The Depression 1929-1939 help out?
Question:
The market attraction of stocks inflated, and as prices of stocks rose, people get nervous and started massive flounder sell stocks. I don't achieve how this played a role in the Depression. Isn't this flawless because if stocks rise, then you market it, you'll make profit.
Answers:
at hand is always a cycle, any in business or monetary condition. at one point, people catch excited to invest in stock marketplace after hearing word after news that ethnic group make millions out of it short knowing that they are already too late to share. this are normally inexperience investors.
when experience investors found it capture overheated, they start selling their shares gradually, departure all the behind time comers to enjoy the remnants. as time goes by, the souk will later discover the stock be overvalued that most likely it offer less upside potential. this is where on earth the major provide down occurs. the trainee get nouns that their stock drop so much but can bear the losses, so they fixed to keep holding.
months after months, the price remain like peas in a pod or even decrease. the neophyte investors have smaller number money, so they control their expenditure. since major consumer enjoy less emergency, business start to get artificial.
Except that if EVERYONE sells, businesses step out of business, because stocks really are pieces of a business and provide funding to that business.
Also, the biggest piece that you're missing is that a lot of the stock be purchased on credit the 1920s. When the market started to drop, a lot of those society were forced to get rid of for LESS than they had bought, and thus owed deeply of money with no agency to pay it bad (remember, businesses were closing moved out and right, causing a tremendous amount of unemployment).
To make out how the crash in 1929 artificial peoples lives in 1929-1939 you enjoy to take a look at what happen in the prior decade.
You're correct that if stocks rise, and if family sell, they'll sort a profit. However, between 1919 and 1929 the market be doing so well that everyone be putting their money into the stock market.
When the crash occur in 1929, the population as a together took a tremendous hit. People lost a substantial portion of their savings. Furthermore, when society tried to take their money out of the dune in 1929, the bank didn't have ample cash on foot to handle the overwhelming emergency for cash.
So, entering the 1929-1939 extent, you had family with totally little in money and a distrust in bank.
It is true that the stock market increased within value between 1929-1939, but the population within general be not a part of that. Because the majority of the population have lost their savings within the prior decade, what happened contained by the Depression era was a widen gap between the haves and the hold nots.
Hope that helps and well brought-up luck!
No, you require a balanced souk to make money. Small differences between the number of general public selling and buying create conditions where stock prices will run up or down.
In this case, everyone needed to sell, and no-one required to buy, driving the price per share down at such a rate that the market essentially collapsed.
Shares hold no intrinsic value; they are just valued at the price someone is willing to salary for them. If investors stop buying a stock, the stock becomes worthless.
People be buying at 10% margin -- consequence they were going $9 into debt for every dollar they invested. This is great when the flea market goes up -- but cause bankruptcy when the souk goes down.
In extension, a lot of bank were speculating. There be no FDIC back consequently -- so if the bank go out of business, everyone lost their deposits.
Add to that a sever multi-year drought in the west and miswest -- and you enjoy trouble with a income T. It help that Hoover know nothing almost running a country.
Is at hand a no fluff book for beginers on how to create money within the stoke bazaar?
Question:
I have mutual fund investments.Im looking for short residence gains info.
Answers:
Short permanent status gains inf? You'll enjoy to look into the options souk for that. If you want solid investment principals then read/listen to the following books: "One Up On Wall Street" by Peter Lynch (legendary ex-fund mediator @ Fidelity), "Buffettology" and "The New Buffettology" by Marry Buffett (the ex-daughter in-law to Warren Buffett - richest billionaire investor).
"Stock Investing for Dummies"
http://www.amazon.com/investing-dummies-...
Try How to make money surrounded by stocks, by O'Neil
Stock Market for Dummies ***sorry, not you :))
The link below have simple, very simple hints...so perchance you can see if you want to buy the book later..
No. There are profusely of no fluff books. But any book that provides you with the fluency to get beyond the learner stage is going to contain more than fluff.
In my opinion trading for short possession gains is like mad harder than investing for longer periods. With long possession investing if your fundamental analysis is sound, consequently you can be somewhat assured that over time the stock will make you money. In short possession trading you have to be constantly on the look out for things that can move a stock sharply and soon.
Try Cramers "Real Money", he does a good mission telling what is required for investing, most population should just stay within mutual funds.
Consolidate or head off alone - 403(b) and 401(k)?
Question:
I have 2 403(b)'s and 1 401(k) from previous employer. I have looked into consolidating but one of my 403(b)'s charges 6% interest rate if I rollover my funds into a 401(k). My 401(k) is next to Fidelity while my 403(b)'s are with AXA Equitable and Investsmart. One of my 403(b) is over 10K while the other two are just about 1K. Should I consolidate or leave it alone? Any suggestions would be practical!
Answers:
Talk to Fidelity. Since you have your 401K beside them they have a pretty appropriate deal for you or so I am told. I would roll my 403 money into an IRA. I assume the funds surrounded by the 403b are class B shares. My opinion is that's a ripoff. That said I would pay packet the 6% and be done. Fidelity has a nice array of "NTF" funds available and I'm sure you will be unbelievably happy next to them.
Why and IRA? You have control over your money not your old-fashioned employer. Any organization that have class B shares in their 401,403, or 457 is not a suitable organization. That my inference!
Probably the most important consideration is the rate of return on your many accounts. If one is consistently doing better than another, then it may be a apt idea to consolidate into the best one. If they are adjectives returning similar rates, then here is less root to consolidate.
Talk to a Fidelity rep... most likely roll everything into one side...They handle 95% of the paperwork ...and you click on once to see where on earth you stand.
When is the lululemon IPO?
Question:
Anyone know the date trading starts?
Answers:
LULU has file a prospectus but the timing of the IPO has nonetheless to be announced (at least on the Nasdaq site). The form 8-A have been file, so I'd expect to see something soon.
According to IPOboutique.com it has a "Proposed trade date" of Friday 7/27/07
Where do I be in motion to invest within stocks and bonds?
Question:
I am interested in investing my money perceptively. I am considereing stocks and bonds but I dont know where to progress or what company. I live in Baton Rouge, LA. What would you suggest?
Answers:
Investing within "individual" stocks takes a great deal of knowledge and practice; so I would not suggest doing this until you take completely how the stock markets work.
Vanguard.com is just right for long term investors who want to swot about mutual funds, index funds, and exchange-traded-funds (ETFs). Trading funds is smaller quantity risky than trying to trade "individual" stocks.
Unless you plan on spending everyday of your life looking at stock charts trying to determine the best time to return with in and out of "individual" stocks, I would look into some sort of fund.
Also be amazingly careful roughly speaking asking for stock tips online. Most are probably worthless or contain unethical motives. Do not tumble for any Pump-and-Dump scams.
As far as books be in motion, I actually started out near the Investing for Dummies books, and they definitely pushed me contained by the right direction. To many other books hold their own agendas in my belief.
The websites below all contain plenty of FREE information to catch you started in the right direction.
scottrade.com
There are closely of companies on line as economically as brick and mortar places.
Online - Etrade, Sharebuilder, etc...
Off-line - Charles Schwab, Ameriprise, TD Waterhouse (these also have on-line), etc...
Just going to a brokerage firm is not adequate to begin investing perceptively.
If you do not know about stocks, bonds, mutual funds, REITS, Treasury Bills, CDs etc... a brokerage house will be of little support to you other than to volunteer you a selection of mutual funds that typically underperform the marketplace.
Start learning almost investing and what the stock market is, and wish what you specifically are looking for from your investment (20% ROI annually? More? Less? How much risk are you willing to filch? Can you lose everything you have invested and still be ok?) an later go confer to a firm.
If you don't know very much on the other hand, I'd recommend you start out investing in stocks and bonds via mutual funds. You can pick stock-based mutual funds any using indexes such as Vanguard's S&P 500 index (VINIX), or actively managed funds such as Bruce Berkowitz' Fairholme Fund (FAIRX) or Vanguard's Windsor II (VWNFX).
Bond funds can be indexes as ably -- for example, Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund (VBISX). But for bonds, I'd recommend you wait and only do stocks for now. The bond flea market is a little iffy, caught between low let go (due to low interest rates) and possible price drops in the in the neighbourhood future (due to the Fed's eventual raise of interest rates).
All funds mentioned above can be purchased directly from their respective companies. Vanguard in unique has low fees, relatively modest minimum investments, a cavernous variety of offerings, and an excellent reputation.
Look for a financial advisor surrounded by the yellow page. Smith Barney is a good company, also Edward Jones. Look for one that have been around a long time. Established companys are safer than different ones.
First read as much material on investing as possible. Three books are "How to Buy Stocks" by Louis Engel & Brendan Boyd and "Gaining on the Market" by Charles Rolo and lastly "Wall Street Words" by David L. Scott. Check for them on amazon.com if they are out of circulation.Then you should know how to contact a brokerage firm (just look in the Yellow Pages) they are contained by the phone book. Charles Schwab would not be a bad place for you to start. Also Barrons Financial Weekly is an excellent source of information. So is Standard and Poors Security Owners Stock Guide. Do not be afraid to ask question. At this time "index funds" that track the S&P 500 or the Dow Jones Industrial Average would be a great way to go and get your feet showery at investing without taking any harsh risks. Good Luck!
You can open an free Marketiva forex online trading statement , 5 USD live fund and 10000 USD virtual fund already in your portrayal.!
Open an free account: http://www.marketiva.fffy.com
Time to stop investing contained by 401K?
Question:
I am 28 and have be investing in 401K's since my first opportunity at the age of 21. I have lost money every year. Good discount. Bad econony,. I have done money flea market, done managed risk, changed plans and risk level. No matter what I do, it keep losing. Every change I research the 5 10 and 15 year averages and they other do great until I invest. I'm losing faith surrounded by the 401K process. I just took a foreign job and I wont be vested until 3 years of service, and not 100% until 5 years. I dont plan to stay here that long. Right now they ONLY fund that is to say making money under my employer plan in the money flea market which is making 1/4 of 1% interest. I know yanking the lolly out is an automatic loss but is it time to stop putting money in the plan an investing it elsewhere instead (CD's perchance?). Thoughts?
Answers:
what are you investing in and what choices does your employer make a contribution you...if you have vanguard/fidelity or t rowe price as option go for them and in them stick with a stock mutual funds...sp 500 mortal an excellent overall choice...but even money markets or bond funds are paying 5%+ currenlty so you should not be losing money
Past reading is no guarantee for future actions.
401(k) are great if your employer is matching your contributions, but otherwise not much different from an IRA.
If near is no matching benefit, I would pinch the same amount and undo an IRA - it will be pre-tax money like the 401(k) - and look at other investment vehicle in lieu of mutual funds.
You will requirement to start learning just about what investing is other than putting your money surrounded by a fund that someone else manages.
The marketplace has risk - financial literacy reduce that risk by enabling you to spawn informed choices.
Your employers must own some really terrible choices surrounded by their 401k. I can not even conceive that it is possible that a 401k could have lost money during the concluding 5 years. It is almost impossible. You are not kidding us are you?
Role your 401k into a traditional IRA beside either Fidelity, T Rowe Price, or Vanguard. Once here invest the money into one of their Target date retirement funds. For you that would be 2030 more or less. Now indeed there will be some years when the fund will not kind money but overall it should net you in the region of 8% to 10% annually.
Have you tried putting it in the S&P 500? I retired at 52 and made money every year until 9/11 happen. Since then Ive made it adjectives back and more. Most mutual funds spawn money--not sure what happened to you.
It's really really knotty to have lost money that consistently since, enunciate, 1Q 2003. I'd love to hear what your plan offers to be precise THAT bad.
Perhaps the problem might that you're chasing gig -- that is, that you keep hold of switching to what was hot LAST year, instead of diversifying and spreading your investment among a few sub-markets. This is the failing of a number of greenhorn investors. If that sounds sort of familiar, consider picking a sensible, diversified asset allocation plan from among the best of your 401k choices and freshly sticking to that. Or, as another poster suggested, put all of your money into a target retirement date fund approaching Fidelity Freedom's 20xx series, if that's available to you.
A 401K is a long term investment. That medium if you look at it in year 1 and later again in year 10, it should own increased in utility by at least 10%. In another 10 years, another 10%.
First, I suspect you enjoy been shifting your selections too frequently. A 401K should mostly be disappeared alone to mature slowly.
Second, a money open market fund really has no place surrounded by your investment strategy at your age. You need to remain at lowest possible 80% in stock flea market funds.
Third, you should avoid managed funds if indexed funds are available, and clearly high risk sector. You will do better if you put the money mostly into a broad stock market fund (like the Vanguard Total Stock Market Fund) and go it there.
Your leading problem is that you don't understand your risk tolerance. In the souk things go down from time to time - sometimes for a long time of year of time. Then you buy more; you don't sell out of that fund. Eventually that investment will come wager on up, and the shares you bought cheaply will increase in pro.
CDs and money markets are for ripened people - over 60. Stay beside equities, and roll the money over into a new IRA if you can't roll it into another 401K.
It's the time to stop and start ruminate about what you hold been doing surrounded by the past 7 years, try to put some lead line on the route cause of that results, start make analysis on reason.
You seem to be the thoughtful of unlucky person, Are you Libra?
May be you involve to start making the opposite.
You appear also to be kind of a character whom want to do investment just because its fobia. I would support you to stop your investment for say 3 months, monitor the bazaar, seek advocate from the experts , I'm afraid to don't know how to make the analysis and you achieve the wrong results. Stop your investing action without beating about the bush.
What is a apt explanation for a PE ratio surrounded by a stock?
Question:
Answers:
P/E= price of share divded by the company's earnings. simple
simply, it's the price per share of stock (P) divided by the proceeds (E) per share of stock.
company A has 100 shares of stock outstanding
Current price for the stock is 5.00 per share.
The company made $100 profit ending year ($1/share)
P/E ratio is 5:1
The P/E ratio is different industries means different things so you can't newly compare P/E ratios of 2 different companies and voice one is better than the other, etc.
Usually, the lower the P/E ratio, the better value the stock is because the reverse E/P is the return on investment roughly
$1/$5 = 20% earnings/price
as a shareholders, you have rights to the company's income. to know how much is yours, you have to divide the total income to the no of share,
earnings per share = total returns / no of shares
and the market will utility the stock from its eanings per share. if it grows from previous year, it stock price will also most probabyly do.
P/E = Stock price / earnings per share
if the stock price doesn't increase beside the increase of its earnings per share, the stock price is at discount! to reword it, the lower the P/E, the more worth you'll probably be getting. i call it probbably because P/E shouldn't be the just thing to attraction the stock.
Step-by-Step Stock Investing for Beginners
http://www.stock-investment-made-easy.co...
The P/E ratio tells you how much the flea market is willing to reward for $1 per share of a company's profits. Example: P/E of 30 means the flea market is willing to wages $30 for every $1 a company makes contained by profit. Forward P/E (i.e., next year's P/E is more key than the current P/E, but it should be compared with the company's historic P/E, and the P/E of it's competitors).
Multiple...CHOICE!!?
Question:
1 - The main disadvantage of using shells as money, instead of coins, would be a absence of:
a - durability.
b - portability.
c - uniformity.
d - divisibility.
2 - An example of representative money would be:
a - a fur coat.
b - diamonds.
c - gold earrings.
d - an IOU facts.
3 - _________ is / are NOT example of a liquid asset.
a - A permit of deposit
b - Cash
c - Traveler's checks
d - A checking account
4 - A _________ is an example of a financial intermediary.
a - life span insurance company
b - stock certificate
c - ridge vault
d - bond
5 - You do not own to pay state taxes on interest earn on:
a - corporate bonds.
b - money market mutual funds.
c - unwanted items bonds.
d - municiple bonds.
Thank you!
Answers:
1. c (since no two shells are the same size, there's no "standard")
2. d (IOU can be exchanged for a specific amount of money)
3. a (all are technically gooey assets since they can all be slickly converted to cash, but CD's involve a cost for early withdrawl)
4. a (only the vivacity insurance company is an institution that can service savers/lenders and spenders/borrowers)
5. d (assuming the municipal bonds are issued within the state surrounded by which taxes are paid)
a
b
c
d
1. B
2. D
3. B
4. C
5. B
(no idea, mostly guesses, sorry!)
1-b
2-d
3-a
4-a
5-d
How do stocks kind money?
Question:
If I bought a stock at a price, then subsequent year it is worth 3 times that price... what made people feeling like to buy my stock for 3 times as much? So what about the companies proceeds, etc. What benefit is it to them? Why did I really make money?
Answers:
you can bring money either from property gain (price appreciation) or cashflow (dividend). once you the stock, you are one of the company's shareholder. and as a shareholder, you have right to the company's proceeds.
as the company grow their earnings per share, marketplace will reflect their efficacy from the stock price increase. and also because the price has a direct correlation next to its earnings per share (price to profits ratio, P/E, PER).
benefit to people who buy the stock? powerfully, they've the right to the company's future growth. and if the stock competent to continue growing, they'll also gain.
Step-by-Step Stock Investing for Beginners
http://www.stock-investment-made-easy.co...
When you buy a stock, you literally own a piece of the company. If the company make more money than expected or develops a promising new product file, then the helpfulness of the company increases, and thus, the price of each share increases as okay.
Also, if the company is expected to make more money contained by the future, citizens will pay more for a share because they believe that the company will verbs to make more money and thus the share price will verbs to go up.
Stocks spawn money for two reasons. One other populace will pay for them and if the emergency for your stock increases then your stock will be worth more and you can deal in for a profit.
Another foundation of the stock value that must be talk about is the dividend. If a stock income a dollar per share dividend then you are getting money support. It is like to a degree owning an apartment building and receiving a portion of the rents.
If the stock be 20 dollars and you get a dollar dividend later you will make your 20 bucks final over 20 years and then some more resting on that. This is the reason why stocks hold much of their value.
A really polite question.
In argument the price of a stock should be equal to the discounted value of the adjectives cash flows realizable from the company-- within plain English this means that a company should be worth the appeal of the dividends it pays out over the course of its lifetime, adjusted to thieve into account the certainty that a dollar you earn ten years down the road is effectively less expensive to you than a dollar you earn now (because you can reinvest the dollar you earn very soon...)
In general stocks move up when investors are given reason to think that the long occupancy cash flows (earnings) generate by a particular company are potential to be larger than was previous anticipated. For example voice a small drug company suddenly announces that it has discovered a cure for cancer. Investors will be likely to pay more for the company's stock because it will know how to earn more money and pay more dividends contained by the future than be previously anticipated. If something bad happen the process works in reverse.
What are the risks involved beside investing within bonds? What can one do to minimize risk when investing contained by bonds?
Question:
Answers:
It depends on what type of bonds you're talking going on for. US Treasure bonds are about as risk-less as you can carry for an investment. The US Treasury has never default on a bond payment, and so have the highest possible credit rating. The foundation for this is that the government have the unique faculty to just excise its citizens in command to make the bond payments.
Foreign bonds are somewhat more risky, depending on the country. Obivously the more stable the country, such as the UK, France, etc., the safer the bond. The risk to investing surrounded by bonds of less stable countries is the risk that the country will not be capable of make its bond payments - so financial or political collapse would be the main source of risk here.
You can also invest surrounded by bonds of munipalities, states, cities, etc. These also tend to be relatively safe, unless the organization of the city or state can't make the bond payments. In countries approaching the US, they usually do, but it's not as safe as US Treasury bonds.
And afterwards there are corporate bonds, and these go down into a number of category or classes. Investment grade bonds are riskier than command bonds, but still relatively safe - and hence usually don't deliver very soaring returns. Again, the risk is that the company will not make its bond coupon payments. Big firms similar to General Electric or Boeing will have fundamentally high credit ratings, reflecting their aptitude to pay these debts. Corporate bonds are rate from AAA (the highest), down to D (the lowest). Bonds at the lower end are considered "dignified yield" or what people used to call for "junk bonds." As other, the risk here is that the company will not pay competent to make the bond coupon payments. But beside companies on the lower end of the ratings, the risk get very illustrious. Often these bonds are sold at a significant discount to the face effectiveness, because nobody believes the company will actually know how to make adjectives of the payments.
A bond is essentially a loan, so with adjectives of these, the source of risk stems from the question of "will this entity be capable of pay me rear legs?" And that depends on the stability and revenue-generating potential of the entity. The best way to minimize risk is to invest within high-grade bonds - but these offer lower returns. There's really no free-lunch contained by bond investing. If you want to minimize your overall risk in bonds relative to your expected return, the best point to do would be to diversify your portfolio. Put some money in domestic treasuries, some surrounded by foreign treasuries, some in corporate bonds at varied credit rating levels. The individual allocation will depend on how much risk you're willing to adopt.
Good luck!
Risk of default
Risk of lost opportunity
Buy investment class bonds; create a ladder of increasing maturies; invest within short and intermediate term bonds.
Investing surrounded by bonds involves two risks.
First is the risk of default. Every bond is rate, and the better the rating, the lower the risk of default. If the bond default, you are screwed.
You can mitigate this risk by buying bonds with smaller number risk, buying bonds from a lot of different companies, or buying a bond mutual fund. FDIC-insured CDs and T-bills are also types of bonds that effectively take no default risk (short of consipiracy theorists).
The second type of risk is interest rate risk. If interest rates move about up, the value of your bonds be in motion down. If interest rates go down, the attraction of your bonds go up. This risk affects adjectives bonds similarly, so diversification can't help you. If you intend to hang on to all of your bonds to parenthood, you don't have to verbs about this risk - you know your return.
-->Adam
Who owns AAPL and what do you come up with it's gonna appear after 3rd Qtr financial date comes out on the 25th?
Question:
Answers:
There are a LOT of factors within play here, which include:
1) Apple is up HUGE in former times several months. In early February, the stock be going for under $85 a share. Now, somewhat over 6 months later, it's going for nearly $144 a share, or in the order of a 70% increase.
2) The volatility of the overall market have risen dramatically over the past several months, and we're seeing core shifts back and forth, sooner or later way up, another opening down. It's got closely of investors nervous, and copious "experts" are calling for a correction of anywhere from 5-10% or more.
3) There's a TON of other companies reporting this week besides Apple, and any number of them could "spook" the market (much similar to CAT and GOOG last week). Stocks close to TXN or AMZN could send the entire tech sector down, while stocks approaching CFC could scare the entire souk with the "subprime" issue adjectives over again.
With that in mind, I would expect to see Apple go and get hit with some profit taking going into the telephone, but you might even see the overall market bring a hit even before we obtain to the 25th. I'd be a little surprised if Apple's up much from its current horizontal when the market open on the 26th.
Long term, I expect Apple to pave the way towards $200 unless there's a stock split, but I think we'll see it hit some bumps contained by the road along the way that will hand over us buying opportunities surrounded by the $125 range.
By the agency... I currently have a small position surrounded by Apple and will be putting in a buy writ somewhere below the $140 to see if I can add to it on a dip.
Its purely my opinion but I contemplate AAPL is over-priced right now. It's my belief that adjectives of the Iphone hype is currently priced into the stock and I see alot more downside than room to go up. But what do I know..
Apple stock have been doing amazingly ably over the last 8 months. People will be looking at these financials to see how the iphone have effected their revenues. I believe the price may verbs to drive up as this information gets closer at mitt. We may see profit taking the following day of the report which can be expected. This happens heaps times when companies report good yield.
However, I do believe Apple willcontinue to climb because they have heaps products due out this year that will continue to bring more and more switchers of the PC to the Mac giving them more revenues and more profit.
All I own to say is that if AT&T comes out next to really blow away numbers from this I-phone deal the time before--actually tommorrow, then it may look really devout for Apple. I think its overpriced too but sometimes catching a flounder might work. Just be ready to verbs the plug always beside a stop loss order a moment ago in grip.
If I own a stock for one year, and the price is like peas in a pod at the finishing of the year, did I sort any money?
Question:
Dividends or something or no?
Answers:
Did it pay any dividends? Not adjectives stocks pay dividends. And if it did wage dividends, you have to state the income on it, and pay taxes on it. What most individuals invest for is not for the dividends, but for increases in the expediency of the stock over time. To make a long answer short, no you didn't fashion any money. Course, to make any money even if the stock did rise, you'd own to actually put on the market it, and then retribution income taxes on your gain. Otherwise, all you would own would be unrealized gains.
you don't construct money on a dividend, because when it pays out it will drop the share price by the amount paid. If the stock doesn't move you don't brand name money, you answered your own question.
example
50 share
5 dividend
you seize 5 bucks plus you have to remuneration taxes on it,
value of share drops to 45 its a rinse you still have indistinguishable amount of money minus the taxes.
Nope. You didn't make money. In certainty, you lost a little: (A) because you rewarded sales commission when you bought the stock and (B) because you could enjoy had the money sitting contained by a risk-free account earn a little interest.
But one year isn't ample time to evaluate an investment. The real cross-examine is whether or not the fundamentals that induced you to purchase the stock in the first place are still present. If they are, and you still believe contained by your decision, next give the marketplace time to catch up.
Of course, as you mention, you might own made some dividend income along the way.
Only if you drew dividends during the year, (think of them similar to Interest earned from a bank). Otherwise, if you put on the market it at the same price you bought it at, you will lose money lattice, because you also have to foot broker's fees.
is this like a proposition question or something?
You COULD hold made money if:
1. the stock split and now you enjoy 2x shares at the same price
2. it remunerated a dividend and the price has returned to one and the same value as it be one year ago
you'll still get dividend (if any). in need any dividend, you won't get any money if you don't deal in them. even if your stock skyrocketed to a new lofty, you still get no money too. it is purely that your paper asset increase within value.
it is true that the stock prices are in general drop after dividend ex-date. but normally, the price will find 'supported' again as the new investors will come backbone later.
and because flawless company doesn't necessarily is a good stock, border of safety is exalted to reduce risk of the stock price flattened or exhaust even without any report etc.
Step-by-Step Stock Investing for Beginners
http://www.stock-investment-made-easy.co...
Assume the stock pays no dividend.
You have a loss, in print. That is because you paid a commission when you bought the stock. Since you stated the stock price is duplicate, your cost basis is greater than the current marketplace value by the amount of your commission. If you get rid of you have the superfluous loss of a second commission.
Assume the stock pays a dividend.
Now the question is whether or not the dividend is hulking enough to cover your commission. If it is, you made money. Otherwise you didn't.
If your dollar investment be large (say $10,000) after your commission was outstandingly low on a percentage basis. And if your dividend be high, (say 10%) you didn't do too disappointingly. Using those assumptions, and also that you used a discount broker and paid $7.00 commission, your gain would be $993.00 formerly taxes. Since you held the stock a year, you would be taxed a lower rate.
How come in that are different stock market?
Question:
i dont understand.every company have their own stock prices...right?
what's the difference between having different stock market?
i meant what's the point of it.
do respectively stock markets hold same companies...
for example, can you buy microsoft shares from nasdaq and nyse...etc...
Answers:
No. Companies are listed on the NYSE or NASDAQ or AMEX. They cannot be planned on more than one.
We need Pepsi and Coca-Cola.
Monopolies are doomed to failure for your health.
If you want to buy Microsoft later you need to buy them on the NASDAQ.
Each Stock Market have diferent companies and some companies trade on several Stock Markets (Only Multinational Companies can afford that)
Example:
Teléfonos de México (One of the largest companies in the World) trades on the New York Stock Exchange and also on the Bolsa Mexicana de Valores.
How to monitor your investments within the nigerian stock echange?
Question:
Answers:
I would think you would want to find out how to monitor them earlier every putting any money in near. 2nd, I would be really careful give or take a few investing in that country. Are you sure they even own a stock exchange. I know they have plenty of scammers. Are you sure they even own a stock exchange there??
Hi,
I used "Rockwell Trading Strategies" to engineer consistent profits.With these strategies, they really simplified my trading and I don't have to use anymore the complicated formulas and indicators.
Now, they're offering 100% contentment guarantee.If you don't see a major alteration by applying the strategies,they will not only compensation your investment, they will pay you $1001… out of their own pocket.Check it out here:
http://tinyurl.com/3dea5d
If u be a millionaire?Will u invest within Africa?
Question:
Answers:
What part of Africa? The Middle East? Sub-Saharan Africa? South Africa?
I would invest surrounded by a few select African companies in positive countries, but your question is unclear.
It would be sort of like asking ... "Would you invest surrounded by North America," without individual specific as to which companies in which countries.
I would hand down that up to my president George Bush he has invested plenty of all of the USA rates dollars
I'll leave that to Oprah Winfrey.
Yes, for a time bit.
I am not a millionaire, but I do invest in "emerging markets" surrounded by my 401k, which includes some in Africa.
I first would be indebted that I had the funds to sustain others. As far as Africa, why is this the place you question. Do you enjoy some interest in the citizens , or the area?
Where do you currently live?
I would divide the funds to different areas so that nearby is more places that would receive the generous offering that you have to give.
Also as far as invest , are you meaning to make a contribution or to really invest?
Yes, if i were a millionaire i would emphatically invest in Africa. This is so because in attendance are lots of people who are underneath poverty and they are in dire necessitate of employment to earn a living. They could hardly munch through 3 times a day. I am an Asian but I pity those from Africa.
Except of course, those areas of Africa which are develop close to South Africa and others.
I think nearby are safer emerging markets than Africa.
Eastern Europe is the best at the moment especially Bulgaria, Croatia and Turkey. The Turkish discount is growing faster than most global economy and property prices are still rising at between 25 - 40% per year.
The ruling AK Party is pushing foreign investment in everything from concrete estate, golf tourism, shopping centres, petroleum refinery, gold, copper, the account goes on.
Check these reference:
http://www.pashacorporation.com...
http://www.investinturkey.gov.tr...