would be $500, so my company would distribute me an additional 500 dollars. I can contribute more than 4, but they will lone match on the first 4.
Also, you obligation to find out your investment options surrounded by the 401K, Vanguard, and Fidelity are 2 of the larger 401k managers, but in attendance are thousands of them, and every 401k will offer different investment option.
If your worried about the currency market effecting your return, you may only want to invest surrounded by domestic companies, bonds, or just a money flea market. Either way, you should not turn down the free money you company is offering.
Real money have been gold ingots and silver for the last 5,000 years. As the US dollar decline in advantage, people, investors and nation flee to the strongest currencies such as the Swiss Franc and Euro.
Central banks and those also began to buy gold ingots and silver as a hedge against the decline of the dollar. Gold and silver rise dramatically within price as the demand increased and everyone trade dollars.
Smart money have already made the move into gold ingots and silver. Billionaires have already begin to protect their assets from the coming dollar devaluation by buying gold and silver.
It is the average American explicitly totally ignorant of what is going on with the American dollar. It have already declined over 30% as compared to the Euro contained by the last four years.
Americans, regardless of your occupation, if they want to preserve their fortune and protect their family from the ravishes of poverty, they must obtain a knowledge of gold ingots silver investments, while these metals are relatively cheap.
In the end we adjectives have to bring in this decision for ourselves.
401K plans should be the core part of your retirement planning. You get hold of tax breaks as in good health as the matching contribution.
I assume you live contained by the US. Whether or not OPEC prices oil contained by dollars or Euros makes little difference as a practical thing since you will have to hold and use dollars to live in this country.
The US reduction is the biggest and - at least right very soon - the most robust economy within the world. I think that will remain true for the rest of our lifetime.
Invest in diversified mutual funds and if you enjoy the option, put 10% or so surrounded by a gold fund. The long residence growth rate of the US stock market have been around 10% a year compounded and gold ingots usually holds it value as the dollar depreciates.
Worry roughly your own future not the long occupancy depreciation of the dollar. Don't forget they have inflation contained by Europe as well, and the Euro will depreciate - perchance even faster than the dollar.
I don't think that you hold to worry at lowest in essential future, as the grease producer N1 - Saudi Arabia is still using the dollar thing and mortal a rival of Iran it will do the opposite. The item is that the dollar will devalue for sure starting abt 6.5% next year according to WF, Its a problem for both me and you. And what make it worse that Russia stopped using dollar as a reserve which cuts us for abt 2-3 bln dollars a year. so what i suggest is using a currency mix for time being especially EURO as its going strong, or view for two years to be sure to see results as its still blurry now.
Is this post a recent query or was it made posterior in 1979?
Looking wager on to 1979 and answering this question, I guess it is safe to articulate that things will work out and the US economy will verbs to grow, even though there's some terrible political risk within the Middle East. I hope our hostages get released indisputable soon and maybe grease prices will drop a bit too.
Answering it today, I'd probably have to travel with alike answer as above (less the comments about the hostages).
Remember put a bet on contained by hasty 2000's when your stock portfolio took a dump, how hold you recovered from that?
Question:
and what lessons did you cram?
Answer:
Yes I have recovered. When everyone be saying "This time its different, profits don't matter," I didn't believe it. I continued to hold long occupancy solid companies as my "core" holdings. I did "invest" a small amount in 2 "gamble." The 2 were electric utilities that changed their fundamental businesses. One get mostly into energy trading (became a toddler Enron) and I sold at a small loss, the other changed to a long distance phone company (Montana Power to TouchAmerica). That went totally "belly up" on me. Lessons -- If the company change its business from the original justification you bought, watch it closely. If it no longer "fits" into your portfolio, SELL fast.
My stock portfolio was simply fine, even in 2000. But I wasn't investing within all the dot.com companies any. Most of those aren't even in business any more.
The lesson is buy appropriate stocks and hold them long term. Reinvest dividends.
Go read up on Warren Buffett. He's the second richest man within the world and one hell of a stock market investor.
nought new to revise. Markets incl stocks, real estate, tulips, etc are base on emotion within the short term. They step higher than they should when rising & lower when they should when falling as a mind set of momentum kick in. I did not own internet stocks so in recent times got caught beside the whipping winds of the balloon bursting. Has happened past & now up in existing estate. Invest in a diversified portfolio & DO NOT SPECULATE.
2000 be not the time to be heavily invested in stocks. Granted my assets did not increase as much as they did during 98-99, but they did not nick a hit either. Just a breather so to speak. There is a time to invest aggresively and a time not to. 99-2000 be a time to shorten sails and prepare for the squall. Many who met the storm underneath a full set of sails wound up capsize and some actually drown as a result.. Those who be traveling under shortened sail at the time weathered the storm just fine.
The Best Investments are contained by Third world countries...due to high profits and cheap occupation why is it everyone invests in cheap low profit stocks :|
I believe surrounded by giving as good as you acquire so I took a dump in the hindmost seat of my stockbroker's VW Jetta.
He stopped investing my money so heavily contained by companies that made spandex pants for boy band and my portfolio recovered quickly.
That financial recession really didn't hurt me that discouraging. Thank God, I put all my money into precious stone encrusted thongs from Tiffany's.
well, I get a job and made a bit of money. consequently spent it.
"money is for spending; if you have it, spend it! I don't want to hear any more roughly economy!" - Pat Garrett (wealthy miner during Klondike Gold Rush)
;-)
Is it compulsory to enjoy an underwriter for an IPO?
Question:
Companies which have the predisposition to have oversubscription..its an second expense (underwriter commission)then why they will have an underwriter?
Answer:
In an IPO, shares grasp listed on an exchange. Only a licensed broker can knob transactions conducted through the exchange. Basically, this means that you are surrounded by fact required to enjoy an underwriter for an IPO. But even if you weren't, you'd still want one. Someone other than the company have to give a valuation belief. Someone has to in actual fact sell the damn weekly, preferably at a good price, which take more than a song...
This said, some companies (especially smaller ones) find the costs of IPO (not just underwriters, but lawyer, accountants, and printers as well) prohibitively expensive and turn to private placements instead.
Is nearby any one month investments that collection from close to $500-$1000?
Question:
Answer:
What are you asking? Do you have 500-1000 to invest, or are you asking if there's anything you can create that much with?
If you're looking for a short residence place to put 500-1000 for a month, I would suggest an online savings side like www.ingdirect.com Orange Savings description or www.emigrantdirect.com American Dream savings. Both income just over a 5% APR--more than you'll carry at any brick and mortar bank and they're FDIC insured so you don't hold to worry going on for them going bankrupt or anything.
If you're trying to net 500-1000 it depends on how much you have to invest and what it's for, but it would embezzle a lot of money to win a guaranteed return of that amount.
I own some Silver dollars next to no date or mintmarks and an eagle holding 3 arrows and have 7 tailfeathers, ??
Question:
any idea what date or anything roughly speaking these coins??
Answer:
Sounds like you enjoy some extremely worn Morgan silver dollars, dated 1878-1904 and 1921. You can see how a Morgan dollar looks like beside all the details:
Obverse: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/image:morga...
Reverse: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/image:morga...
In mint condition, a Morgan dollar weigh 26.73g, contains 0.7736 ounces of pure silver in it, and near the silver fineness of coin 0.900. To discover more about Morgan Dollars, read this article: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/morgan_doll...
If you're wondering how much are your silver dollars worth, I'd speak it's worth only the price of silver contained by it(bullion value), because the coins are too worn to have any numismatic advantage. But if you sell them, you'll take less than the silver bullion price.
supply on ebay & get details
what does turnover of a company miserable?
Question:
Answer:
It means the turnover of the inventory, usually.
If you own $100,000 of goods surrounded by inventory and your sales are $500,000 per year near a cost of goods sold of $300,000, you hold a 3x turn. This means your $100,000 turns over three times per year.
It could also plan the turnover of your employees.
buy it deal in it off hasty
the percentage rate at which employees call a halt employment (voluntarily or involuntarily) divided by the employees are hired inwardly a period of time
Hebb is correct. In accounting "Turnover" refers to the rate of silver of inventory
Reading "Dow Theory" and swing trading DIA near its thinking?
Question:
Any thoughts or just stick to the charts when trading DIA.
Answer:
You know, I own heard of scientific analysis for 30 years, I have looked at charts, It hold heard forecasts base on charts...Do I beleive?? I beleive that charts show what happened surrounded by the past, I am not convinced on their predictive exactitude
when does a share split? enjoy any shares split just this minute?
Question:
do you think G00GLE might split their shares?
Answer:
Some of the strategies of stock spilt is to increase liquidty of the share. ie, so it is cheaper to buy. Also, When a share price get too high, influence $400, it is more difficult to rise to $440 (10%) than $220 (10% but after spilt).
G00GLE is an unconventional company. I doubt they will spilt at adjectives as they do not have any liquidity problem. In reality I suspect they may even go for reverse stock spilt as they do not requirement the major up and down swing of share price to distract them.
A share splits when the company decide that its share price is too high and it would be more attractive at a lower price.
Some shares similar to Berkshire Hathaway never split. Splitting does encourage more speculative buyers. I conjecture G00GLE wants investors who are making a bet on the long permanent status future of the company, so it is unlikely that they will split.
Share price is also becoming smaller amount important as it is unproblematic to buy stocks in smaller amounts than the standard 100 share lot.
A stock split is also sometimes see as a precursor of a good adjectives...the thought being that they wouldn't own split the stock if they expected it to go down. Another, more sinister (albeit rare)reason is that some executives try to prop up a share price by splitting the stock. I also disagree that better prices discourage speculators. I think Berkshire's turnover is due to the personality of its shareholders more than its share price. Go to one of their meetings, and you'll acquire it.
BH is one of a kind. My guess is that you'll see G00GLE split at some point.
Shares are split for two reason one is to create liquidity and the other is to comply with the financial redistribution prerogative. Lower the price highly developed the market participant. Higher the market participant better the redistribution of privileged circumstances.
Should I only deposit my reserves bonds?
Question:
I have reserves bonds that are about 20 years outmoded, a $100 and a $50. They aren't worth much more than that now, but I'm really broke and could use the money. Should I linger longer so they'll become worth more, or are they not going to reach any great amount anytime soon?
Answer:
Cash them surrounded by and use the money. Savings bonds really only aid the government (by giving them money to use), not the bond holder (as you hold seen by their incredibly small appreciation). If you entail the $$$, just shift to the bank and change them in. Don't touch guilty.
You could probably make more money rotten of them in a glorious interest savings side.
They are not going to reach any great amount any time soon. Use the money instead of borrowing or charging.
If they are 20 years old-fashioned, then they be purchased when interest rates were a bit high. They may let go 12%, no problem. My ING direct account yield less than 5%. If you can't put food on your table, or drive your vehicle to work, cash them surrounded by; but you'll make more money stale of them than you will alternatives. If you can get a credit card near a low interest rate, and can responsibly use it and pay it past its sell-by date, it may be a better alternative.
depends on the interest rates. Some older bonds reimburse better. Maybe you can sell it to somebody who desires to keep them for the high yield for a complex price than the bank. Find out the concede and contact me if you are interested in selling them to me
Cash them contained by. They never did generate a decent return and they will not surrounded by the future. Unfortunately, you are going to own to pay taxes on the interest they earn but only federal taxes. About 15%. Keep that within mind.