Can a bullet-proof vest run a Howitzer shell?
Question:Answers:
No
Other Answers:
maybe
Test it out and permit us know.
can a umbrella help you contained by a fall from a 20 story bldg. does that answer your sound out
More often than not, a bullet-proof vest cannot whip a bullet. This was the second silliest cross-examine I have ever see on here!
i dont believe so and the shrapnel would probably kill you anyways
no i dont ruminate so,
in premise yes. But a person wearing it would be kill by the shock wave and force
very well, if the gun was firing from maximum band, and it missed, then yes. if, no way.
All depends on the bullet-proof vest really. But undoubtedly short of a protective bullet-proof cocoon, the vest could survive a howitzer shell hit better than the personality wearing said vest
do adjectives work at home job hold to settle formerly starting?
Question:Answers:
no if you find a real one if you enjoy to pay up front it is a scam
Other Answers:
If you are looking at one of the everlasting "opportunities" out there mind - most are scams. Here are a few question you should ask to help digit out if the one you are looking at is for real or not.
Legitimate work-at-home program should let somebody know you - in writing - what's involved surrounded by the program they are selling. Here are some questions you might ask:
* What tasks will I own to perform? (Ask the program to enumerate every step of the job.)
* Will I be rewarded a salary or will my pay packet be based on commission?
* Who will reward me?
* When will I get my first paycheck?
* What is the total cost of the work-at-home program, including supplies, equipment and devotion fees?
* What will I get for my money?
What does it parsimonious when a country buys our debt? Ex: Japan have bought 600+ BILLION of our debt.?
Question:Answers:
It means that one country lent us money, but another country have now taken on responsibility for that debt and will receive payments surrounded by the future.
i.e.
China lend us $1bn at 10% interest
Now, if China needs lolly quickly and Japan have lots of cash it requests to use, Japan could buy the debt off of China. It could wages China $1.05 billion so China makes some money on the operate and then could pinch the payment of $1.1bn from the US so Japan make money too.
Other Answers:
it is an effort to artificially stabilize a sinking currency
hi
indistinguishable way another mortgage company buys mortgages. they money off adjectives of the people we owe money to, next charge us a little extra to recompense it off and brand name some mnoney for themselves in the close.
It means what it say. When our government wishes to spend more money than it takes within taxes, it issues bonds (which are debt). These bonds pay interest.
The Bank of Japan (and others, including American citizens) can buy these. We consequently earn interest on them, and when they expire, the government give us our money back.
The merely difference between an American citizen and a foreign government buying them is that the foriegn rule pays with its own currency which increases the emergency for US$ and decreases the emergency for Yen, which keeps their currency at a lower effectiveness (and this makes exports from Japan to US cheaper).
It's not a problem, it's the means of access the world works. You like cheap stuff right? It's one cut of globalization.
It's just another agency of saying they are lend us money by buying bonds.
Governments (and corporations) often borrow money by selling bonds. All a bond is is an IOU--you buy the bond from the parliament for $100, and they agree to give you $4.50 for respectively of the next 30 years, and also make available you your $100 back thirty years from presently. The reason you utter 'buy a bond' is that in the antiquated days, you actually did buy a book of coupons that you could dispatch in once a year to achieve your $4.50. Of course, that's long gone, but the term remains.
Most countrys' centralized banks hold a reserve of foreign exchange--that is, a large amount of a solid currency (almost other US dollars, sometimes Euros or Yen) that they can use to back up their own currency if needed. This is sort of similar to the way that the U.S. used to maintain gold surrounded by Ft. Knox to back up the dollar.
So, when a country buys debt, it funds tht their central wall is buying U.S. Treasury Bonds to keep as a reserve to wager on up their own currency.
There's a little more to this, though. U.S. Treasury Bonds are sold contained by dollars, so you need to own dollars to buy them. These days the U.S. has a huge trade inequality (we buy more from other countries than we sell to them), so race in lots countries are finding themselves with lots of US Dollars. Since these dollars are useless to them--you can't buy lunch within Tokyo with U.S. money--they hold to find something to do with them. In several cases, foreign governments will buy up the dollars and them use them to buy U.S. Bonds. If they didn't do this, the U.S. trade stability would have to be resovled through a weakining of the dollar.
Sorry that's so long winded. The short book is that the U.S. is living beyond its means, but other countries are feeling like to support us in this by lend our government money. There's disagreement as to if this is a correct or bad entity, and if it can go on forever or not.
If I own a 100% ROI that finances I'm breaking even, right?
Question:Answers:
Actually, it could mean that you're opening ahead ... depends on the time frame.
Example:
$100 invested on January 1st.
March 31st they paid you a $50 dividend ... that's 50/100 or 50% Return on your investment ... contained by that quarter.
June 30th they paid you a dividend of $75 ... that's 75% ROI
... but $50 + $75 = $125 / 100 = 125% ROI ...
See what I parsimonious ?
Other Answers:
no that is not correct
ROI is (total profit / total invested). If you invested 100 and get back 100, your profit is 0, so your ROI would be 0 within that case.
You would own to get subsidise 200 on 100 to have 100% ROI.
Marketing Plans?
Question:Marketing Plans?Where I can find Marketing plans for known companies on the network?
Answers:
Mplans.com http://www.mplans.com has several free examples of marketing plans from mixed companies.
However, almost all specified companies do not publish their marketing plans (other than the bits and pieces you see in their SEC filings) as it could grant ammunition to their competitors.
Other Answers:
Public companies have a fiduciary responsibility to report anything that will affect their financial celebration. This will often include a supervision discussion as part of their annual and quarterly reports. You're looking for the text-portion of these reports, not their actual financials. In this portion of their reports, you'll find a discussion of market trends, at the terribly least. You can gain what markets they work within, where they are strongest, their souk saturation, trends in their bazaar, and other information that can be often used within a marketing plan. They won't often disclose tactical steps, a crucial part of the pack of a marketing plan, but only strategic significance of their endeavors.
These are gather, among other places, at the wall street journal and Yahoo Finance.
For private companies, this information is not readily shared. The best you can regularly do is see if they've written a self-promoting business book of some kind. Often founders of companies write books on business topics that are seldom more than touting their own souk position and genius. You can scrape together some of their market position proposal from these, but not necessarily get the undamaged story.
If you're looking for good resources of how this process is done, you'd be better stale with The Art of the Start by Guy Kawasaki (Apple's Marketing Guy for abundant years). This is a good guide to bazaar position without getting administratively pouring for startups. Also, Wiley puts out a good broad guide to marketing plans that will be found in most broad book stores (like a Barnes & Noble) that would be a good guide for writing a comprehensive guide.
Good luck.
Source(s):
http://finance.yahoo.com/
http://wsj.com
Why is everything more expensive for Canadians?
Question:I've noticed surrounded by the past 28 years of living contained by the US that everything is much more expensive for Canadians that the US. Why is this? Just curious. And I'm sure we learned it within school, I only just can't recall ;)!Answers:
It's the price they clear for being spared George W. Bush!
Other Answers:
Because American Dollars are worth more next Canadian Dollars.
they have more money, honey. lol. you look righteous babe. wanna be friends?
My sister and brother-in-law live in Canada. Seal Flippers and Moose Antlers are a barter compared to the States.
I go next to comic_geek05-Because American Dollars are worth more then Canadian Dollars.
Because of our tariff system where we enjoy both provincial and federal sale tax, we enjoy both federal and provincial income levy, we also have a general health-care system that is funded by these taxes. Canadians usually work through until June 16th beforehand any of the money they earned is theirs up until that point surrounded by time it's all going to jump to the government. The cost for a gallon gas surrounded by Canada as of July 6 th is approximately $4.48 per gallon, most of this again is taxes and Canada imports no grease from the Middle East. This is part of the sense and only chunk of the reason why costs more surrounded by Canada.
where on earth can i go and get master exposition on accounting or nouns?
Question:Answers:
At your college library. They keep departed thesis on database.
Other Answers:
Don't forget to choose the best answer.
We are real nation answering real question with TRUE answers so please show your appreciation by choosing the best answer!
It is scary that you are getting your Masters and that you are looking HERE for assist!
I'm going to assume that you're a student -- who else in the world would be looking for thesis?!?
Go to your university's library -- as an academic librarian myself, I attain these kinds of question pretty regularly -- and work with a librarian. If your university grant Masters degrees later they keep copies of the thesis, and you can probably search the library's catalog to see what's available.
Also, if your library have access to the electronic database Dissertations & Theses (or something like it) you may know how to search that database, and find full-text, online access to some theses.
http://www.custom-writing.com/
Can anyone aid me find information on "ZERO DEFECT" or Total Quality Leadership?
Question:Search engines haven't really helped me, I be hoping that someone knew of a website or magazine that could describe a process or its benefits.Answers:
I focus the phrase you really want is "Total Quality Management" not leadership. You may also want to look at "Sigma 6" and "Just contained by time inventory" as G00GLE searches if you're looking for that sort of information.
Other Answers:
try entering ISO 9000 on explore engine they are pretty comprehensive.
Zero irregularity is only a concept on what to strive for. That is to say-so no defects detected for a given lot of manufactured products lot after lot. Perfection!
Discuss the world all-embracing change that make us inevitability information systems?
Question:Answers:
Compromise on climate change legislation appears to be increasingly expected in Washington. All the stars are aligning within a way that would push a compromise forward: Gasoline prices are illustrious, the Middle East and Venezuela are creating complex challenges for U.S. foreign policy, Nigeria is increasingly anarchic, and scientific findings are accumulate that confirm temperatures worldwide are indeed rising.
Into this atmosphere comes Earth First!, a group whose name within the past have been synonymous next to the term "ecoterrorism" and which in a minute is dedicated to dramatic direct handling protest. Promising to block access to refineries, hassle executives and otherwise make a great deal of noise, Earth First! have formed a coalition -- Rising Tide North America -- that says it will permeate a longstanding void within climate change activism. But while the fresh coalition is bound to make reverberation over the coming years, its impact on public policy likely will be much smaller than that of contemporary harsh direct-action campaigns.
Rising Tide argues that U.S.-based climate renovation activism is too staid. The coalition's leaders fret that the public debate is dominated by mainstream environmental groups that excel surrounded by lobbying strategies, advertising and traditional public relations campaign. From the Earth First! perspective, these groups do not bring energy or love to campaigns, and they compromise too readily on historic issues. The implicit argument is that rank-and-file Americans -- including grassroots activists -- own never truly engaged on the climate tuning issue.
This criticism is generally on target. Climate rework is a priority concern in most of the industrialized world -- witness the maelstrom of angst this week over the announcement that the European Union's emission trading system is not working. The United States, by comparison, is a cool, calm and collected backwater as far as this issue is concerned.
The reasons for the split within perspectives are myriad. First, environmentalism is more boomingly embedded within the politics of most industrialized countries than it is in the United States. Further, contained by many countries, concern almost climate change is a inscribe of erudition; in others, it have become a political statement about man different from Americans. Japan, meanwhile, considers itself "home" to the Kyoto Protocol, and expressing concern about climate adjustment is a patriotic issue. Finally and importantly, activist in other countries hold done a better job of convincing the public that climate metamorphosis is a serious matter that requires affairs of state action.
The Slope
Within the United States, climate redeploy has traveled an unusual pathway in the public policy cycle. It did not follow the typical route from obscurity to the public mind as similar issues do, and as a result, infallible attributes are missing from the debate -- including strong grassroots support for federal action on climate amend.
Usually, a policy issue travels a predictable path -- from a crude idea, issue or concern to a fully developed policy issue that is in position for political attention.
In the initial stages of the cycle, a concept usually is driven by an individual or small group. It is articulated in different ways by many small organizations -- normally by groups deemed "radical" by the standard public -- until it becomes a concern for larger crusader groups that have attained a guaranteed level of credibility next to the public. Over time, the issue becomes appealing to increasingly credible nongovernmental organization, and ultimately to groups that are not necessarily viewed as striker. Once credible nonactivist organizations hold embraced the view, it moves into the mainstream -- where on earth public policy is debated and eventually formed.
Once the issue is articulated surrounded by such a way that the public understand the problem, its causes and possible resolutions, time become short for those who want to help shape how the final policy is made. Lobbyists and public-relations professionals fire up to work in earnest to promote the issue or to conquest it. They excel at framing issues and selling ideas to the middle-of-the-road public. And though such professional actors may indeed be devoted about sundry causes, they do not bring one and the same type of energy to the debate as do the grassroots activist who fought to bring the issue to the public's mind.
It is significant that, if an issue follows this natural evolution from the fringes to the common, its importance over time does not dissipate among the grassroots activist who initially put energy, sweat and time into making the issue an critical popular concern. True, at the end of the process, grassroots activist often might be aware of "sold out," since the professional lobbying groups in Washington inevitably must construct trades and concessions to get a policy passed that address the issue. However, the groups at the negotiating table are slightly aware of the grassroots pressure in the public, and -- while compromise is basic -- the stronger the grassroots support for a policy, the more difficult it is for key demands to slump victim to compromise.
Fast-Tracked
In the United States, the climate adapt issue skipped this typical cycle.
Climate change begin as a concern for a few scientists and environmentalists, and then it be an issue promoted by the most credible national environmental groups. Because of this, it did not have to be articulated to grassroots environmentalists or to local promoter groups in a compelling mode. Thus, grassroots activists be never challenged to consider whether climate switch was an issue worth sacrifice for or worth fighting going on for. The issue became (and largely remains) a priority concern for merely a portion of the environmental movement.
There are historical reasons for this.
With the creation of a national environmental movement surrounded by the late 1960s, environmentalism contained by the United States focused mainly on pollution. The national movement -- typified by groups such as Environmental Defense (founded as the Environmental Defense Fund) and Natural Resources Defense Council -- established colossal offices contained by Washington to lobby for enforcement of the new Clean Air Act and Clean Water Act, to litigate beneath the citizen-suit provisions of these laws and to spar for the passage of similar law.
Their success brought increasing numbers of environmental groups to Washington. Over time, the environmental lobby become an institution in Washington -- much approaching labor, the Chamber of Commerce and other interests.
Climate change become a concern among a few activists surrounded by the mid-1980s, and the issue almost immediately found a all set audience among the most credible environmental groups in the country. Anti-pollution activist, who long had be concerned with the ecosystem impair from oil exploration, the heavens pollution from refineries and the green impacts of burning grease and coal, determined that climate change held great promise as a policy issue.
Environmentalists' reaction to the early climate money discussions were clearly articulated by then-Sen. Timothy Wirth, D-Colo., within a 1988 speech before the Senate: "What we've get to do in punch conservation is to try to ride the global warm issue. Even if the theory of intercontinental warming is wrong, to hold approached global warm as if it is real resources energy conservation, so we will be doing the right piece anyway in jargon of economic policy and environmental policy." Thus, from the earliest stages of the discussion, the prevailing panorama among groups concerned about verve conservation, air pollution and offshore grease production was that feat to stop climate change -- whether called for or not -- entailed doing environmentally beneficial things. It be a powerful tactic, regardless of whether the science bore out concerns for the climate in the shutting.
In other words, climate change policy have been a project of the staid Washington environmental lobby almost from the start, and the rapid adoption by the widely held meant that the standard policy nouns process -- which entails years of debate and demonstration -- was curtailed.
But on the flip side of the equation, climate make over activists never be required to capture the imagination of the public or uplift grassroots environmentalists to get involved surrounded by order to bring attention to the problem. People be not needed to hold signs outside power plants and refinery; there be no need for massive letter-writing campaign to newspaper editors or communication networks. Without grassroots involvement in the promotion of the issue, the medium -- particularly local medium -- never were forced to pinch a hard look at the issue. In short, political handling on climate change be never contingent on people becoming zealous about it; attorneys at Environmental Defense (and other massive groups) had it underneath control from the beginning.
Bringing Grassroots Pressure to Bear
Enter Earth First!, which surrounded by forming the Rising Tide coalition has tacitly acknowledged that enthusiastic grassroots interest in climate changeover policy is still missing. By taking action at this time, the group is signaling a alarm that climate change will be treated contained by Congress as an issue on which easy compromises are possible. The types of compromises that can effortlessly be envisioned -- for instance, trading higher CAFE standards for offshore grease drilling, or nuclear energy for biofuels -- are see as weakening climate revision policy. Rising Tide North America seems to believe that through direct movement protests and direct corporate campaigns, the group can brand name it more difficult for political leaders to compromise on key issues.
It probably cannot. The poor standard with climate metamorphose policy ultimately is not merely the lack of direct handling, but that climate change did not shift through the normal trials and tribulations. On most legislation, a congressman's constituents row over the issue for years before a single lobbyist shows up at the congressman's organization. When confrontational direct action crops up at the stop of the policy cycle rather than the origin, it is much more likely to read as opportunistic than sincere.
In the final analysis, climate conversion appears ready for political feat, but the proposals that succeed in Washington plausible will not reflect a significant convert in U.S. policy. Instead, they will copy the simplest compromises available to policymakers who are trying to juggle varied special interests, weighty financial issues and environmental concerns.
How's Amersterdam fairing since pot is decriminalized? Has their reduction collapsed because everyone is stoned?
Question:Answers:
1) Netherlands has the 10th largest GDP per capita within the World with $38,333.00 USD amazingly close to the United States of America with $42,101.00 USD which is currently the 8th richest country within the World by that measure.
2) No
Top 3 Answerer contained by Business & Finance. (Vote for me)
UK Membership of the Euro currency?
Question:When is the next referendum expected surrounded by UK on accepting Euro currency and will this acceptence happen at adjectives in the subsequent 5 years or so? Thanks!Answers:
In the next five years may be hopeful at best. But, if the U.K. requirements to stay a powerful empire as it once was it will HAVE to convert to the Euro. Because those who control the purse strings control the world. Cash (currency) is King. surrounded by the increasing global cutback.
could some one relay me go is this going to be over?
Question:Answers:
i don't know what Ur talking just about but could u pleas try to be a little more specific pleas i deem all of us will appreciated
Other Answers:
WHAT??
COULD YOU BE A LITTLE MORE SPECIFIC! WHENEVER YOU END IT! It was over yesterday. I thought you know. Sorry.
Just the other hours of daylight I saw a lady ingestion truckloads of candies while washing them down near sodas.
I am sure that when she gets to be an ample counterweight, she will be loaded on the stage to sing.
When that happens it will be OVER!
Source(s):
flashbacks of Rossaine Bar within San Diego.... yuk!
what is the consumer sanctuary feat?
Question:Answers:
it is the government agency that help protect consumers against products that are unsafe or if current products have a malfunction and tells nation what and where to return the product for a replacement or compensation.
Other Answers:
Consumer Safety Act is an act to protect consumers from getting explioted by the consumer products and services
What should I do when my hoes won't reimburse up?
Question:Pimping ain't easyAnswers:
Looks resembling you're gonna have to choke a b*tch.
Other Answers:
Get a physical job.
Get some new ones. Take him to court you did work for zilch .
spank dat ***** and spank her concrete!!
Take it out in trade.Watch "I'm going to get you Sucka" it will support. Is Devo short for deviant? If not, it works.
what are the denial externalities of a capitalist discount?
Question:Answers:
capitalism is not necessarily bad - if you connect capitalism next to the american founding fathers' wisdom to rein in fortunes, you have worthy just unprejudiced peaceful comfortable capitalism not going down the nuclear winter toilet
this is the wisdom everyone overlooks - think they can get by short - the founding fathers know the republic the land of the free - lack of restrictions equality democracy and fraternity [friendliness] would last singular as long as wealth did not concentrate contained by the hands of the few
we can acquire back to the landscape of the free, the american dream of freedom from tyranny [evil] by limiting fortunes and spreading fortunes equally among all workers - this would not be undeserved - big fortunes are not earned - billionaries do not sort money, they rake money -
bill gates works a fortnight and get up to US$1 billion - ie, gets a billion dollars worth of stock and services, of the products of others' work - 1% get 90% of world income - they clearly dont do 90% of the work - so this is unjust - they go and get overpaid, so others have to capture underpaid, ie robbed - which causes the hostility, which escalates - from sticks and stones to cannon to world wars to nuclear winter, triple iceage
everyone know that the rich get richer and the poor obtain poorer - but not many grasp that this is injustice, and injustice is pocketing, and theft of money is a greatest injury to general public, and people are not doormats, they hit stern - and injury flies back and forth vendetta style - till wee are adjectives hamburger meat -
take this embezzlement out of capitalism and you will have healthy capitalism, peaceful capitalism -
contribution is set - there are simply 125,000 hours in a lifetime of work - and the average settle is only US$15 an hour - contribution per character to world wealth by work is constrained - pay should be set , fortunes should be unlimited - you have to restrain fortunes and thus commit justice or we adjectives commit suicide - are we suicidal? - do we love misery? - hate cheeriness? - try happiness for a exchange, you might like it! - sprite is essential to survival and happiness - we enjoy proved that with centuries of injustice, we are proving it near super duper huper extreme injustice - fortnight pay from $1 to $1 billion - beside violence to contest - face facts -
time limit fortunes or continue injuring respectively other till we are history - stopped
everyone knows money make money - think almost it - it means the entity doesnt make the money - openly, or it wouldn be money making money - and if the person doesnt clear the money, he rakes the money that other individuals made - which is theft which is injustice which is injury which make for violence - even-handedness peace happiness, or injustice, time of war, misery and extinction - youve chosen the latter for 1000s of years, what about erudition the lesson of history at last formerly it is too late -
you can't hold injustice [theft] and happiness - carry happiness, acquire justice, gain limitation of fortunes - near is no choice, if you prefer to be peace and happiness - general public cheer and laugh when the period of war is over - so you do want peace -
return to the american dream - fairpay for everyone - wealth spread resembling work is - no tyranny - no overfortunes - no overpower - no slavery
after the first million, money multiplies like rabbits - the first thousand is harder than the second million - money make money - the poor man pays for all - these spell injustice, raid - no one can afford burglary - not even the richest - ceausescu fell, the french plutocracy fell - no one can protect themselves from the robbed - dont rob - afford back the money - share -
adjectives needs and millions of wishes are met by fairpay [which is US$75,000 [2006AD] a year per family working average tricky, if you pay housewives and students too, doubling every 12 years or so next to global inflation] - so overpay can do little to tag on to pleasure - gold tap in the bathroom, a jade pethouse, a slightly bigger rock on your finger
hazard is proportional to overpay - the bear beside all the honey get visitors - uneasy rests the herald that wears the crown
population dont realise that there are several wideopen legal ways of getting others money - help yourself to that out of capitalism and you have security and safety and a adjectives - that is the glum of capitalism but it is not an essential part of capitalism, it is a disease on capitalism - cure it or die
Other Answers:
The rich will become so rich that they will torment everybody else in the long run.