Whats your view on apple stock?!?!?!?!?
Question:
I see that the apple (aapl) stock has risen greatly. In the ending year, do you think it is going to stir higher or even split soon. Is this stock worth buying nonetheless??
Answers:
its pretty high right presently... right now would b a correct time to sell
I would hold bad, myself.
Historically, it spikes up after a release of a product, then baselines or go up or down slightly. Had you invested a ten thousand before they dropped the iPod, you'd be a millionaire, but observation is 20/20. :)
Wait until they announce a second-gen iPhone, THEN buy some stock.
I think I missed the boat on that one. :-( But as Cramer say, there's always another boat.
Hi,
I used "Rockwell Trading Strategies" to craft consistent profits.With these strategies, they really simplified my trading and I don't have to use anymore the complicated formulas and indicators.I come accross this company on NBC News Special Edition.
Now, they're offering 100% satisfaction guarantee.If you don't see a highest improvement by applying the strategies,they will not lone refund your investment, they will pay envelope you $1001… out of their own pocket.Check it out here:
http://tinyurl.com/3dea5d
AT&T lower than expected iphone mart .. will that seriously affect APPLE's financial background release tomorrow
Question:
and what's your thoughts on its stock price (AAPL)
Answers:
The sales of the iPhone weren't lower than expected. They be higher.
The activation of the phones through AT&T be lower than expected, thought that expectation wasn't realistic since it come out at the end of the quarter. Many general public bought the phone and waited a few days to prompt it. This may have be because of the highly publicized difficulties a few society were have in getting their phones activate that first couple of days.
The stock prices will dip and then bring back back to where on earth they should be later. No worries.
Considering that the IPhone be released, what, Jun 29, it only have 3 days to sell previously the end of the quarter, I right to be heard hardly any effect. 3 months of IPhone ad might have really be an expense though.
Books on indian stock open market BSE/NSE?
Question:
I have be reading "The intelligent investor" and thought of going with collateral analysis next. Since these books are base on US market, I be wondering if there is any book available for indian stock open market in the lines of the above 2 books and next to the equivalent(even bit less ok but the best for indian stock flea market would be a good one) trait? I understand that the concepts contained by the books mentioned above are applicable to adjectives the markets, i prefer a book on indian bazaar to learn in the order of this market.
Thanks
Answers:
visionbooks.com
ebooks & PPT on 4shared.com
be worldwide all r same,
better try commodity trading
more on my blog
In the currently bullish souk, all the available books appear to own been notably priced. Try to log n to sites like Daytrading.com.which cost nil.
We r probing for on-line trading(stocks on commodities)experts to work near us any body primed?
Question:
Answers:
You should manage a FOREX narrative by yourself with a lend a hand of a strategy. The returns on this program are staggering. You can expect double digit returns a month.
www.demofreedomrocks.com
General Stock Information?
Question:
Could you please give me some broad information and advise on stocks? And some unfinished vocabulary definations, such as "bulls" and "bears" and "short"...etc Thanks!
Answers:
Starting with the definition:
Bull - an optimistic attitude of the market. If a character is a bull he believes the market have more appreciation potential.
Bear - a pessimistic view of the bazaar. A person who is a undergo believes the market will be in motion down in the hard by future.
Short - to trade an asset before you buy it. Short selling a stock way you sell the stock today and hope to buy it contained by the future at a lower price. Someone who sell a stock short has a bearish judgment of that stock.
Long - owning a stock. If you own XYZ Company stock, you are long XYZ Company.
As far as advice on stocks, within are many different strategies to determine when a stock is honest to buy. Do a little research into them and use the one that make sense to you. Some people similar to to look at charts of stock prices to determine patterns, some close to to look at the balance sheet of companies looking for definite information that is not inherent simply by knowing the designation or looking at charts etc. There is no one course that is right or wrong.
I own heard that you can catch a practice account at some of the online brokers (e-Trade, etc). Try out some of your design there.
For common information, I think your best bet is to start beside...
http://www.investopedia.com/
If you're still interested in investing for your adjectives, then may I suggest reading...
One Up on Wall Street, by Peter Lynch
Buffett: The Making of an American Capitalist, by Roger Lowenstein
Value Investing With the Masters, by Kirk Kazanjian
The Davis Dynasty, by John Rothchild
Valuegrowth Investing, by Glen Arnold
More advanced...
The 5 Keys to Value Investing, by J. Dennis Jean-Jacques
Beating the Street, by Peter Lynch
Investment Fables, by Aswath Damodaran
The Vest Pocket Guide to Value Investing, by C. Thomas Howard
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits, by Philip Fisher
Made within America, by Sam Walton
Forbes' Greatest Investing Stories, by Richard Phalon
John Neff on Investing, by John Neff
The Intelligent Investor, by Benjamin Graham
The Money Masters, by John Train
EVen more advanced...
Stocks for the Long Run, by Jeremy Siegel
Quality of Earnings, by Thornton Oglove
Investing in Small-Cap Stocks, by Christopher Graja and Elizabeth Ungar
The Book of Investing Wisdom, by Peter Krass
You Can Be a Stock Market Genius, by Joel Greenblatt
Break Up!, by Campbell, Koch & Sadtler
Investment Gurus, by Peter Tanous
Value Investing: A Balanced Approach, by Martin Whitman
Value Investing: From Graham to Buffett and Beyond, by Bruce Greenwald
The Road to Serfdom, by F.A. Hayek
Buy "Wall Street" on DVD.
How do we make nouns and fashion a wearing clothes profit contained by the stock flea market?
Question:
Answers:
Hi,
I used "Rockwell Trading Strategies" to make consistent profits.With these strategies, they really simplified my trading and I don't hold to use anymore the complicated formulas and indicators.I came accross this company on NBC News Special Edition.
Now, they're offering 100% self-satisfaction guarantee.If you don't see a major alteration by applying the strategies,they will not only discount your investment, they will pay you $1001… out of their own pocket.Check it out here:
http://tinyurl.com/3dea5d
Luck is get to be with you. There is other a chance the bottom may spatter out of your valuable stock. You hold to judge perceptively when to hold, and when to sell.
by working at burger king. duh!
Invest within the stock market average, commonly call the Standard and Poor's 500 Index. It tracks 500 of the largest companies in the U.S.
Most mutual fund manager (75-80% of them) can't beat this index. This is a capably accepted assumption contained by most financial communities now.
Chances are, neither I nor you could lash the S&P either! So a not dangerous, wise, and ultimately profitable strategy is to invest surrounded by the S&P instead of individual stocks. By investing in this, you'll spank most of your friends and--shock!--most of Wall Street.
If anyone can answer this we'd all be millionaires. The flea market has no guarantee. You can invest surrounded by stock wisely and probably come out ahead over time.
To invest cleverly, diversify. No less than 10 stocks surrounded by various sector. For small investors, mutual funds work best.
Research via the brokers web site. Learn the meaning of Earnings per share, beta and IRR. The brokerage firms have adjectives the information anyone can want, but you need to take in what it means. Learn what ratio are and how they provide insights into a companies health.
Watch the stock closely once you establish. Sell when a stock goes below a predetermined point or when it reach a high you have a sneaking suspicion that it can't sustain. Don't try to time the market, hang on to it in for as long a time as possible.
Lastly, remember, you don't know anything about a stock that stock analyists know six months ago (unless your doing illegal insider trading). Don't deliberate so information you stumbled across will give you a hot stock.
Stevie is without blemish correct. Trying to beat the index is a mug's winter sport and only help to ensure a princely living for fund managers who play on people's ignorance or greed.
However I must agree that life is dull buying the index and I prefer to buy shares my self. Not because I expect to hit the index but because I enjoy the thrill.
The amount of money you filch out of the market is directly proportionate to them amount of time and crack you put into it.
There are several successful stock trading systems. Choose one and get correct at it.
Why do companies walk out of their route to get sure their stock price go up after IPO?
Question:
I mean it will be dutiful for their second public offering, more attractive stock options for the human resources, be able to get rid of more shares of non-outstanding ones, and what else am I missing? Thanks!
Answers:
I have to disagree beside the previous answers.
First of all, in that is a dance going on beside the underwriters and company in any IPO. The company desires to get a elevated return for it's stock. The underwriter wants to see its institutional investors engineer money on the deal as all right (for a variety of reasons). The pricing is regularly a balancing feat between the two.
Many times, the deal is so hot, that the company is more than unworried to see the stock open up 50% or more from the offering price. Such behaviour generates substantial publicity for the company, something that you only can't buy with marketing dollars.
It also feel good to the company organization and executives.
Meanwhile, the underwriters often exercise their "Green Shoe" making even more money and their favorite institutional investors will presently be on board to buy some of the smaller amount desirable IPOs. It's all part of a set of the game.
By the path, underwriters are allowed to "stabilize" a stock at it's IPO.
To summarize, the pricing of an IPO is a complex balancing perform that takes into story many different and regularly competing desires by the Underwriters, the Company and the Investors. It's an art, not a science.
companies cannot "make sure" that their stock price go up. Because the company is public, it is bought and sold on the open souk. There is no way to insure that it will rise. Usually IPOs rise on the first sunshine of trading because of all the hype.
On a side facts, of course the company wishes their stock price to go up...i.e. the board of directors' job. They serve the shareholders. However, zilch is certain. If you can catch into a random IPO, contained by fact you own a higher indiscriminate of losing money than gaining it. All those companies that go huge like G00GLE and Microsoft be exceptions to the rule that many companies that jump public Will Not Survive!
They usually don't. Generally companies wouldn't really care what happen with their stock once it go public and to be honest neither would the underwriter provided all the shares sold. That anyone said if the underwriter has some shares to deal in or wants to trade name it attractive for the current holders who didn't flip you'll see them adding surrounded by what is known as a "booster shot". I approaching to call it idiot guidance. This is when the underwriter decide to initate coverage on a stock at buy or strong buy which then bumps the price up so their big players can supply at a profit. Isn't it a huge suprise that the lead underwriter would want you to buy the stock... shocking.
For that strategy to be honest the underwriters would enjoy to be complete morons and bad at math. Underwriters get hold of paid a percentage of the IPO and companies get hold of cash from selling stock. Why would underwriters underprice an issue and not capture the company all the money possible and not carry the highest comission possible? It's in plain sight that they wouldn't. The IPO issue price is the maximum value that the stock should deal in for. Anything more is truly speculation on future income. Anything less is probably genuine value. Sure stocks move about up in some cases after an IPO but lots times they go down. It depends on what the currency is being used for. Generally when stock prices rise exceptionally elevated it's just speculation movement and I recommend that you keep stop advice fresh on something like that.
Advantages and disadvantages of Accounting information disclosured through the internet?
Question:
Answers:
you could G00GLE the accounting practices you describe
Mai provato su G00GLE? I criceti sono stupidi!
Do you know any body surrounded by hyd, who lost min INR 10 lacks within stock souk? if yes can you provide cell no.?
Question:
Do you know any body in hyd, who lost min. INR 10 lacks within stock market? if yes can you provide cell no.?
Answers:
Why you are asking? are you going to administer any compensation? already became a barber, do you suggest to again capture the tigar tail? never.
What do you infer of follwing stocks?
Question:
YHOO, PFCB, EBAY, IBKR, BAC
Answers:
Hi,
Bluechips in personality and they never let down their investors though in that might be temporary hiccups at times. You can take more info on this from http://stocks.advisorinternet.info... . Good luck!
Not much.
They are all have-beens - except for IBKR, but what they adjectives have surrounded by comon is YOU - in language of trying to bottom fish and catch the cessation of a downward trend to be ahead of everybody else, unless, of course, you are looking to short them :)
let see now.
1)YHOO - $25.24 eps= 0.51 roe= 8.27% buying price =$2.11
2)PFCB- $35.24 eps= 1.28 roe= 11.04% buying price= $7.07
3)EBAY=$33.32 eps=.99 roe=12.10% buying price=$5.99
4)BAC= $47.64 eps=4.69 roe=16.20% buying price=$37.99
eps= profits per share
roe= return on equity
buying price = EPS x ROE/2
this includes your margin of safekeeping
Hi,
I used "Rockwell Trading Strategies" to make consistent profits.With these strategies, they really simplified my trading and I don't hold to use anymore the complicated formulas and indicators.I came accross this company on NBC News Special Edition.
Now, they're offering 100% delight guarantee.If you don't see a major amendment by applying the strategies,they will not only reimbursement your investment, they will pay you $1001… out of their own pocket.Check it out here:
http://tinyurl.com/3dea5d
I own simple interest amts at 5% monthly. Need to know the difference contained by amts if the int be charged at 3%?
Question:
Example: 5% int charged per mo was $5.00 - requirement a calc to find int charged amount for 3% without using the artistic base amount - individual the interest figures and percentage. Thanks for any help.
Answers:
= (3% / 5%)*interest amount; otherwise stated
= 60% of interest amount
You would entail to know the base amount. For this example you would numeral the base amount that the interest is charged on and next use this formula.
convert percentage to decimal 5% is .05
Then divide by 365.25 (number of days in a year)
.05 divided by 365.25=.0001 (interest factor)
Then whip interest charged ($5) divide by 30 (avg days in month) divided by interest factor .0001
$5 / 30 / .001=1666.67 (Balance or "unproved base amount")
Now digit out the interest factor at %3 then reverse the steps
.03 divided by 365 = .00008
after
Balance X days in month X interest factor
1666.67 X 30 X .00008 = 4.11
That's how you would do it manually but in attendance are a lot of simple interest calculators online that you could use to stockpile time.
What is considered an legitimate rate of return on investments?
Question:
I receive the interest on a trust fund. The principle is almost $400,000. What percentage should I expect?
Answers:
That depends entirely on the allocation of assets.
The dividend yield on adjectives stocks in the U.S. is underneath 2%.
A 10-year Treasury Note yields underneath 5%.
The manager take a fee, which usually comes out of income.
Talk to the trustee and ask how the fund is invested.
Well at the lowest, you should be getting 5% or 20000 per year interest (before taxes). Investing long term within solid mutual funds should get you over 10% annually previously taxes (no guarantees in stock, bonds, mutual funds - you could lose entire principle)
Over the long occupancy, expect 8 to 10%. That's an average taken over at least 10 years. If the trust is human being actively managed, you should capture at least that.
If the trust is passively manage, or held in low risk securities, you may single get 4 or 5%. When you allow for inflation, that funds that you are getting less than 3%.
Very personal ask. One man's trash is another man's treasure. What you consider reasonable might not be what I consider average. Personally I never do anything that yields smaller amount than 25%. That is what I consider "reasonable". My last investment earn almost 40%. Most "experts" will say within is too much risk involved in an investment that earn this much. It is called "risk-return" tradeoff. A boring and useless concept from Finance essay books that argue there is a relationship between what you earn and the smooth of risk involved. Ridiculous!
A lot will depend on how much control you have over the investments that your trust make. If the Trustee is lazy (or lacks investment knowledge) it is probably surrounded by some sort of financial asset like a money open market or mutual fund. This is easy and relatively risk-free and has a completely lame yield.
It is unlikely that you can control the investments, but you might be capable of consult with the trustee give or take a few the kind of investment you want, what kind of returns you want to carry out and the overall plan for growing the trust. For more insights, write to me ken@thesynergycorp.com
Good Luck!!
There's two components to "total return" in language of investments -- income generated from interest and dividends and assets appreciation from the gain or loss in principal from investments. If you delivery only the income from your trust fund, noticeably that's going to SEEM to be more important to you right in a minute. However, growth in the principal of your investments, as you would expect, helps out too (as I'll mention within a sec)
Let's assume the trustee is investing your money 50% in fixed income investments and 50% within stocks ( a good moderate asset allocation). With $400,000, that would miserable about $200,000 surrounded by "income generating" investments (primarily) and $200,000 in "growth generating" investments (generally). Based on current interest rates, an average abandon in lingo of income would be about (a) 5.5% on the income side and (b) 1.5% on the growth side. So...
$200,000 @ 5.5% = $11,000
plus
$200,000 @ 1.5% = $ 3,000
equals $14,000 contained by estimated income in a year (less trustee's fees and taxes of course)
In lingo of growth of principal, the "growth" side will gain about 10% within an average year if it's properly diversified and invested along market norm. Some years, of course, it could be contained by negative domain; some years it will do better than 10% -- but that's an average. So if half of your portfolio is invested surrounded by "growth" investments that would mean 5% growth within the total. Your "income generating" investments, though, will likely DECREASE surrounded by principal value because as interest rates rise (as they have) the principal plus of the bonds goes down. If you're "breaking even" on the principal side, you're doing accurate, but most likely, you're probably losing more or less 1% or 2%. Take the middle of that, and that means your total "growth" within this kind of portfolio would roughly 3.5%, meaning the $400,000 would grow within an average year to about $414,000.
Bottom smudge, "total return" for a 50/50 asset allocation portfolio on an average would be about 7-8% annualized over time.
Is in attendance a "real" system for picking in the lead stocks?
Question:
Answers:
Well, if there be, don't you think everyone would be doing it?
Stocks can clearly vary surrounded by the amount of risk they carry beside them, but the market itself is thoroughly hard to predict on a time to day argument.
Yes, I have it too!
Buy a stock when it is low. Sell the stock when it is giant. Bingo! It works every time!
There is one other "Real" System, just keep under surveillance what stocks I buy, then provide them right away before they crash!
You bet in attendance is.look no further that Warren Buffet who has made billions next to his "system". I suggest you buy the book Rule Number One by Phil Town. This is easy reading and swarming with really obedient basic insights.
But....Why do you want to be within the stock market? Unless you own a large pocketbook, you can return with better returns elsewhere.
Hi,
It's the most difficult job on dust. While gambling, you will own to go by your instincts and your luck will give somebody a lift care of the rest. You can find some useful tips on stocks investments from http://stocks.advisorinternet.info... . Check it out. Good luck!
There's no "real" system for being 100% right surrounded by picking winning stocks, no concern how much you hear about different methods.
There are ways to pick, overall, stocks that overpower the market over the long run. However, these systems require seriously of work (due diligence), patience, and verdict. In other words, the systems rely on you to work hard, dream up smart, and always be on the lookout. Most society don't want to do that and instead try to find cheats or another easy style out.
If there be a way to effortlessly pick stocks that go up, any everyone does it and then it no longer works. Or someone really smart is making a ton of money and not recitation anyone.
Not sure what you mean by "real".
First, here are many well-mannered systems that work but none is fool proof and works all the time.
Second, systems are implement by people who are influenced by alarm and greed. When losses reach an insufferable level, the system go out the window and the personage sells within a panic. When the bazaar turns around, they get pissed and chase the highflyers.
There is no "real" system. I expect the best way is to pick the right stock guru and follow his direction closely. You can try the following:
http://doublingstocks.com/go/171723...
there are so lots system to pick a winning stocks. here are some of them,
1-look for stocks that consistently enjoy above average earnings per share growth and return on equity. this two indicators adequate to prove that the stocks have growth potential as very well as good shareholders' money admin.
2-look for cashflow growth year after year. as to warren buffet, real currency is everything in businesses.
3-if you serious just about income generation stocks, you enjoy to consider dividend yield, dividend growth, return on equity and institutional ownership.
Step by Step Stock Picking Techniques
http://www.stock-investment-made-easy.co...
A system that other wins and never loses money? Sh-yeah, right! You might as capably stuff dollar bills under your pillow or into a jar.
Most systems any don't work half the times or are scam, and the ones that do in former times won't necessarily repeat their performance following. At best they are suggestions. People can take indistinguishable information and come up with ten different answers, and most of them can be wrong, and you can't notify which is right beforehand. Investing is common sense, some rough analysis and math (or hard math if you want), and some luck. Read as much as you can, but surrounded by the end not a soul in the world know the future for sure. There are no gurantees.
Give yourself a break, buy some index funds, sit final and beat most of the so-called pros contained by the world. Or learn the ground rules then buy and hold masses stocks you like for a long time, don't bring in a big fuss, and have some fun. Either approach, don't buy into the hype, and always scrutinize your costs (brokerage fees, commissions, fund expense ratios, etc)
Historic Stock Screener or Something Similar?
Question:
I am looking to put some custom systems to the test and I am looking for a program that can do this base on historic stock prices. Example. Buy Stock A when it breaks 50. Sell stock A when it either rises to 55 or falls to 47.5. historically is this profitable. Specific stock not necessarily crucial. I can do this manually but it takes a long time to receive a good preview size to prove a system.
Answers:
Tradestation should be able to bar your questions. It's something like $100/month. They give it to you for free if you trade profusely. (I mean a LOT.)
Most controlled screeners are going to have their prices in tune for splits and/or dividends, so such criteria probably won't work.
What you would need is a "point contained by time" database for stock screening, but they are usually very expensive. CompuStat, for example. Here is a blog entry next to links to a number of different screeners that are any free or very low cost:
http://www.thekirkreport.com/2007/01/sto...
Maybe one of them can do something similar to what you're trying to do.
Whats the effect on a company if the stock price drops?
Question:
In other words, what happens to the company if the price of their stock dramatically decline? I don't understand why it would effect the company? I would focus it only effects the stockholders but not the actual business itself.
Answers:
The stock price will impact any option or restricted stock that management and human resources are given as compensation. Also, many full-size US company Boards use stock price as a measurement of achieve objectives. So it may affect management and operation from that perspective.
Actual changes to the set off sheet or P&L will depend on if the company has any type of share buyback program. Last article - sometimes, net worth of a company is also nominated as a covenant on its borrowed money (debt), so if the equity value falls significantly, the company may defaulting on its debt.
Hi,
If the companies are big enough, it won't disturb them too much. If the companies are small and into a financial turmoil, it would result within drastic changes within their policies and approach. You can visit http://stocks.advisorinternet.info... for more info on this. Good luck!
I company's stock should other rise or remain constant at least. Nothing "actual" happen, but the price is based on investors expectations in the region of the company. Think of the price as a barometer of the level of confidence investors hold. The value of the company have decreased. This may increase the price they settle for debt.
If the price dropped dramatically, sometimes loans have to be recall if the price drops too low. Also, if the price drops too low they would be suscetible to a takeover and organization might be out of a job.
It depends on why the stock have fallen and by how much.
In standard, you're correct that it affects stockholders mostly. However, those corporate executives who never believe they've done anything wrong will be upset that their stock options are beneath water.
That may front to a number of corporate change, some good and some unpromising, which very possibly could affect the actual business model.
It affects their dexterity to raise brass. Borrowing becomes more expensive for them. It also routine the board will be under pressure from the flea market to make change that will restore the value of the company. Often that method reorganizations and job losses.
However, it does in a roundabout way affect their cash flow.
You are mixing up inflict and effect. The stock price usually drops when there is something wrong next to the company - long before the company comes out next to any official announcements or warning.
There are always society in the know who smell the rot and bail out ahead of the crowd.