what are some of the obedient strategies contained by trading option and stocks?
Question:Answers:
Buy low, hold onto the shares for ages (like up to 20-30yrs) while they gain in merit..... remember, the more often you buy & go..... the more commission fees you have to repay..... which eat into any profit you earn - just repeat your 5 + 10 times table, and you'll see how much they'll add up the more you buy & provide.
Re-invest any & all Dividends earn in more stock so you're entitled to more dividend subsequent time round.
But also regularly check how the company is performing since you initially invested, and know when the company is beyond all hope and it's time to bail-out
Other Answers:
you know I enjoy tried paid services, read books and am convinced in attendance are very extraordinarily few people that can bring in money consistently trading options and stocks.
i do not believe in that is strategy that works, frankly.
Call Hillary Clinton.
There are definitely stratagies that work bc at hand are many associates with lots of money because of them. There are tons of different stratagies to do. You can revise more on this site. http://adamsoptions.blogspot.com/
Sure there is...
First, resolve how you want to play the markets. Are you a buy and hold guy, hoping to buy long-term stocks rash and hold them until maturity? Or are you a short-term trader who looks for plus in beaten-down stocks and buys low and sell high? Or are you a daylight trader who will play momentum and watch the ticker to get rid of at the peak?
These are adjectives very different strategies. It is up to you to prefer how much stomach you have for risk and how much time you want to spend on your portfolio of a mind to your garden.
There is no right or wrong answer. The problem most people own is that they do not know their own temperament and strategy. Once you understand your temperament and strategic approach, the rest is graceful...look it up on Yahoo!
Buy and hold
short-term investing
day trading...
There are literally millions of articles that will assistance you decide correct strategies. First, you have to find your heart contained by all of it.
Best of luck to you!
Best strategy, buy low, vend high!
Lots of info here.
Source(s):
http://www.stock-trading.jims-info.com/
What's yesterday (19/07/2006) 4D Results?
Question:ASAP! Thanks~Answers:
1st Prize 8932
2nd Prize 7125
3rd Prize 2878
Starter Prizes
0210
0464
2849
4300
4379
4759
6392
7015
9462
9982
Consolation Prizes
0718
0898
1139
3390
4518
5829
7289
8019
9220
9826
Hope you have struck a prize.
Is it unanimously polite word for a stock to split? Where can one find a document of stocks that enjoy announced...?
Question:an upcoming split?Answers:
Splits make stocks more affordable to small investors but largely don't mean anything. It's approaching breaking a pencil into 2, you now hold 2 pencils but you didn't add any helpfulness. You can find out which companies are going to split at Yahoo Finance at http://biz.yahoo.com/c/06/s5.html
Other Answers:
Stock splitting is good. That money the company is making money. I don't think it is announced beforehand because that would basis a selling and buying frenzy.
It's generally devout news to announce an impending split, but not so suitable when it happens. The stock usually go up after the announcement but down after the event.... no.
Splitting stock is irrelevant to the value of a holding surrounded by the company.
It reduces the appeal of shares in (approximately) alike proportion that the stock is split. That is, double the number of shares, approximately halves the share price.
Because of the psychology of most investors, they feel more comfortable purchasing 100 shares for $10 respectively than 10 shares for $100 each surrounded by the same company. So, splitting shares might result within them being traded more, consequently might result in them going up contained by price more. Key word is MIGHT. I'll second/third the "it means nothing" gang. Splits do not affect open market cap. Any effect resulting from bringing a stock into/out of the trading continuum of investors who happen to similar to specific stock price ranges is purely temporary.
Looking for company announcements is a dutiful start though. It means you are trying to know more in the region of your investment. The press releases to look for though are companies announcing stock buybacks. This not only channel they have the money and appeal their own company, but it also means they are doing the best piece for the current investors. Isn't it great to own a stock that effectively has a controlled downside? A stock split is a non-event. It's just a psychological spectator sport that corporations play with unschooled investors.
Which is a better deal? A dozen eggs for $1 or a partly dozen eggs for 50 cents?
what do you assume in the order of Walt Disney stock...is it a honourable investment?
Question:i need your lend a hand please, Thankyou...Answers:
Disney is way over-priced at this height. If you are in in a minute, sell it and keep on until it comes back to a more sustainable level- speak, $23.50 or so. That will be the first step down. The support level after specifically below twenty, which is where it will bring to a close up trading in almost eight months. DIS has reach its peak. Lock within your profits now.
Better however, roll those profits into some out-of-the-money Jan 07 25 Puts (.DISME) on the stock, currently trading for about $0.45 (forty-five cents...). Quadruple your money within about four months.
Other Answers:
yes,disney products are everywhere. and will be forever
it is for me I bought som at $14 per share it is in a minute $29+. not bad
I own $43 million from a settlement, I am thinking around investing 10 million, what are some flawless stocks?
Question:Answers:
Good, all I entail from you is a nice dinner in New York City if I double or triple your investment surrounded by 12 months.
1.) 10% on EZM --> Red Dirt Cheap copper and zinc play
2.) 10% on NAK --> #2 Gold and copper deposit in the world, this stock may be taken over or have 100+% appreciation in 12 months.
3.) 30% on TRP --> contained by case 1.) or 2.) does not vessel out(5% of chance), collect nice dividend in Canadian Dollars
4.) 5% on Canadian Maple 9999 Silver Coin via Nucleo Exchange for $14/oz or less--->www.bulliondirect.com, hold contained by the "trading" account.
5.) 5% on Canadian Maple 9999 Gold Coin via Nucleo Exchange for $680/oz or less--->www.bulliondirect.com, hold contained by the "trading" account.
6.) 5% trading on many options(You may need to appendage it over to option trading specialists, the fees are sophisticated but the reward is greater too)
7.) 35% in currency or CD
Good luck
Other Answers:
put some into the Human Fund
please transport me some for crists sakes i would b glad to invest for you Ya really got 43 million surrounded by a settlement eh??? Worth 2 points any way but angelic information for you to use as an investment.
Invest in both commercial and single ancestral homes
If I was gonna invest into something that would grant you an excellent return it would be 2nd trust deeds, tax liens and looking at my bank Real Estate On Hand list (REO).
Your first name goes on adjectives the deeds securing the property in your christen as well as you term is on the title.
I hope this has be of some use to you, good luck.
"FIGHT ON"
if you enjoy that money ,don't do any thing.
of late relax and spend.....you can't get rid of it
so why do you want more?
I would start a trust fund. Something that would benefit the comunity or society as a whole. It would also grant you a tax break on the million that you are keeping. Also if it turns out to be a moral trust fund it would generate its own income and would outlast you but you will always will be remembered.
If you want it to work for you. Look for an industry that you like(is sucessfull and not likly to fold or rip you off) and become a leading stockholder. That way your millions are working for you and you own a say contained by what the company does.
Go into business for yourself. You have a nice cushion and will not own to be strap for where is the money is comming from.
Once you are into the millions It is not what you can do near the money It is what can the money do for you.
The only track for you to lose out is if you think that a million will buy you anything. It will if you brand name it work for you.
There are many horror stories of populace that made millions but went cleaned out because they listen to the wrong people or mismanage their money.
It is nice helping ones clan but they will be the ones that could lead you to financial ruin if you consent to them.
Source(s):
My opinion
No you don't.
But I'll make available you the best advice you'll ever attain anyway. And when it's time to actually DO the investing, phone call me.
Now, the answer to this usually depends on what you will need the money for, and when you'll entail it. In a case close to the one you're presenting, you'll never "need" any of it, although I have to ask contained by your fictional universe, why you would solely invest $10 million of the $43 million. What's the rest of the $33 million for, wallpapering your garage? Burning it in lieu of heat oil? No, you'd invest adjectives of it. The Harvard and Yale endowments are respectively over $15 billion with a b. They don't invest a quarter of it, they invest adjectives of it. So smarten up.
Now, of course you're going to want equities-based investments for a life-size portion of your portfolio. Long term, they've average an 11% return, compared to 6.8% for genuine estate, 5% for bonds, and 2.5% for cash investments. Of course, stocks are abundantly more volatile than most other kinds of investments, excepting commodities, unsurprisingly.
Indiviudal stocks are usually way too risky to even bother near, to be even more forthcoming. In 2000, you could have invested surrounded by the #1 energy company within the U.S., or the #2 phone company. What could have be more stable than a couple of leading utilities? Ask the shareholders of Enron and Worldcom, respectively. No, a far smarter, and safer, passageway to get that needed equity exposure is through excellent mutual funds. I'm not talking the junky tech-bombs that exploded on the scene the unsettled 90's. I'm talking just about quality funds that own aspect stocks, and have a level track record to rear legs it up.
No matter what route you walk with, the most esteemed thing is to DIVERSIFY. Diversify, diversify, diversify. I can't say-so it enough. A appropriate rule of thumb for most people is that your age should be the percentage you are contained by fixed income investments, like bonds, CDs, and brass. Thus, the older you win, the more conservative you'll become. Of course, your individual risk tolerance will vary.
Assuming you are 30, a token portfolio like the following will be adequate:
10% Large-cap stocks
10% Mid-cap stocks
10% Small-cap stocks
10% International developmed markets stocks
10% Emerging market stocks
10% Real Estate Investments
5% Commodities
5% Precious Metals
10% Government bonds
10% Corporate Bonds (including High-yield)
5% International Bonds
5% Emerging Markets Bonds
As daunting as that may or may not look, it can be achieved markedly easily through lately a few mutual funds. The key as expected, is which funds, and that's where a honourable advisor with well-mannered research earns his money. Properly manage money will always beat ANY index, and I have tons of background to back that up for any cheapskates who focus an S&P 500 index fund is the way to budge. Ask anyone who has any REAL amount of money and they will chuckle at that idea. And they'll guffaw even harder at the idiots that suggest it. The aforementioned Harvard and Yale endowments? The ones contained by excess of $15 billion? They average about 15% return a year. No index funds in that.
That said, a properly diversifed and asset-allocated portfolio like the one I suggested above should average 8-12% annually, or better. They push button is that all the different asset classes behave differently when matching economic event happen, like, vote, interest rates rising, or a war starting within Bulgaria. Stocks behave differently than bonds, which behave differently than commodities, which behave differently than real estate, etc.
Using the "Rule of 72", where on earth you divide the number 72 by your return % to see how often your money will double, we see that if this portfolio is earn 10%, it will double every 7 years. Compare that to a money market earn 2%, which will double every 36 years!
So, in 7 years you should enjoy about $86 million.
within 14 years you should have roughly $172 million.
in 21 years you should own about $344 million.
contained by 28 years you should have just about $688 million.
in 35 years you should own about $1.3 billion.
contained by 42 years you should have around $2.6 billion.
in 49 years you should own about $5.2 billion.
surrounded by 56 years you should have just about $10.4 billion.
and on and on and on.....
Hope that's enough for you.
Thus we illustrate the power of compounding, which Albert Einstein call mankind's greatest invention. It also illustrates the power of starting rash!
As a completist, I'll just mention that if the portfolio earn 12% it would double every 6 years or so, so that it would actually conquer that 1 billion number in just 30 years instead of 35, and the 10 billion number in just 48 years instead of 56.
Now quit jerking everyone around and bring back to some genuine questions.
Hope this help!
--J I suggest you to invest the entire $43 Million in the Stock Market near the help of a Private Banker.
Asuming a minimum of 10% you will carry $4,300,000.00 in a year and you could spend $2,150,000.00 and reinvest the rest.
That process you will never will run out of money. In fact, every year you would own more and more.
Keep in mind a 10% return on your investment is drastically low. With $43 Million you can easily hire the best surrounded by the World and get superior returns.
Top 3 Answerer in the Business & Finance. (Vote for me) If you hold that much then why is your tresses du messed up totally. Your personal stylist would have fixed it or something. Tottaly
How does the Dow work?
Question:I saw today that the "average" was up 100+ points. Do they literally lately take adjectives the + and - points and average them out? Sorry if this seems approaching a silly question, but I've only just started looking into the market and it newly seems so simple for something I've always thought be so complicated LOL!Answers:
Each company is not equal in expressions of a stock going up or down say $1.
Let's use small numbers to engineer it easy. Say GE (General Electric -a monster-sized co.) have 1000 shares that are "out" there owned by anyone. And Bank of America have 500 shares "outstanding" and owned by anyone.
If they were both to budge up $1 then 'essentially' GE is worth $1000 more and BofA is worth $500 more.
That's why "bell-weather" stocks create a greater impact on the Dow Jones because there are surrounded by some cases billions of shares "outstanding" in those companies which manner that a $1 move in the stock cause billions of dollars to be lost or gained.
Each company have a "weighted" value contained by proportion to its size and then specifically multiplied by the price movement which is then added up to present you the Dow Jones Index.
Other Answers:
I'm sorry but markets ARE complicated. Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) is not calculated by taking + and - (not sure what that money actually). Rather, it is calculated by using traded prices of 30 blue-chip U.S. stocks. The stocks prices are weighted, meaning that larger, more influential companies pass more weight contained by the calculation. In appendix, the stock prices are also adjusted for splits.
You can find a history losing DJIA index here:
http://va.essortment.com/whatisthedo_rteo.htm
The original Dow Jones average be literally that -- an average of several stocks. The current average uses 30 stocks. If they were to start the index in a minute, you could get the average by basically adding the prices together and dividing by 30.
However, you later have to contemplate about what happen when there is a dividend salaried or a stock split. Someone replicating the index would take the extra money & spread it out so indistinguishable number of shares of each stock is owned. For this common sense, whenever there is a stock split or dividend clearing, Dow Jones changes the divisor.
This lead to some problems Stocks with difficult prices have a bigger effect on the index than stocks next to small prices. The S&P 500 uses a different rule -- they weight the prices by the number of shares outstanding -- so larger companies enjoy more of an effect.
Source(s):
I'm using me as a source. I have a PhD contained by Finance -- but also used to work for Dow Jones collecting stock information. The system I developed was in reality used to calculate the DJ averages. The DOW points are are a weighted average of 30 Blue Chip stocks.
Is the Stock Market well-run?
Question:According to the "efficient market" proposal, all available information in the order of a stock is already reflected contained by its price, therefore it is impossible to predict its adjectives movements, since no one can predict the adjectives. This is sometimes called the "variable walk" theory, since stocks seem to be to move in completely subjective ways. For example, a company reports record returns, yet its stock price falls (this is not unusual). A chimp throwing dart at the newspaper stock page can pick unbeaten stocks at least as powerfully as, if not better, than a stock professional. (I have an idea that this experiment has truly been tried.) The few professionals such as Peter Lynch or Warren Buffett are simply lucky. In decoration, they established their reputations in historic years when stock information was not so widely disseminated. Now, near the internet, all available information is truly available to adjectives, so the markets are completely reorganized. Do you believe this theory? Why?Answers:
I am not a complete believer surrounded by efficient souk theory, so I can't be a angelic defender of it. However, I will utter research has shown the marketplace is partially well-run. Evidence shows that the vast majority of mutual fund mangers can not hit the market. See the first association below for a discussion. (I don't agree with everything contained by this link, however.)
I find John Ross's claims of "hogwash" smaller amount than convincing. His facts are wrong. American mutual funds do not routinely outperform the market. See the second join. American Funds Washington Mutual A has underperformed the souk 4 out of 7 years. It did well, but it did not routinely outperform.
Harvard does not routinely hold an average yearly return greater after 15% every year. See the third link. In 2003, they reported they did 10.1% over 5 years and 14.7% over 10 years. However they did do okay.
There have be monkey throwing darts contests. The most top ones were within the Wall Street Journal. However, they didn't actual train a monkey to throw darts, they have a staff member play the monkey. The professionals won, the monkeys lost.
Other Answers:
which stock marketplace? U.S.? British? Klingon?
It's hogwash. All of it. There was no chimp experiment. Many firms model stock portfiolios routinely outperform the marketplace. I'd suggest you take a look at firms resembling Edward Jones' 7- and 10-year track records. Even more stunning are the performance archives of firms like the American Funds, who again routinely outperform the market by doing extensive research in ways the average investor could never hope or even envisage to. And lastly, check out the performance documents of the endowment managers at Harvard and Yale for example. They respectively manage over $15 billion and routinely put up an average annual return surrounded by excess of 15%. No chimp, or index fund, will ever do that.
Hope this helps!
--J.
I could explain you surrounded by great detail why the Stock Market is not efficent or I could email 10 stock picks that are going down in a roll followed by 10 stock picks that are going up within a roll which of course would prove the stock flea market does not move at random.
I asume you are identifiable with probabilities and you realize it is impossible to guess the direction of 20 stocks contained by a roll.
Top 3 Answerer in Business & Finance. (Vote for me)
It is definitely not efficient. If it be, nobody would make any money. You are correct within stating that information is widely available. But it's not the availability of information that matters, it's how you use that information, or contained by the case of lots people, whether you even use that information. There are too copious people out at hand that don't have any clue what they are doing, and that creates awfully lucrative inefficiencies.
when a company go public, what determines the price of their stock?
Question:Answers:
A lot of time and thought goes into the determination of the price within an IPO. It is determined by the issuing corporation with the suggestion of the underwriter. Some aspects they will look at are the: P/E ratio, market condition contained by similar securities (and interest in your company), spread the underwrite syndicate is willing to adopt, capital the company wishes to bring to the fore, debt ratio, etc.
The list can dance on for a long while, but that should cover most of the essentials. Needless to say, profoundly of effort and calculation go into it.
Other Answers:
How popular their products are, how much they flog.
The overall value of the company divided by how frequent shares the company is selling for the IPO.
First, the underwriter prepares a valuation opinion. Then, the underwriter's salespeople get hold of on the phone and start collecting commitments. If the total of commitments exceeds the amount of shares to be sold in the IPO, the price is revised upwards. If the total of commitments is below the amount of shares to be sold within the IPO, the price is revised downward.
The stock price of a company is calculated when a company goes public, an event call an initial public offering (IPO). This is when a company will pay an investment wall a lot of money to use totally complex formulas and valuation techniques to derive a company's utility by determining how many shares will be offered to the public and at what price.
Wrong, wrong and wrong.
The investment bankers set an expected span for the IPO, but the price of the stock is always determined by the constraint for it. As more investors want shares, the prices naturally rises. As price rises, a lesser amount of investors want shares.
That's why sometimes an IPO will be oversubscribed and sometimes the company will withdraw it.
Any worthy Small-Caps?
Question:Any good potentials out at hand? How about penny-stock publications?Answers:
I've used the "Cheap Investor" past its sell-by date and on for over ten years. His record is well-mannered. Like all "Penny Stocks" you can lose significant dollars.
Rule #1 - #97;
Never bring stock tips (especially on Penny Stocks). Most "tips" turn out very bleak, very fast. Do your own research (thorough).
Rule #98;
Have an "asset allocation" that you're at ease beside. Limit your total portfolio allocation to "Penny Stocks" to between 1% - 3% of your total invested funds.
Good luck!
Other Answers:
Penny stocks are poison.
No.
What is the best opening to start investing surrounded by stocks in need thousands to invest?
Question:Should I use a broker or try to do it on my own? Any info would be helpful.Answers:
To make available you specific advice on what to invest contained by based upon the 2 sentences that you provided would be irresponsible so I will speak contained by general. First of adjectives, if you have any soaring interest unsecured debt like credit cards I would recommend paying that bad. That can save you 15 - 20% here in interest. (A penny save is a penny earned). If your unsecured debt is taken care of my subsequent recommendation would be to create an emergency fund equal to 4 months of your fixed expenses. (mortgage, rent, vehicle payment, food expense, etc) This emergency fund should be put contained by something that has no risk to it such as a nest egg account, money bazaar account or extremely short residence CD's. Check www.bankrate.com for the best available rates. If you have access to a credit association you may find good rates in attendance as well. If debt and your emergency fund are taken carefulness of I would then recommend that you are maxing out your company retirement plan if to be precise available to you. If that is not an risk, a Roth Ira would be a great option as capably. I would recommend index mutual funds as the investment within the Roth IRA. If you own accomplished adjectives the things that I've outlined and you still have money moved out, I would recommend splitting up the funds in a powerfully diversified portfolio of mutual funds with index funds as the groundwork of the portfolio.
I realize my recommendations are not as sexy as vent an internet business or investing in gold ingots but they are based on my 15 years experience as a financial advisor. Good luck to you. I hope this be helpful.
Other Answers:
Do it on your own.
Some companies agree to you buy as little as 1 share with no commission.
I'd recommend Sharebuilder - there's no minimum investment. If you achieve a company with DRIP (direct reinvestment plans) you can reinvest through the company short going through a broker again, saving abundantly on fees. If you're not experienced, I'd go next to larger, stable companies at first. Use the DRIP account and invest a fixed amount regularly. Also, reinvest your dividends...you'll build success slowly but surely. A few tips:
Invest in "penny stocks", stocks that trade at smaller quantity than $3, rather than the more pricey stocks, at lowest possible at the beginning of your trading job.
Do a search for an investment company that will consent to you have a free practice portrayal so you can try investing without the risk for a while to achieve the hang of it.
A broker isn't a doomed to failure idea, but avoid those online companies that promise to tutor you how to "make thousands or even millions" as a sunshine trader. They are making thousands or even millions by charging people a small fortune for information on how to read charts.
There are various websites that give FREE introductory information on investing. Have a look, but don't discharge to join mail lists or other political leanings services--there's no need to reimburse for information that is available for free. Start near http://beginnersinvest.about.com/. The multi-part Investing Lessons on that page are especially helpful: http://beginnersinvest.around.com/cs/investinglessons/a/aaless1intro.htm, as is the series called Learning to Invest.
Have a look at books on the subject. The "Dummes" series have a couple of good books on investing within stocks. There are also books on investing in penny stocks, online trading, and related topics.
Best wishes! I would suggest starting next to a mutual fund, which doesn't require tons of money. Most are somewhere between $500 and $1500.
Since mutual funds invest in assorted stocks, you'll have the benefit of buying into a picnic basket of stocks managed by a professional portfolio checker.
The hardest part will be picking a fund. You can check out Morningstar Reports, which rates the different funds out there. It's available online or at your local library.
It describes the fund's purpose, give performance history, and rates it so you enjoy an idea if they approaching the fund or not. Some funds invest in US stocks, others foreign, some contained by small companies, others large, so you've get a wide inspection from which to choose. Have a look through the articles & How-to guides here:
http://www.fool.com/investing.htm
Among the things it will tell you are:
- "Tending to your finances isn't as mysterious and complex as you've be led to believe. The professional Wise men on Wall Street, however, would similar to you to keep thinking it's too difficult for you to do yourself. That channel you'll entrust your hard-earned dollars to them, so that they can generate fat commissions for themselves.
Sure, in that are some good brokers out at hand worth the money they charge. But know that most financial advisors aren't paid by how economically they manage your investments, but by how normally they get you to trade within and out of stocks. Their main duty isn't money management. It's sale. And what do you get surrounded by return? Sub-par performance and lower returns."
http://www.fool.com/school/13steps/13steps.htm
- Conventional prudence #3: Trust the Wall Street brokerage firms. They're here to help you navigate the labyrinthine world of investing.
Foolish response: Well, they spend hundreds of millions a year on TV commercials insisting that they can back us, but... ummm... don't count on it. First off, it's not surrounded by Wall Street's best interests to teach you. As long as you're contained by the dark roughly investing, you'll have to furnish your money over to Wall Street to manage it for you. That channel, Wall Street professionals can charge you (often via hidden fees) to have power over your money. The entire industry is built on your not figuring out how to direct your money. And, happily, that's exactly what your fellow Fools are here to give support to you do.
http://www.fool.com/school/13steps/13steps01.htm
- Over time, because of their costs, approximately 80% of mutual funds will underperform the stock market's returns.
http://www.fool.com/school/basics/basics04.htm
I'd suggest using http://www.SHAREBUILDER.com and try to do things on your own...... but learn adjectives you can about investing first from Fool.com (which I've already shown you) and also from http://www.investopedia.com possibly also find a Fantasy StockMarket game to practise beside first before using your own, unadulterated money.
I hold a request for information more or less tracking stocks. Please read more.?
Question:I have adjectives several different stocks, all Dow Jones.Is here an online place I can put the stock symbols along with the amounts I own that will track each day and maybe even graph for me how they're performing over time?
Answers:
yahoo/finance.com
My husband give me information. He said your are lucky. Someone smiled on you.
Other Answers:
Are your stocks presently with a stock brokerage firm approaching Smith Barney, Edward Jones, etc.; If so, you can set up on line Internet access that will allow you to check on your portrayal anytime you want and allow you to customize certain things, close to gain/loss, specific stock charts, research,etc.; you can have dividends reinvested to buy more stock or set up, articulate, a money market acct. for graceful cash access; If not, near are software programs where you'll own to input the info and create "graphs" but it's tedious and a excess of time; check on fees that various companies charge to buy, trade, manage, etc. your rationalization to get the best operation...
I found some good info here.
Source(s):
http://www.stock-trading.jims-info.com/
What does the topline and bottomline indicate?
Question:While looking at the corporate results, I often come across statements resembling "Our Topline grew by so many % and the Bottomline showed this growth".What does Topline and Bottomline tight? I am talking in the region of the perfromance of the company, its financial data..
Answers:
topline refers to sale.
Bottomline refers to the profits (which is what gives shareholders money ;))
Should i buy Yahoo stock at its 2 year low- 25.20?
Question:i need your counsel pleaseAnswers:
Do not buy in subsequent few days -- it will still go down
Wait for a reflection
Other Answers:
that was a heck of a drop wasnt it? I devise it will rise again but not sure when.
i like yahoo today, but who will it be subsequent. i would buy into g......le The stock market is too unsettled to invest very soon. I am putting my money in CD's and the money marketplace until we see which direction the market will walk with the mideast conflict and large gas prices.
You seem young at heart enough to survive any volatility contained by the market, so what do you hold to lose, we all know it's a strong company beside a solid and unlimited future.
Yahoo is a strong company (good fundamentals), so I would recommend you to buy it for a long occupancy investment. Its 1 year target is 41.36Source(s):
http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=YHOO
I cannot find the worth of "Investment Guru Effect" as resourcefully as Guru's characterization!Pls. relief me.Thks within mortgage!
Question:Answers:
A Guru is an all knowing expert on a finicky subject. The "investment Guru Effect" is when a well certain investment advisor or "Share market Guru", "Real Estate Guru" etc, predicts the attraction of a particular item will rise. This make everyone keen to buy it and so drives the price up.
Other Answers:
An investor who is see to be extremely knowledgeable around the markets, and to own much experience at making successful investments. These investors are widely known to the investing public and generate double-digit returns.
This is not a possession that is applied to only just anyone - an investing sage must become worthy of such accolades. The most notable investing sage is Warren Buffett, who is sometimes referred to as the "Oracle of Omaha". His highly successful investment strategy have made his shareholders incredibly wealthy. A $10,000 investment contained by Berkshire Hathaway (Buffett's company) in 1965 would be worth nearly $30 million within 2005
Has Yahoo changed it's "Stock Alerts"?
Question:Answers:
Last week a received an alert that one of my stocks droped 25% (I sold the stock over a month ago thank God) and I do not recall setting the alert.
To find out more around Yahoo alerts go here:
http://alerts.yahoo.com/